Characterization of two methylenedioxy bridge-forming cytochrome P450-dependent enzymes of alkaloid formation in the Mexican prickly poppy Argemone mexicana.

María Luisa Díaz Chávez,Megan Rolf,Andreas Gesell,T. Kutchan

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.abb.2010.11.016

IF: 4.114

2011-03-01

Archives of Biochemistry and Biophysics

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Collaboration promotes proportional reasoning about resource distribution in young children.

Rowena Ng,Gail D. Heyman,David Barner

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/a0024923

2011-01-01

Developmental Psychology

Abstract:The authors investigated how children and adults evaluate the "niceness" of individuals who engage in resource distribution, with a focus on their sensitivity to the proportion of resources given. Across 3 experiments, subjects evaluated the niceness of a child who gave a quantity of pennies to another child. In Study 1 (N = 30), adults showed sensitivity to the proportion given, whereas 5- and 7-year-old children did not. In Study 2 (N = 74), both younger (3- to 5-year-old) and older (6- to 8-year-old) children were sensitive to proportion only when resources were earned by a giver in collaboration with the recipient rather than by the giver alone. Adults, however, were sensitive to proportion in both cases. In Study 3 (N = 44), the authors tested 5- and 6-year-olds and their parents to be sure that socioeconomic and ethnic differences between samples did not drive results and replicated key findings from Studies 1 and 2. Together, these findings indicate that children favor proportional resource distribution in situations that invoke intuitions about equity. The authors suggest that these intuitions may form the basis for adult notions of fairness and generosity.

psychology, developmental
The Development of Children's Preferences for Equality and Equity Across 13 Individualistic and Collectivist Cultures.

Elizabeth Huppert,Jason M. Cowell,Yawei Cheng,Carlos Contreras-Ibanez,Natalia Gomez-Sicard,Maria Luz Gonzalez-Gadea,David Huepe,Agustin Ibanez,Kang Lee,Randa Mahasneh,Susan Malcolm-Smith,Natalia Salas,Bilge Selcuk,Bertil Tungodden,Alina Wong,Xinyue Zhou,Jean Decety

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/desc.12729

IF: 3.7

2018-01-01

Developmental Science

Abstract:A concern for fairness is a fundamental and universal element of morality. To examine the extent to which cultural norms are integrated into fairness cognitions and influence social preferences regarding equality and equity, a large sample of children (N 2,163) aged 4-11 were tested in 13 diverse countries. Children participated in three versions of a third-party, contextualized distributive justice game between two hypothetical recipients differing in terms of wealth, merit, and empathy. Social decision-making in these games revealed universal age-related shifts from equality-based to equity-based distribution motivations across cultures. However, differences in levels of individualism and collectivism between the 13 countries predicted the age and extent to which children favor equity in each condition. Children from the most individualistic cultures endorsed equitable distributions to a greater degree than children from more collectivist cultures when recipients differed in regards to wealth and merit. However, in an empathy context where recipients differed in injury, children from the most collectivist cultures exhibited greater preferences to distribute resource equitably compared to children from more individualistic cultures. Children from the more individualistic cultures also favored equitable distributions at an earlier age than children from more collectivist cultures overall. These results demonstrate aspects of both cross-cultural similarity and divergence in the development of fairness preferences.
Against unfairness: Young children's judgments about merit, equity, and equality

Laura Elenbaas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2019.05.009

Abstract:This study examined young children's judgments of resource distributions that either adhered to or diverged from principles of equality, equity, or merit in straightforward, peer-based scenarios. The sample comprised 192 ethnically and socioeconomically diverse 3- to 8-year-olds. Between 3 and 8 years of age, children evaluated inequitable and anti-meritorious allocations more negatively but did not evaluate equitable and meritorious allocations more positively. Rather, between 3 and 8 years, children increasingly supported equality. Highlighting an important but often overlooked developmental distinction, these results suggest that young children are increasingly against unfairness, but do not always endorse the most complex forms of distributive fairness.
"This kid looks like he has everything": 3- to 11-year-old children's concerns for fairness and social preferences when peers differ in social class and race

