Abstract:Prior research provided evidence for retrospective and prospective judgements of immanent justice in adults, but the developmental origins of judgements of immanent justice remain unknown. Both retrospective and prospective judgements were investigated in preschool age, using explicit and implicit measures. In Experiment 1, 2.5‐ and 4‐year‐olds were first shown events in which one agent distributed resources fairly or unfairly, and then they saw test events in which both distributors were damaged by a misfortune. Later, they were presented with a verbal task, in which they had to respond to two questions on evaluation of the deservingness, by using explicit measures. All children were likely to approve of deserved outcomes when deeds and outcomes were congruent (i.e., unfair distributor—misfortune), and only older ones were likely to disapprove when they were incongruent (i.e., fair distributor—misfortune). In Experiment 2, 4‐year‐olds after seeing familiarization events of Experiment 1, were presented with two verbal questions to explore prospective judgements of immanent justice, by using explicit measures. In Experiment 3, 4‐year‐olds were first shown familiarization events of Experiment 1 and listened to respective narratives, then before the outcome was revealed they were assessed with a reaching task to investigate prospective judgements of immanent justice, by using implicit measures. Children reached the image depicting a bad outcome for the unfair distributor, and that illustrated a good outcome for the fair distributor. The results of the last two experiments demonstrated a fine ability to make prospective judgements at 4 years of life, and found that they were to be more prone to apply immanent justice reasoning to positive outcomes following good actions. Taken together, these results provide new evidence for preschoolers' retrospective and prospective judgements of immanent justice.

Distinct Inhibitory-Control Processes Underlie Children's Judgments of Fairness

Distinct Inhibitory Control Mechanisms Underlie Selective Social Inferences

The Development of Children's Preferences for Equality and Equity Across 13 Individualistic and Collectivist Cultures.

"Favoring my playmate seems fair": Inhibitory control and theory of mind in preschoolers' self-disadvantaging behaviors

Collaboration promotes proportional reasoning about resource distribution in young children.

Time pressure increases children's aversion to advantageous inequity

Common and distinct equity preferences in children and adults

Preschoolers' retrospective and prospective judgements of immanent justice following distributive actions

Against unfairness: Young children's judgments about merit, equity, and equality

Children's, adolescents', and young adults' reward allocations to hypothetical siblings and fairness judgments: effects of actor gender, character type, and allocation pattern

Inhibition and young children’s performance on the Tower of London task

Developmental patterns and computational mechanisms of school-aged children's fairness-related decision making under social comparison

The ontogeny of children's social emotions in response to (un)fairness

Early intergroup coalition: Toddlers attribute fair distributions to Black rather than White distributors

Is Distributional Justice Equivalent to Prosocial Sharing in Children's Cognition?

The Development of Cognitive Control in Preschoolers and Kindergarteners: The Case of Post-Error Slowing and Delayed Disinhibition

Social information affects adults' evaluation of fairness in distributions: An ERP approach

Rectifying social inequalities in a resource allocation task

Development of in-group favoritism in children’s third-party punishment of selfishness

The role of inhibition in young children's altruistic behaviour

From outcome to process: A developmental shift in judgments of good reasoning