Abstract:Background: The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS-2.0) is a self-administered instrument to assess functional impairment. It is used in the general population as well as different patient groups. However, its application to patients with psychotic disorders may be hampered by disease-specific difficulties of self-estimation. This study aimed to examine the psychometric properties of the short (12-item) WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients attending a psychosis clinic in Gothenburg, Sweden. Methods: Annual data from two outpatient clinics registered 2016-2019 were analyzed retrospectively. The assessment of the short WHODAS-2.0 was based on the first questionnaire completed by 881 patients. Confirmatory factor analysis evaluated previously validated models. Item convergent and discriminant validity as well as internal reliability were computed. Construct validity was assessed by comparing mean differences in accord with previous research regarding patients' characteristics associated with functioning such as advanced age, diagnosed comorbidities, antipsychotic treatment status, and symptom severity measured with PANSS-8 remission items. Results: A heterogeneous sample was obtained in terms of age (range: 20-92), various living situations, and different geographic areas of birth. Most patients (75%) had been diagnosed with psychotic disorders more than 10 years ago and the majority (89%) were on antipsychotic medication. We confirmed an adjusted two-level factor model with a single second-order disability factor and six first-order factors representing the six IFC dimensions. The WHODAS-2.0 sum score measuring general disability showed good reliability (Cronbach's alpha = 0.89). Construct validity was confirmed as older patients, patients with comorbidities, and patients in assisted living had higher WHODAS-2.0 scores. Patients with no or mild psychotic symptoms had significantly lower WHODAS-2.0 sum scores than patients with more severe symptoms. Conclusions: The findings further validate the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders. This study corroborates the clinical significance of the short, 12-item WHODAS-2.0 by demonstrating consistent associations between patients' age, medical comorbidities, living situation, antipsychotic treatment status, and psychotic symptom severity.

Proxy WHO Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 is clinically useful for assessing psychosocial functioning in severe mental illness

Proxy Reliability of the 12-Item World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule II among Adult Patients with Mental Disorders

Clinical validity of the 12-item WHODAS-2.0 in a naturalistic sample of outpatients with psychotic disorders

A comparison of patient ratings and staff ratings of disability using the World Health Organisation Disability Assessment Schedule in individuals with psychotic spectrum disorders who are forensic psychiatric inpatients

Assessment by proxy of the SF-36 and WHO-DAS 2.0. A systematic review

Comparing Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in schizophrenia

Measuring Disability Across Cultures — the Psychometric Properties of the WHODAS II in Older People from Seven Low‐ and Middle‐income Countries. the 10/66 Dementia Research Group Population‐based Survey

The Sociodemographic Factors Related to Disability of Applicants of Welfare Benefits in Greece: A Cross-Sectional Survey Based on the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0

The World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) as a measure among elderly population. A review

Modified WHODAS-II Provides Valid Measure of Global Disability but Filter Items Increased Skewness.

Comparing the Global Assessment of Functioning (GAF) and the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS) 2.0 in children and adolescents

Assessing the Effectiveness of Rehabilitation Interventions through the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0 on Disability—A Systematic Review

Disability, pain, and wound-specific concerns self-reported by adults at risk of limb loss: A cross-sectional study using the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule 2.0

Validity, reliability, and responsiveness of the Brazilian version of the instrument World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with obstructive sleep apnoea

Mapping the 12-item World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 (WHODAS 2.0) onto the assessment of quality of life (AQoL)-4D utilities

Equipercentile linking of the Sheehan Disability Scale and the World Health Organization Assessment Schedule 2.0 scales in people with mental disorders

Development of traditional Chinese version of World Health Organization disability assessment schedule 2.0 36--item (WHODAS 2.0) in Taiwan: validity and reliability analyses

Assessing functional disability in schizophrenia patients receiving the Management and Treatment Services for Psychosis in China: implications for community mental health services

Validation of the World Health Organization Disability Assessment Schedule (WHODAS 2.0) for individuals with asthma

Appropriateness of the EQ-HWB for Use in Residential Aged Care: A Proxy Perspective

Changes in the ability to participate in and satisfaction with social roles and activities in patients in outpatient rehabilitation