Laura Elenbaas,Katherine Luken Raz,Amanda Ackerman,Ellen Kneeskern

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/cdev.13778

Abstract:This study investigated 3- to 11-year-old US children's (N = 348) perceptions of access to resources, social group preferences, and resource distribution decisions and reasoning when hypothetical peers differed in social class (poor or rich) and race (Black or White). Data were collected in 2019. The sample reflected the region where data were collected in terms of gender (44% girls, 30% boys, 1% another identity) and race and ethnicity (46% White, 10% multiracial or multiethnic, 9% Black, 5% Latinx, 2% Asian, 3% another identity), and parents reported a higher average level of education than the regional average. Results revealed both marked age differences in children's perceptions, preferences, decisions, and reasoning and specific combinations of peer group memberships that were especially likely to receive preferential treatment. With age, children perceived that rich peers had greater access to resources than poor peers, but when both peers were poor, White peers were perceived to have more resources than Black peers. Social group preferences changed with age, from mixed social class and racial group preferences, to preferences for rich peers, to dislike for rich peers. Resource allocation decisions and reasoning reflected both social group and fairness concerns: young children distributed more to White peers especially if they were also rich, participants in middle childhood explicitly favored rich peers regardless of their race, and older children distributed more to poor peers and reasoned about either moral concerns for equity or social class stereotypes. Thus, overall, younger children's responses often reflected broader economic and racial inequalities while older children often sought to create more equity, though not always for moral reasons.
Verification report: Egalitarianism in young children

Georgia Clift,Jennifer Beaudry,Sumie Leung,Jordy Kaufman

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/icd.2505

2024-04-16

Infant and Child Development

Abstract:The present study sought to evaluate the reproducibility of prominent findings stated by Fehr et al. in their developmental resource allocation experiment "Egalitarianism in Young Children", published in 2008. The experiment involved children making decisions about distributing sweets between themselves and either an in‐group or an out‐group recipient. Fehr et al. found that (1) inequity aversion develops with age; (2) 3‐ to 4‐year‐old children are inclined toward self‐advantageous allocations, whereas 7‐ to 8‐year‐olds distribute sweets more evenly in divisions, and (3) the influence of group status increases as children age. The original article stated that 229 Swiss school students aged 3 to 8 years (102 boys, 127 girls) participated in the study. However, no further demographics were reported. In our attempts to reproduce Fehr et al.'s original analyses and reanalyse the raw dataset, we found that one of the key variables was miscoded. After rectifying the miscoded variable, the reproduction results revealed only one ambiguously irreproducible result regarding a group status main effect in the sharing mini‐game—with three other tests exhibiting either strong reproducibility or ambiguous reproducibility. Reanalysis results indicated that Fehr et al.'s conclusions are robust when tested with alternative analytical tests. Highlights We evaluated the reproducibility of Fehr et al.'s (2008) highly cited developmental resource allocation findings. After identifying an inversely coded variable, we found all tests—bar one probit regression not related to major findings—to be reproducible. Reanalysis confirmed the robustness of Fehr et al.'s conclusions when using alternate analytical methods. Fehr et al.'s developmental resource allocation findings are reproducible and have theoretical implications for understanding inequity aversion and group status effects on resource allocation decisions in young children.

psychology, developmental
Children's consideration of effort and outcome in reward distribution tasks

Emily Kim,Vanessa LoBue

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12778

2024-11-05

Social Development

Abstract:In the current study, we asked whether children recognize initial inequalities in resources and the effect of these inequalities on subsequent outcomes. We presented 6‐ to 8‐year‐old children with a series of vignettes in which characters' contribution and effort to a joint task were manipulated, along with the tool they had to complete the task, which affected their relative advantage. Each vignette contained a situation where two children had to help a third person dig pails of sand. In each scenario, the number of pails each child dug, as well as the type of shovel (making it easier or harder for them to dig), was manipulated. Children were asked how rewards should be distributed and who they believed worked harder. We found that children weighed outcome, or the number of pails of sand produced, more heavily than other factors, and only the oldest children showed evidence of considering initial inequalities and effort when making decisions about resource allocation.

