Abstract:Parental gender bias is critical for the early socialization of gender inequality, and it plays a vital role in women's personality and development. Although the labor market continues to improve and develop, women's career development still faces obstacles from gender bias. Gender inequality at home continues to constrain gender equality at work. However, most current research about the influence of parental gender bias focuses on girls' early childhood and adolescence, neglecting its profound effects on women in the workplace. Identifying the underlying factors that influence women's career choices and performance is key to promoting gender equality in the workplace. Drawing on the self-concept theory, this study aims to examine the serial mediating roles of self-esteem and career compromise in the relationship between parental gender bias and female employees' workplace in-role performance and creativity. We tested our hypothesis using multi-source data collected from female college students recruited from a university in northern China. We collected our data in three separate waves to reduce the impact of common method bias. In the first wave survey (Wave 1), female college students were asked to provide information on their demographics, parental gender bias, and self-esteem. Once they secured a job (Wave 2), the participants were asked to provide information on their career compromise. Three months after they were officially hired after passing the probationary period (Wave 3), female employees were asked to rate the perceived gender bias at work, and supervisors evaluated their in- role performance and creativity. Finally, we reviewed 225 valid matching questionnaires. We used structural equation modeling in Mplus 8 for data analyses and hypotheses testings. The results showed that: (1) parental gender bias was negatively related to women's self-esteem; (2) self-esteem was negatively related to women's career compromise; (3) self- esteem mediated the relationship between parental gender bias and women's career compromise; (4) career compromise was negatively related to women's in-role performance/creativity; (5) women's self- esteem and career compromise serially mediated the relationship between parental gender bias and in- role performance/creativity. Our findings contribute to the current literature in several ways. First, this study focuses on the more fundamental factor of early socialization-parental gender bias, to identify antecedents that prevent women from becoming high- performing and creative employees. This temporal independence allows for a clearer causal relationship and expands the research perspective on female career development barriers. Existing literature has also emerged on the influence of parents on individuals upon entry into the workplace. Our study complements the literature on the influence of upbringing on workplace performance. Second, this study reveals that parental gender bias negatively affects women's workplace performance through self-esteem and career compromise, and that there is no difference in the effects of fathers and mothers. In doing so, we provide a two- fold expansion and addition to the literature on the far-reaching effects of parenting styles. On the one hand, this study provides a useful addition to previous studies that have mainly focused on maternal gender bias. On the other hand, our study expands the influence of fathers' parenting on children after they enter the workplace. Third, external (parental gender bias) and internal ( self-esteem) factors are combined to identify women's career decision-making mechanisms in response to previous scholars' call. Furthermore, this study explores in-role performance and creativity, which are more conducive to women's career development, enriching previous research on the negative outcomes of career compromise.

Paternalism in the Performance Context: Evaluators Who Feel Social Pressure to Avoid Exhibiting Prejudice Deliver More Inflated Performance Feedback to Women

Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment

Performance-related feedback as a strategy to overcome spontaneous occupational stereotypes

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

When Performance Trumps Gender Bias: Joint vs. Separate Evaluation

Performance Feedback Processing Is Positively Biased As Predicted by Attribution Theory

Lost Radiance: Negative Influence of Parental Gender Bias on Women's Workplace Performance

Reporting Only the Good News but Not the Bad? Mechanism of Negative Performance Feedback

Feedback with feeling? How emotional language in feedback affects individual performance

The interactive effect of positive inequity and regulatory focus on work performance

Testing the GRIP: An Empirical Examination of the Gender Roles Inhibiting Prosociality Model

Performance Feedback and Peer Effects

Daily feedback suspicion and ability-uncertainty among junior researchers in competitive work climates in STEM

Responding to feedback about implicit bias

The Giver's Perspective: Advancing Feedback Research with a New Focus

Perpetuating Inequality: Junior Women Do Not See Queen Bee Behavior as Negative but Are Nonetheless Negatively Affected by It

'Good job!' The impact of positive and negative feedback on performance

One Who Wishes to Wear the Crown, Must Bear Its Weight: How Performance Pressure Benefits Career-Prospective Employees in Organizations

Sex, age, and equity behavior.

Chivalry’s Double-edged Sword: How Girls’ and Boys’ Paternalistic Attitudes Relate to Their Possible Family and Work Selves

Bias intervention messaging in student evaluations of teaching: The role of gendered perceptions of bias