Abstract:Background: Collaborative learning is recognized as an effective learning tool in the classroom. In order to optimize the collaborative learning experience for children within a collaborative partnership, it is important to understand how to match the children by ability level, and whether assigning roles within these dyads is beneficial or not. Aims: The current study investigated the effect of partnering children with different task-specific abilities and assigning or not assigning helping roles within the dyads on the quality of talk used in a collaborative learning task. Sample: The participants in this study comprised 54 year 6 pupils from a Western Sydney government primary school (boys=26, girls=28). The ages ranged from 10 years 10 months to 12 years 4 months with a mean age of 11 years 4 months. Method: The children were formed into 27 single sex dyads of low-middle- and low-high-ability partnerships. In half of each of these dyads the higher ability partner was asked to help the lower ability partner, which was compared with just asking partners to work together. The quality of talk used by the dyads while working collaboratively on the problem-solving task was analysed using a language analysis framework developed by Mercer and colleagues (e.g. Littleton et al., 2005; Mercer, 1994, 1996). Results: Results of this study found that children who worked collaboratively in the low-middle-ability dyad condition demonstrated significantly more high-quality exploratory talk than those in the low-high-ability dyad condition. Although there was no significant difference between dyads who were assigned roles and those who were asked to work together, there was an interaction trend which suggests that low-high-ability dyads, who were given the roles of helper and learner, showed more exploratory talk than dyads who were asked just to work together. Conclusion: Mercer's re-conceptualization of Vygotsky's Zone of Proximal Development (ZPD) in terms of the Intermental Development Zone (IDZ), which is reliant on constructive challenging discourse, can potentially provide a platform upon which all learners in the classroom can benefit from collaborative learning experiences.

What do children value more in a collaborator-Problem-solving capacity or fair sharing?

Children's consideration of collaboration and merit when making sharing decisions in private

Collaboration promotes proportional reasoning about resource distribution in young children.

Cooperation, but Not Competition, Improves 4-Year-old Children's Reasoning about Others' Diverse Desires.

The Development of Children's Preferences for Equality and Equity Across 13 Individualistic and Collectivist Cultures.

Young Children Share the Spoils After Collaboration

Cooperation Turns Preschoolers into Flexible Perspective Takers

Towards effective partnerships in a collaborative problem-solving task

Time pressure increases children's aversion to advantageous inequity

Effort-based decision making in joint action: Evidence of a sense of fairness

"Favoring my playmate seems fair": Inhibitory control and theory of mind in preschoolers' self-disadvantaging behaviors

Chinese Preschoolers' Resource Allocation in the Face of Existing Inequality under Collaborative and Noncollaborative Contexts

Common and distinct equity preferences in children and adults

Partner choice creates fairness in humans

3- and 5-year-old children's adherence to explicit and implicit joint commitments

Does a peer model's task proficiency influence children's solution choice and innovation?

Peer assistance in children's problem solving

How you act matters: The impact of coordination on 4-year-old children's reasoning about diverse desires

Egalitarian preferences in young children depend on the genders of the interacting partners

Children's, adolescents', and young adults' reward allocations to hypothetical siblings and fairness judgments: effects of actor gender, character type, and allocation pattern

Are Only-Children Difficult Team Members?