psychology, developmental
Fast Optimal Algorithms for the Minimum Rectilinear

K. Leung

Abstract:| In this paper, we present two optimal algorithms for solving the Minimum Rectilinear Steiner Arborescence (MRSA) Problem. The rst algorithm is a recursive branch-and-bound variant of the RSA heuristic by Rao et al. [14]. The second algorithm uses dynamic programming to avoid solving the same subproblemmore than once. Furthermore, both algorithms can be generalized to solve the All-Quadrant MRSA Problem. Extensive experimental results show that our algorithms signi cantly outperform existing exact methods for solving the MRSA problem.
Chinese Preschoolers' Resource Allocation in the Face of Existing Inequality under Collaborative and Noncollaborative Contexts

Qiao Chai,Jie He

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0000359

2017-01-01

Developmental Psychology

Abstract:The current study investigated the stage at which Chinese preschoolers started considering recipients' material welfare and minimizing existing inequalities under both noncollaborative and collaborative contexts. Also, it analyzed how they behaved when recipients' material welfare was in conflict with merit or equality rule. Experiment 1 found that 4-year-old children allocated resources to the poor rather than the rich character only under the noncollaborative context but not under the collaborative context, in which they had observed these 2 characters working together to finish a task. By contrast, 5-year-old children started doing so under both collaborative and noncollaborative contexts. When there was conflict between recipients' material welfare and merit in Experiment 2, 6-year-old children did not show any preference for either material welfare or merit, and they made equal or almost equal distributions. Without collaboration information, Experiment 3 further revealed that the children aged from 4 to 6 y preferred equal distribution to resource allocation considering recipients' material welfare. These findings have been discussed in terms of contextual information and cultural influences. (PsycINFO Database Record
Early intergroup coalition: Toddlers attribute fair distributions to Black rather than White distributors

Alessandra Geraci,Elena Commodari,Paola Perucchini

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/sode.12740

2024-04-02

Social Development

Abstract:Racial concepts emerge in preschool age, and affect children's evaluations of others' actions. This research investigated whether 2.5‐year‐old and 7‐year‐old children's (N = 160; 100% White) evaluations may be influenced by an initial racial bias when both out‐group and in‐group protagonists were evaluated directly by attributing the responsibility of negative or positive outcomes (i.e., fair or unfair distributions of resources). After seeing each of two familiarization events, displaying fair and unfair distributions performed by a hidden distributor, toddlers were asked to assign positive and negative outcomes to two distributors that were portrayed on drawings (Experiment 1) or photographs (Experiments 2–3) of White or Black faces. Seven‐year‐old children were assessed with the same forced‐choice character task by using photographs (Experiment 4). Toddlers showed a significant tendency to attribute a fair distribution of resources to Black faces only when these were shown by photographs. Conversely, 7‐year‐olds manifested a pro‐White/anti‐Black racial bias. These findings support prior literature on the age‐related development of race prejudice starting not before the three years of life, and shed light on an initial state that is aimed at intergroup coalitions.

psychology, developmental
A Developmental-Science Perspective on Social Inequality

Laura Elenbaas,Michael T. Rizzo,Melanie Killen

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0963721420964147

IF: 7.867

2020-11-18

Current Directions in Psychological Science

Abstract:Many people believe in equality of opportunity but overlook and minimize the structural factors that shape social inequalities in the United States and around the world, such as systematic exclusion (e.g., educational, occupational) based on group membership (e.g., gender, race, socioeconomic status). As a result, social inequalities persist and place marginalized social groups at elevated risk for negative emotional, learning, and health outcomes. Where do the beliefs and behaviors that underlie social inequalities originate? Recent evidence from developmental science indicates that an awareness of social inequalities begins in childhood and that children seek to explain the underlying causes of the disparities that they observe and experience. Moreover, children and adolescents show early capacities for understanding and rectifying inequalities when regulating access to resources in peer contexts. Drawing on a social reasoning developmental framework, we synthesize what is currently known about children’s and adolescents’ awareness, beliefs, and behavior concerning social inequalities and highlight promising avenues by which developmental science can help reduce harmful assumptions and foster a more just society.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Someone who knows and someone I trust: Investigating how and with whom U.S. 8- to 14-year-old youth seek to learn about racial inequality.

