Abstract:A considerable literature on attribution theory has shown that healthy individuals exhibit a positivity bias when inferring the causes of evaluative feedback on their performance. They tend to attribute positive feedback internally (e.g., to their own abilities) but negative feedback externally (e.g., to environmental factors). However, all empirical demonstrations of this bias suffer from at least one of the three following drawbacks: First, participants directly judge explicit causes for their performance. Second, participants have to imagine events instead of experiencing them. Third, participants assess their performance only after receiving feedback and thus differences in baseline assessments cannot be excluded. It is therefore unclear whether the classically reported positivity bias generalizes to setups without these drawbacks. Here, we aimed at establishing the relevance of attributions for decision-making by showing an attribution-related positivity bias in a decision-making task. We developed a novel task, which allowed us to test how participants changed their evaluations in response to positive and negative feedback about performance. Specifically, we used videos of actors expressing different facial emotional expressions. Participants were first asked to evaluate the actors' credibility in expressing a particular emotion. After this initial rating, participants performed an emotion recognition task and did--or did not--receive feedback on their veridical performance. Finally, participants re-rated the actors' credibility, which provided a measure of how they changed their evaluations after feedback. Attribution theory predicts that participants change their evaluations of the actors' credibility toward the positive after receiving positive performance feedback and toward the negative after negative performance feedback. Our results were in line with this prediction. A control condition without feedback showed that correct or incorrect performance alone could not explain the observed positivity bias. Furthermore, participants' behavior in our task was linked to the most widely used measure of attribution style. In sum, our findings suggest that positive and negative performance feedback influences the evaluation of task-related stimuli, as predicted by attribution theory. Therefore, our study points to the relevance of attribution theory for feedback processing in decision-making and provides a novel outlook for decision-making biases.

Performance Feedback Processing Is Positively Biased As Predicted by Attribution Theory

The Process of Performance Attribution and Its Influence on Poor Performance Evaluation

Effort provides its own reward: endeavors reinforce subjective expectation and evaluation of task performance

Feedback with feeling? How emotional language in feedback affects individual performance

Disappearance of Self-Serving Bias: Reward Positivity Reflects Performance Monitoring Modulated by Responsibility Attribution in a Two-Person Cooperative Task.

'Good job!' The impact of positive and negative feedback on performance

Biased interpretation of performance feedback: The role of CEO overconfidence

Supervisor Negative Feedback and Employee Motivation to Learn: an Attribution Perspective

Insensitivity to Success and Failure: an Experimental Study of Performance-Based Feedback in Depression.

Improving the effectiveness of performance feedback by considering personality traits and task demands

The Positivity Bias Phenomenon in Face Perception Given Different Information on Ability

Using a Feedback Environment to Improve Creative Performance: A Dynamic Affect Perspective

Paternalism in the Performance Context: Evaluators Who Feel Social Pressure to Avoid Exhibiting Prejudice Deliver More Inflated Performance Feedback to Women

Brain Responses in Evaluating Feedback Stimuli with a Social Dimension.

Performance prediction and performance-based task allocation

Effects of positive and negative social feedback on motivation, evaluative learning, and socio-emotional processing

Can the induction of incidental positive emotions lead to different performances in sequential decision-making?

The Enhancing Effect of Overconfidence on Subsequent Learning Performance: Potential Mediation Effects of Dissatisfaction and Effort

Whether and how to regulate: Emotion regulation in negative-feedback situations.

Organizational responses to performance feedback: A meta-analytic review

The contribution of sensory information asymmetry and bias of attribution to egocentric tendencies in effort comparison tasks