Abstract:The fact that the cognition factor plays a significant role in individual decision-making has been recognized by a majority of psychologists.Some economics and psychology research described a phenomenon that when players had a distinct right in a bargaining game,they manifested various strategies and decision behavior.But there were few investigators of mental mechanism and litle support of experiment data for this phenomenon.In a Nash bargaining game,the two players had interdependent relations and identical rights.However,the two players in the ultimatum game had not only interdependent relations but also dissimilar rights.In the ultimatum game,the proposer and the respondent were both faced with the cognition issue understanding of the rights of his own and the other's.Based on the analysis of game tasks and theories,the author proposed the right cognition effect was a phenomenon in bargaining games and that the strategic choice and decision behavior of the decision maker were influenced because of his/her cognition degree about his/her right and the other player's right.The Nash bargaining game(NG) and the ultimatum game(UG) were chosen to investigate the existence of the right cognition effect.180 children and 60 university students averagely aged 6,9,12 and 20 participated in the experiment.In NG,they were requested to individually make a distribution number from 10 tokens to an anonymous peer.In UG,they made an offer from 10 tokens to another anonymous peer.All the tokens they got in the game would exchange with their favorite award,including candy,stationery or cash.Their NG scores were calculated by subtracting the distribution number from 10.Their UG scores were their offers.Every participant played NG and UG five times.After each game,they answered some questions about their strategies.In the end,the participants exchanged the tokens they gained for favorite rewards.The Paired-Samples T Test showed that each child's group made significantly different decision-making behaviors between NG and UG.The result of university students was not of statistical significance,but a minority of university students did the different decisionmaking.This proved the existence of the right cognition effect.We supposed it was an expression of ecological rationality.This cognition effect reflected that the individual made the advantageous decision-making behavior by using the dominant information of environment,which may give an explanation of reasons for irrationality decision-making.The subjects affected by the right cognition effect decreased with age.With the increase of age,the number of persons affected by the right cognition effect showed a gradual downward trend.This was not only the embodiment of the level of self-centered and theory of mind,but also the embodiment of children's developmental process of two decision-making systems.In both games,some players showed cooperation and fair behavior.The person who used fair strategy was not under the right cognition effect influence.These findings suggested that the right cognition effect existed in the 6-to 12-year-old children and university students.With the advance of age,the number of persons affected by the right cognition effect showed a gradual downward trend.But it still accounted for more than half of the overall in children.In the right cognition effect,the understanding of the distribution right is superior to the understanding of the veto power in children.

Time pressure increases children's aversion to advantageous inequity

The Development of Children's Preferences for Equality and Equity Across 13 Individualistic and Collectivist Cultures.

Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: the Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity

Collaboration promotes proportional reasoning about resource distribution in young children.

"Favoring my playmate seems fair": Inhibitory control and theory of mind in preschoolers' self-disadvantaging behaviors

Young children share more under time pressure than after a delay

Distinct Inhibitory-Control Processes Underlie Children's Judgments of Fairness

Common and distinct equity preferences in children and adults

Symbolic distancing in sharing situations restrains children's economic behavior and potentially also their inequity aversion

Age differences of responders' decision-making in disadvantageous and advantageous inequality contexts in the ultimatum game: The role of social value orientation

The ontogeny of children's social emotions in response to (un)fairness

Developmental patterns and computational mechanisms of school-aged children's fairness-related decision making under social comparison

Against unfairness: Young children's judgments about merit, equity, and equality

Time pressure increases cooperation in competitively framed social dilemmas

What do children value more in a collaborator-Problem-solving capacity or fair sharing?

The Right Cognition Effect in Bargaining Game Decision-making

No Signs of Inclusive Fitness or Reciprocal Altruism in Advantageous Inequity Aversion

Egalitarian preferences in young children depend on the genders of the interacting partners

Sharing and Allocation in Preschool Children: The Roles of Theory of Mind, Anticipated Emotions, and Consequential Emotions

Children's consideration of effort and outcome in reward distribution tasks

Children's, adolescents', and young adults' reward allocations to hypothetical siblings and fairness judgments: effects of actor gender, character type, and allocation pattern