Ellen Kneeskern,Laura Elenbaas

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/dev0001631

2023-09-29

Developmental Psychology

Abstract:This study investigated 8- to 14-year-old U.S. children's (N = 202, 47% girls, and 49% White) evaluations of statements reflecting individual and structural attributions for the causes of racial inequality between Black and White people in the United States, the epistemic characteristics they used to seek out more information on this topic, and who they believed reflected these characteristics. With age, participants increasingly endorsed statements reflecting structural attributions for racial inequality (i.e., educational and occupational exclusion), and increasingly reasoned about privilege and racism. In contrast, participants did not endorse statements reflecting individual attributions at any age (i.e., group differences in intelligence and effort), instead reasoning about equality between racial groups. Overall, participants sought expertise (i.e., content knowledge) and interpersonal trust (i.e., closeness and support) in a scenario where they could choose a discussion partner to learn more about racial inequality, and were most likely to seek out their family members, though some also sought out their friends, teachers, and the internet or social media. This study provides insights into who children see as relevant sources for learning about racial inequality and their reasons for trusting them. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved)

psychology, developmental
"Favoring my playmate seems fair": Inhibitory control and theory of mind in preschoolers' self-disadvantaging behaviors

Dongjie Xie,Meng Pei,Yanjie Su

DOI: https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1904.11219

2019-04-25

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between preschoolers' cognitive abilities and their fairness-related allocation behaviors in a dilemma of equity-efficiency conflict. Four- to 6-year-olds in Experiment 1 (N = 99) decided how to allocate 5 reward bells. In the first-party condition, preschoolers were asked to choose among giving more to self (self-advantageous inequity), wasting one bell (equity) or giving more to other (self-disadvantageous inequity); while in the third-party condition, they chose to allocate the extra bell to one of two equally deserving recipients or to waste it. Results showed that compared to the pattern of decision in the third-party condition, preschoolers in the first-party condition were more likely to give the extra bell to other (self-disadvantaging behaviors), and age, inhibitory control (IC) and theory of mind (ToM) were positively correlated with their self-disadvantaging choices, but only IC mediated the relationship between age and self-disadvantaging behaviors. Experiment 2 (N = 41) showed that IC still predicted preschoolers' self-disadvantaging behaviors when they could choose only between equity and disadvantageous inequity. These results suggested that IC played a critical role in the implementation of self-disadvantaging behaviors when this required the control over selfishness and envy.

Neurons and Cognition
Distinct Inhibitory-Control Processes Underlie Children's Judgments of Fairness

David M. Sobel,David G. Kamper,Joo-Hyun Song

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/09567976231217420

IF: 10.172

2024-01-10

Psychological Science

Abstract:Psychological Science, Ahead of Print. We examined how 5- to 8-year-olds (N = 51; Mage = 83 months; 27 female, 24 male; 69% White, 12% Black/African American, 8% Asian/Asian American, 6% Hispanic, 6% not reported) and adults (N = 18; Mage = 20.13 years; 11 female, 7 male) accepted or rejected different distributions of resources between themselves and others. We used a reach-tracking method to track finger movement in 3D space over time. This allowed us to dissociate two inhibitory processes. One involved pausing motor responses to detect conflict between observed information and how participants thought resources should be divided; the other involved resolving the conflict between the response and the alternative. Reasoning about disadvantageous inequities involved more of the first system, and this was stable across development. Reasoning about advantageous inequities involved more of the second system and showed more of a developmental progression. Generally, reach tracking offers an on-line measure of inhibitory control for the study of cognition.

psychology, multidisciplinary
Korean and American adolescents' judgments of group-based inequalities

Eunkyung Chung

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actpsy.2024.104617

IF: 1.8

2024-11-30

Acta Psychologica

Abstract:The current study examined how adolescents from different cultural backgrounds perceive and reason about group-based inequalities. Korean ( N = 84, 42 females) and American ( N = 72, 36 females) adolescents, aged 12 to 17, evaluated resource distribution inequalities in school contexts among social groups differentiated by social class, race, and gender. Across both cultures, nearly all adolescents found race and gender inequalities unacceptable based on moral concerns for equality. However, judgments about inequalities based on social class were more complex; adolescents evaluated these inequalities as less wrong and coordinated equality concerns with other considerations. They further distinguished between two types of social class situations that varied in the level of inequality, judging group-level social class inequality as more unacceptable than individual-level inequality. Cultural variations were evident in the justifications for their evaluations: American adolescents coordinated moral concerns of equality and welfare with personal and conventional reasons, while Korean adolescents also considered moral concerns of merit and property rights. Different interpretations of situational contexts led to varying prioritizations of moral concerns across the two cultures.

