Abstract:Microbiome studies are becoming larger in size to detect the potentially small effect that environmental factors have on our gut microbiomes, or that the microbiome has on our health. Therefore, fast and reproducible DNA isolation methods are needed to handle thousands of fecal samples. We used the Chemagic 360 chemistry and Magnetic Separation Module I (MSMI) instrument to compare two sample preservatives and four different pre-treatment protocols to find an optimal method for DNA isolation from thousands of fecal samples. The pre-treatments included bead beating, sample handling in tube and plate format, and proteinase K incubation. The optimal method offers a sufficient yield of high-quality DNA without contamination. Three human fecal samples (adult, senior, and infant) with technical replicates were extracted. The extraction included negative controls (OMNIgeneGUT, DNA/RNA shield fluid, and Chemagic Lysis Buffer 1) to detect cross-contamination and ZymoBIOMICS Gut Microbiome Standard as a positive control to mimic the human gut microbiome and assess sensitivity of the extraction method. All samples were extracted using Chemagic DNA Stool 200 H96 kit (PerkinElmer, Finland). The samples were collected in two preservatives, OMNIgeneGUT and DNA/RNA shield fluid. DNA quantity was measured using Qubit-fluorometer, DNA purity and quality using gel electrophoresis, and taxonomic signatures with 16S rRNA gene-based sequencing with V3V4 and V4 regions. Bead beating increased bacterial diversity. The largest increase was detected in gram-positive genera Blautia, Bifidobacterium, and Ruminococcus. Preservatives showed minor differences in bacterial abundances. The profiles between the V3V4 and V4 regions differed considerably with lower diversity samples. Negative controls showed signs from genera abundant in fecal samples. Technical replicates of the Gut Standard and stool samples showed low variation. The selected isolation protocol included recommended steps from manufacturer as well as bead beating. Bead beating was found to be necessary to detect hard-to-lyse bacteria. The protocol was reproducible in terms of DNA yield among different stool replicates and the ZymoBIOMICS Gut Microbiome Standard. The MSM1 instrument and pre-treatment in a 96-format offered the possibility of automation and handling of large sample collections. Both preservatives were feasible in terms of sample handling and had low variation in taxonomic signatures. The 16S rRNA target region had a high impact on the composition of the bacterial profile. Importance: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a widely used method for determining the composition of the gut microbiota. Due to the differences in the gut microbiota composition between individuals, microbiome studies have expanded into large population studies to maximize detection of small effects on microbe-host interactions. Thus, the demand for a rapid and reliable microbial profiling is continuously increasing, making the optimization of high-throughput 96-format DNA extraction integral for NGS-based downstream applications. However, experimental protocols are prone to bias and errors from sample collection and storage, to DNA extraction, primer selection and sequencing, and bioinformatics analyses. Methodological bias can contribute to differences in microbiome profiles, causing variability across studies and laboratories using different protocols. To improve consistency and confidence of the measurements, the standardization of microbiome analysis methods has been recognized in many fields.

High molecular weight DNA extraction strategies for long‐read sequencing of complex metagenomes

High‐molecular‐weight DNA extraction for long‐read sequencing of plant genomes: An optimization of standard methods

Low-Input High-Molecular-Weight DNA Extraction for Long-Read Sequencing From Plants of Diverse Families

Extraction and selection of high-molecular-weight DNA for long-read sequencing from Chlamydomonas reinhardtii

FindingNemo: A Toolkit for DNA Extraction, Library Preparation and Purification for Ultra Long Nanopore Sequencing

Comparison of 6 DNA extraction methods for isolation of high yield of high molecular weight DNA suitable for shotgun metagenomics Nanopore sequencing to detect bacteria

3D Printing-Enabled DNA Extraction for Long-Read Genomics

Method for isolation of high molecular weight genomic DNA from Botryococcus biomass

Whole genome sequencing of marine organisms by Oxford Nanopore Technologies: Assessment and optimization of HMW‐DNA extraction protocols

Extraction of high‐quality, high‐molecular‐weight DNA depends heavily on cell homogenization methods in green microalgae

High-molecular weight DNA extraction from challenging fungi using CTAB for lysis and precipitation v3

Comparative evaluation of soil DNA extraction kits for long read metagenomic sequencing

Complete nontuberculous mycobacteria whole genomes using an optimized DNA extraction protocol for long-read sequencing

Comparison of commercial DNA extraction kits for whole metagenome sequencing of human oral, vaginal, and rectal microbiome samples

DNA copy number analysis of fresh and formalin-fixed specimens by shallow whole-genome sequencing with identification and exclusion of problematic regions in the genome assembly

Improvements on environmental DNA extraction and purification procedures for matagenomic analysis

Assessment of fecal DNA extraction protocols for metagenomic studies

High-throughput DNA extraction strategy for fecal microbiome studies

Extraction of highly degraded DNA from ancient bones, teeth and sediments for high-throughput sequencing

Using Repeated Lysis Steps Fractionates Between Heterotrophic and Cyanobacterial DNA Extracted from Xenic Cyanobacterial Cultures