Abstract:The present study sought to evaluate the reproducibility of prominent findings stated by Fehr et al. in their developmental resource allocation experiment "Egalitarianism in Young Children", published in 2008. The experiment involved children making decisions about distributing sweets between themselves and either an in‐group or an out‐group recipient. Fehr et al. found that (1) inequity aversion develops with age; (2) 3‐ to 4‐year‐old children are inclined toward self‐advantageous allocations, whereas 7‐ to 8‐year‐olds distribute sweets more evenly in divisions, and (3) the influence of group status increases as children age. The original article stated that 229 Swiss school students aged 3 to 8 years (102 boys, 127 girls) participated in the study. However, no further demographics were reported. In our attempts to reproduce Fehr et al.'s original analyses and reanalyse the raw dataset, we found that one of the key variables was miscoded. After rectifying the miscoded variable, the reproduction results revealed only one ambiguously irreproducible result regarding a group status main effect in the sharing mini‐game—with three other tests exhibiting either strong reproducibility or ambiguous reproducibility. Reanalysis results indicated that Fehr et al.'s conclusions are robust when tested with alternative analytical tests. Highlights We evaluated the reproducibility of Fehr et al.'s (2008) highly cited developmental resource allocation findings. After identifying an inversely coded variable, we found all tests—bar one probit regression not related to major findings—to be reproducible. Reanalysis confirmed the robustness of Fehr et al.'s conclusions when using alternate analytical methods. Fehr et al.'s developmental resource allocation findings are reproducible and have theoretical implications for understanding inequity aversion and group status effects on resource allocation decisions in young children.

Against unfairness: Young children's judgments about merit, equity, and equality

The Development of Children's Preferences for Equality and Equity Across 13 Individualistic and Collectivist Cultures.

Rectifying social inequalities in a resource allocation task

"This kid looks like he has everything": 3- to 11-year-old children's concerns for fairness and social preferences when peers differ in social class and race

Collaboration promotes proportional reasoning about resource distribution in young children.

Egalitarian preferences in young children depend on the genders of the interacting partners

Children recognize and reject favoritism in norm enforcement

The ontogeny of children's social emotions in response to (un)fairness

Children's, adolescents', and young adults' reward allocations to hypothetical siblings and fairness judgments: effects of actor gender, character type, and allocation pattern

Common and distinct equity preferences in children and adults

Verification report: Egalitarianism in young children

Chinese Preschoolers' Resource Allocation in the Face of Existing Inequality under Collaborative and Noncollaborative Contexts

Preschoolers' retrospective and prospective judgements of immanent justice following distributive actions

Early intergroup coalition: Toddlers attribute fair distributions to Black rather than White distributors

Time pressure increases children's aversion to advantageous inequity

Distinct Inhibitory-Control Processes Underlie Children's Judgments of Fairness

Children's consideration of effort and outcome in reward distribution tasks

Can selecting the most qualified candidate be unfair? Learning about socioeconomic advantages and disadvantages reduces the perceived fairness of meritocracy and increases support for socioeconomic diversity initiatives in organizations.

Children's consideration of collaboration and merit when making sharing decisions in private

Do Young Children Understand Relative Value Comparisons?

The development of inequality acceptance