psychology, experimental
A multiplex PCR for detection of genes encoding exfoliative toxins from Staphylococcus hyicus

L. Andresen,P. Ahrens

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2672.2004.02258.x

2004-06-01

Journal of Applied Microbiology

Abstract:Aims: To develop a multiplex PCR for detection of genes encoding the exfoliative toxins ExhA, ExhB, ExhC and ExhD from Staphylococcus hyicus and to estimate the prevalence of exfoliative toxins among Staph. hyicus isolates from Danish pig herds with exudative epidermitis (EE).
I2Cnet medical image annotation service.

C. Chronaki,Xenophon Zabulis,S. Orphanoudakis

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/14639239709010905

Abstract:I2Cnet (Image Indexing by Content network) aims to provide services related to the content-based management of images in healthcare over the World-Wide Web. Each I2Cnet server maintains an autonomous repository of medical images and related information. The annotation service of I2Cnet allows specialists to interact with the contents of the repository, adding comments or illustrations to medical images of interest. I2Cnet annotations may be communicated to other users via e-mail or posted to I2Cnet for inclusion in its local repositories. This paper discusses the annotation service of I2Cnet and argues that such services pave the way towards the evolution of active digital medical image libraries.
Intergroup contact and evaluations of race-based exclusion in urban minority children and adolescents

Martin D Ruck,Henry Park,Melanie Killen,David S Crystal

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10964-010-9600-z

Abstract:There is a dearth of published research on the role of intergroup contact on urban US ethnic minority children's and adolescents' evaluations of racial exclusion. The current investigation examined these issues in a sample of low-income minority 4th, 7th, and 10th grade (N = 129, 60% female) African American and Latino/a students attending predominately racial and ethnic minority US urban public schools. Using individual interviews, participants were presented with scenarios depicting three contexts of interracial peer exclusion (lunch at school, a sleepover party, and a school dance). Novel findings were that intergroup contact was significantly related to low-income urban ethnic minority youth's evaluations of the wrongfulness of race-based exclusion and their awareness of the use of stereotypes to justify racial exclusion. Further, significant interactions involving intergroup contact, context, age, and gender were also found. Findings illustrated the importance of intergroup contact for ethnic minority students and the complexity of ethnic minority children's and adolescents' judgments and decision-making about interracial peer exclusion.
Preschoolers' Group Bias in Punishing Selfishness in the Ultimatum Game.

Zhen Wu,Xiaohe Gao

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jecp.2017.08.015

IF: 2.547

2017-01-01

Journal of Experimental Child Psychology

Abstract:Previous studies have shown that both adults and children tend to favor members of their own group and expect reciprocity of such in-group privilege. If a person is treated unfairly by an in-group member, a conflict arises between the tendency of in-group favoritism and the desire to punish violators of in-group norms. How do children solve the conflict at different points in development? We compared how preschoolers punished in-group and out-group members (marked by color preference) for selfishness in the Ultimatum Game. We found that (a) 3- to 6-year-old Chinese children rejected selfish allocations more often than fair ones, showing a robust preference for fairness; (b) 3- and 4-year-olds showed no group differences in their punishment behavior, suggesting that second-party punishment of selfishness is not biased during early childhood; (c) 5- and 6-year-old girls were more likely to punish selfishness of in-groups than of out-groups, illuminating an early sign of maintaining group-based fairness norms even at a personal cost; and (d) 5- and 6-year-old boys, however, punished in-groups and out-groups equally often and punished out-groups more often than did girls. These age and gender differences in children's punishment imply that socialization may play an important role in showing group bias when enforcing fairness norms.
Principal Stratification Approach to Broken Randomized Experiments

