Abstract:During a bacterial infection or colonization, the detection of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is critical, but slow due to culture-based approaches for clinical and screening samples. Culture-based phenotypic AMR detection and confirmation require up to 72 hours (h) or even weeks for slow-growing bacteria. Direct shotgun metagenomics by long-read sequencing using Oxford Nanopore Technologies (ONT) may reduce the time for bacterial species and AMR gene identification. However, screening swabs for metagenomics is complex due to the range of Gram-negative and -positive bacteria, diverse AMR genes, and host DNA present in the samples. Therefore, DNA extraction is a critical initial step. We aimed to compare the performance of different DNA extraction protocols for ONT applications to reliably identify species and AMR genes using a shotgun long-read metagenomic approach. We included three different sample types: ZymoBIOMICS Microbial Community Standard, an in-house mock community of ESKAPE pathogens including Enterococcus faecium , Staphylococcus aureus , Klebsiella pneumoniae , Acinetobacter baumannii , Pseudomonas aeruginosa , and Escherichia coli ( ESKAPE Mock ) , and anonymized clinical swab samples. We processed all sample types with four different DNA extraction kits utilizing different lysis (enzymatic vs. mechanical) and purification (spin-column vs. magnetic beads) methods. We used kits from Qiagen (QIAamp DNA Mini and QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA) and Promega (Maxwell RSC Cultured Cells and Maxwell RSC Buccal Swab DNA). After extraction, samples were subject to the Rapid Barcoding Kit (RBK004) for library preparation followed by sequencing on the GridION with R9.4.1 flow cells. The fast5 files were base called to fastq files using Guppy in High Accuracy (HAC) mode with the inbuilt MinKNOW software. Raw read quality was assessed using NanoPlot and human reads were removed using Minimap2 alignment against the Hg38 genome. Taxonomy identification was performed on the raw reads using Kraken2 and on assembled contigs using Minimap2. The AMR genes were identified using Minimap2 with alignment against the CARD database on both the raw reads and assembled contigs. We identified all bacterial species present in the Zymo Mock Community (8/8) and ESKAPE Mock (6/6) with Qiagen PowerFecal Pro DNA kit (chemical and mechanical lysis) at read and assembly levels. Enzymatic lysis retrieved fewer aligned bases for the Gram-positive species ( Staphylococcus aureus and Enterococcus faecium ) from the ESKAPE Mock on the assembly level compared to the mechanical lysis. We detected the AMR genes from Gram-negative and -positive species in the ESKAPE Mock with the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA kit on reads level with a maximum median time of 1.9 h of sequencing. Long-read metagenomics with ONT may reduce the turnaround time in screening for AMR genes. Currently, the QIAamp PowerFecal Pro DNA kit (chemical and mechanical lysis) for DNA extraction along with the Rapid Barcoding Kit for the ONT sequencing captured the best taxonomy and AMR identification for our specific use case.

Comparative evaluation of soil DNA extraction kits for long read metagenomic sequencing

Evaluation of commercial RNA extraction kits for long-read metatranscriptomics in soil

Comparison of DNA Extraction and Purification Methods from Different Soils for Metagenomic Sequencing

Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for whole metagenome sequencing of human oral, vaginal, and rectal microbiome samples

The choice of the DNA extraction method may influence the outcome of the soil microbial community structure analysis

Assessing Impacts of DNA Extraction Methods on Next Generation Sequencing of Water and Wastewater Samples.

Evaluation of five commercial DNA extraction kits using Salmonella as a model for implementation of rapid Nanopore sequencing in routine diagnostic laboratories

High-throughput DNA extraction and cost-effective miniaturized metagenome and amplicon library preparation of soil samples for DNA sequencing

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies

Quantitative and qualitative evaluation of the impact of the G2 enhancer, bead sizes and lysing tubes on the bacterial community composition during DNA extraction from recalcitrant soil core samples based on community sequencing and qPCR

Comparing sediment DNA extraction methods for assessing organic enrichment associated with marine aquaculture

Comparison of DNA extraction methods on different sample matrices within the same terrestrial ecosystem

Improvements on environmental DNA extraction and purification procedures for matagenomic analysis

Comparison Analysis of Different DNA Extraction Methods on Suitability for Long-Read Metagenomic Nanopore Sequencing

Combined assembly of long and short sequencing reads improve the efficiency of exploring the soil metagenome

Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria

Improving the efficiency of DNA extraction from iron incrustations and oilfield-produced water

Evaluation of DNA extraction kits for long-read shotgun metagenomics using Oxford Nanopore sequencing for rapid taxonomic and antimicrobial resistance detection

Biases During DNA Extraction of Activated Sludge Samples Revealed by High Throughput Sequencing

Sequencing Depth Has a Stronger Effect than DNA Extraction on Soil Bacterial Richness Discovery

Comparison of Protein Extraction Methods and Data Analysis Strategies for Complete Metaproteomic Soil Analysis