Abstract:A considerable literature on attribution theory has shown that healthy individuals exhibit a positivity bias when inferring the causes of evaluative feedback on their performance. They tend to attribute positive feedback internally (e.g., to their own abilities) but negative feedback externally (e.g., to environmental factors). However, all empirical demonstrations of this bias suffer from at least one of the three following drawbacks: First, participants directly judge explicit causes for their performance. Second, participants have to imagine events instead of experiencing them. Third, participants assess their performance only after receiving feedback and thus differences in baseline assessments cannot be excluded. It is therefore unclear whether the classically reported positivity bias generalizes to setups without these drawbacks. Here, we aimed at establishing the relevance of attributions for decision-making by showing an attribution-related positivity bias in a decision-making task. We developed a novel task, which allowed us to test how participants changed their evaluations in response to positive and negative feedback about performance. Specifically, we used videos of actors expressing different facial emotional expressions. Participants were first asked to evaluate the actors' credibility in expressing a particular emotion. After this initial rating, participants performed an emotion recognition task and did--or did not--receive feedback on their veridical performance. Finally, participants re-rated the actors' credibility, which provided a measure of how they changed their evaluations after feedback. Attribution theory predicts that participants change their evaluations of the actors' credibility toward the positive after receiving positive performance feedback and toward the negative after negative performance feedback. Our results were in line with this prediction. A control condition without feedback showed that correct or incorrect performance alone could not explain the observed positivity bias. Furthermore, participants' behavior in our task was linked to the most widely used measure of attribution style. In sum, our findings suggest that positive and negative performance feedback influences the evaluation of task-related stimuli, as predicted by attribution theory. Therefore, our study points to the relevance of attribution theory for feedback processing in decision-making and provides a novel outlook for decision-making biases.

Defensiveness Toward IAT Feedback Predicts Willingness to Engage in Anti-Bias Behaviors

Responding to feedback about implicit bias

Internal conflict and prejudice-regulation: Emotional ambivalence buffers against defensive responding to implicit bias feedback

"It's not an overreaction": Increasing White people's acceptance of the reality of bias and receptivity to Black people's bias concerns

Reproducibility of Implicit Association Test (IAT) -- Case study of meta-analysis of racial bias research claims

How Can Debiasing Research Aid Efforts to Reduce Discrimination?

Paternalism in the Performance Context: Evaluators Who Feel Social Pressure to Avoid Exhibiting Prejudice Deliver More Inflated Performance Feedback to Women

The development of implicit attitudes. Evidence of race evaluations from ages 6 and 10 and adulthood

Self-protecting motivation, indexed by self-threat, modifies retrieval-induced-forgetting and confidence in employment decision bias against out-group targets

Shifts in Racial Inequalities and White Backlash in the 21st Century U.S.

An Unintentional, Robust, and Replicable Pro-Black Bias in Social Judgment

Effects of Implicit Racial Bias and Standardized Patient Race on Genetic Counseling Students' Patient-Centered Communication

Does attitude importance moderate the effects of person-first language? A registered report

Perceiving others as responsive lessens prejudice: The mediating roles of intellectual humility and attitude ambivalence

The Influence of Parent Behaviors on Positive Illusory Bias in Children With ADHD

Performance Feedback Processing Is Positively Biased As Predicted by Attribution Theory

Examining the effectiveness of interventions to reduce discriminatory behavior at work: An attitude dimension consistency perspective

Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: III. Meta-analysis of predictive validity.

Emotion regulation in response to discrimination: Exploring the role of self-control and impression management emotion-regulation goals

The effects of feedback self-consistency, therapist status, and attitude toward therapy on reaction to personality feedback

A Diffusion Model Approach for Understanding the Impact of 17 Interventions on the Race Implicit Association Test