John Barnard,Constantine Frangakis,Jennifer Hill,Donald B. Rubin

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1198/016214503000071

IF: 4.369

2003-01-01

Journal of the American Statistical Association

Abstract:The precarious state of the educational system in the inner cities of the United States, as well as its potential causes and solutions, have been popular topics of debate in recent years. Part of the difficulty in resolving this debate is the lack of solid empirical evidence regarding the true impact of educational initiatives. The efficacy of so-called “school choice” programs has been a particularly contentious issue. A current multimillion dollar program, the School Choice Scholarship Foundation Program in New York, randomized the distribution of vouchers in an attempt to shed some light on this issue. This is an important time for school choice, because on June 27, 2002 the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of a voucher program in Cleveland that provides scholarships both to secular and religious private schools. Although this study benefits immensely from a randomized design, it suffers from complications common to such research with human subjects: noncompliance with assigned “treatments” and missing data. Recent work has revealed threats to valid estimates of experimental effects that exist in the presence of noncompliance and missing data, even when the goal is to estimate simple intention-to-treat effects. Our goal was to create a better solution when faced with both noncompliance and missing data. This article presents a model that accommodates these complications that is based on the general framework of “principal stratification” and thus relies on more plausible assumptions than standard methodology. Our analyses revealed positive effects on math scores for children who applied to the program from certain types of schools—those with average test scores below the citywide median. Among these children, the effects are stronger for children who applied in the first grade and for African-American children.
Time pressure increases children's aversion to advantageous inequity

John Corbit

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1390741

IF: 3.8

2024-06-06

Frontiers in Psychology

Abstract:The relative contribution of intuitive and reflective cognitive systems in cooperative decision making is a topic of hot debate. Research with adults suggests that intuition often favors cooperation, but these effects are contextually sensitive. Emerging evidence has shown that in many contexts children show a tendency toward intuitive cooperation, but research investigating these processes in children is sparse and has produced mixed findings. In the current study we investigated the influence of intuitive and reflective decision processes on children's fairness behavior by manipulating decision time. We tested ( N = 158) pairs of children between 4 and 10 years of age from a rural community in Canada. Children's decisions to accept or reject allocations of candies were either made under time pressure or after a 10-s delay. We assessed the impact of decision time on children's aversion to inequitable distributions of resources by comparing their responses to equal allocations with either disadvantageous allocations or advantageous allocations. We found that children showed a greater age-related increase in advantageous inequity aversion when decisions were made under time pressure compared to when they were made after a delay. In contrast, we did not observe a significant impact of decision time on the development of disadvantageous inequity aversion. These findings suggest that intuitive decision processes may contribute to the development of fairness concerns in middle childhood.

psychology, multidisciplinary

Characterization of two methylenedioxy bridge-forming cytochrome P450-dependent enzymes of alkaloid formation in the Mexican prickly poppy Argemone mexicana.

Collaboration promotes proportional reasoning about resource distribution in young children.

The Development of Children's Preferences for Equality and Equity Across 13 Individualistic and Collectivist Cultures.

Against unfairness: Young children's judgments about merit, equity, and equality

"This kid looks like he has everything": 3- to 11-year-old children's concerns for fairness and social preferences when peers differ in social class and race

Verification report: Egalitarianism in young children

Children's consideration of effort and outcome in reward distribution tasks

Fast Optimal Algorithms for the Minimum Rectilinear

Chinese Preschoolers' Resource Allocation in the Face of Existing Inequality under Collaborative and Noncollaborative Contexts

Early intergroup coalition: Toddlers attribute fair distributions to Black rather than White distributors

A Developmental-Science Perspective on Social Inequality

Someone who knows and someone I trust: Investigating how and with whom U.S. 8- to 14-year-old youth seek to learn about racial inequality.

"Favoring my playmate seems fair": Inhibitory control and theory of mind in preschoolers' self-disadvantaging behaviors

Distinct Inhibitory-Control Processes Underlie Children's Judgments of Fairness

Korean and American adolescents' judgments of group-based inequalities

A multiplex PCR for detection of genes encoding exfoliative toxins from Staphylococcus hyicus

I2Cnet medical image annotation service.

Intergroup contact and evaluations of race-based exclusion in urban minority children and adolescents

Preschoolers' Group Bias in Punishing Selfishness in the Ultimatum Game.

Principal Stratification Approach to Broken Randomized Experiments

Time pressure increases children's aversion to advantageous inequity