Abstract:During a bacterial infection or colonization, the detection of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is critical, but slow due to culture-based approaches for clinical and screening samples. Culture-based phenotypic AMR detection and confirmation require up to 72 hours (h) or even weeks for slow-growing bacteria. Direct shotgun metagenomics by long-read sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) may reduce the time for bacterial species and AMR gene identification. However, screening swabs for metagenomics is complex due to the range of Gram-negative and -positive bacteria, diverse AMR genes, and host DNA present in the samples. Therefore, DNA extraction is a critical initial step. We aimed to compare the performance of different DNA extraction protocols for ONT applications to reliably identify species and AMR genes using a shotgun long-read metagenomic approach. We included three different sample types: ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standard, an in-house mock community of ESKAPE pathogens including Enterococcus faecium , Staphylococcus aureus , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Acinetobacter baumannii , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Escherichia coli ( ESKAPE Mock ) , and anonymized clinical swab samples. We processed all sample types with four different DNA extraction kits utilizing different lysis (enzymatic vs. mechanical) and purification (spin-column vs. magnetic beads) methods. We used kits from Qiagen (QIAamp DNA Mini and QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA) and Promega (Maxwell RSC Cultured Cells and Maxwell RSC Buccal Swab DNA). After extraction, samples were subject to the Rapid Barcoding Kit (RBK004) for library preparation followed by sequencing on the GridION with R9.4.1 flow cells. The fast5 files were base called to fastq files using Guppy in High Accuracy (HAC) mode with the inbuilt MinKNOW software. Raw read quality was assessed using NanoPlot and human reads were removed using Minimap2 alignment against the Hg38 genome. Taxonomy identification was performed on the raw reads using Kraken2 and on assembled contigs using Minimap2. The AMR genes were identified using Minimap2 with alignment against the CARD database on both the raw reads and assembled contigs. We identified all bacterial species present in the Zymo Mock Community (8/8) and ESKAPE Mock (6/6) with Qiagen PowerFecal Pro DNA kit (chemical and mechanical lysis) at read and assembly levels. Enzymatic lysis retrieved fewer aligned bases for the Gram-positive species ( Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium ) from the ESKAPE Mock on the assembly level compared to the mechanical lysis. We detected the AMR genes from Gram-negative and -positive species in the ESKAPE Mock with the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA kit on reads level with a maximum median time of 1.9 h of sequencing. Long-read metagenomics with ONT may reduce the turnaround time in screening for AMR genes. Currently, the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA kit (chemical and mechanical lysis) for DNA extraction along with the Rapid Barcoding Kit for the ONT sequencing captured the best taxonomy and AMR identification for our specific use case.

Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria

Evaluation of DNA extraction kits for long-read shotgun metagenomics using Oxford Nanopore sequencing for rapid taxonomic and antimicrobial resistance detection

Comparative evaluation of commercial DNA isolation approaches for nanopore-only bacterial genome assembly and plasmid recovery

High molecular weight DNA extraction strategies for long‐read sequencing of complex metagenomes

Evaluation of five commercial DNA extraction kits using Salmonella as a model for implementation of rapid Nanopore sequencing in routine diagnostic laboratories

FindingNemo: A Toolkit for DNA Extraction, Library Preparation and Purification for Ultra Long Nanopore Sequencing

Comparative evaluation of soil DNA extraction kits for long read metagenomic sequencing

High‐molecular‐weight DNA extraction for long‐read sequencing of plant genomes: An optimization of standard methods

A novel barcoded nanopore sequencing workflow of high-quality, full-length bacterial 16S amplicons for taxonomic annotation of bacterial isolates and complex microbial communities

Comparison Analysis of Different DNA Extraction Methods on Suitability for Long-Read Metagenomic Nanopore Sequencing

Matching excellence: Oxford Nanopore Technologies' rise to parity with Pacific Biosciences in genome reconstruction of non-model bacterium with high G+C content

Matching Excellence: ONT’s Rise to Parity with PacBio in Genome Reconstruction of Non-Model Bacterium with High GC Content

Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for whole metagenome sequencing of human oral, vaginal, and rectal microbiome samples

Approaches to Whole Mitochondrial Genome Sequencing on the Oxford Nanopore MinION

Evaluation of 96‐well high‐throughput DNA extraction methods for 16S rRNA gene metabarcoding

Method for isolation of high molecular weight genomic DNA from Botryococcus biomass

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies

Performance evaluation of a new custom, multi-component DNA isolation method optimized for use in shotgun metagenomic sequencing-based aerosol microbiome research

DNA extraction of microbial DNA directly from infected tissue: an optimized protocol for use in nanopore sequencing

Nanopore Is Preferable over Illumina for 16S Amplicon Sequencing of the Gut Microbiota When Species-Level Taxonomic Classification, Accurate Estimation of Richness, or Focus on Rare Taxa Is Required

Do we still need Illumina sequencing data? Evaluating Oxford Nanopore Technologies R10.4.1 flow cells and the Rapid v14 library prep kit for Gram negative bacteria whole genome assemblies