Abstract:Previous studies have shown that people would like to sacrifice benefits to themselves in order to avoid inequitable outcomes, not only when they receive less than others (disadvantageous inequity aversion) but also when they receive more (advantageous inequity aversion). This feature is captured by the theory of inequity aversion. The present study was inspired by what appears to be asymmetry in the research paradigm toward advantageous inequity aversion. Specifically, studies that supported the existence of advantageous inequity aversion always relied on the paradigm in which participants can determine allocations. Thus, it is interesting to know what would occur if participants could not determine allocations or simply passed judgment on predetermined allocations. To address this, a behavioral experiment (N = 118) and a skin conductance response (SCR) experiment (N = 29) were adopted to compare participants' preferences for advantageous inequity directly when allocations were determined and when allocations were predetermined in an allocating task. In the determined condition, participants could divide by themselves a sum of money between themselves and a matched person, whereas in the predetermined condition, they could simply indicate their satisfaction with an equivalent program-generated allocation. It was found that, compared with those in the determined condition, participants in the predetermined condition behaved as if they liked the advantageous inequity and equity to the same degree (Experiment One) and that the SCRs elicited by advantageous inequity had no differences from those elicited by equity, suggesting that participants did not feel negatively toward advantageous inequity in this situation (Experiment Two). The present study provided mutual corroboration (behavioral and electrophysiological data) to document that advantageous inequity aversion may differ as a function of the individual's role in determining allocations, and it would disappear if individual cannot determine allocations.

The interactive effect of positive inequity and regulatory focus on work performance

Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: the Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity

Empowering Leadership Boosts Employee Innovative Job Performance: Unraveling the Role of Work Stress and Regulatory Focus

Give Me a Chance! Sense of Opportunity Inequality Affects Brain Responses to Outcome Evaluation in a Social Competitive Context: An Event-Related Potential Study

Who Are You More Likely to Help? the Effects of Expected Outcomes and Regulatory Focus on Prosocial Performance.

Is Shooting for Fairness Always Beneficial? the Influence of Promotion Fairness on Employees' Cognitive and Emotional Reactions to Promotion Failure

A Cognitive Evaluation and Equity-Based Perspective of Pay for Performance on Job Performance: A Meta-Analysis and Path Model

A self-regulation perspective on how and when regulatory focus differentially relates to citizenship behaviors.

The Influence of Regulatory Focus of Supervisors and Subordinates on the Performance of the Subordinates

Helping but Also Deviance! Why Does Promotion-Oriented Job Crafting Lead to Two Distinct Behaviors?

Role of regulatory focus in the asymmetric perception of gains versus nonlosses and of losses versus nongains

Pay Inequity Effects on Back-Office Employees' Job Performances: the Case of A Large Insurance Firm

Pay Inequity and Job Performance: An Insider-Econometrics Study

Shooting for Fairness is Always Beneficial? Why and when Promotion Failure Affects Work Engagement

Realizing Challenges and Guarding Against Threats: Interactive Effects of Regulatory Focus and Stress on Performance

Why does advantageous inequity promote prosocial behavior? The roles of justice sensitivity and guilt

Reporting Only the Good News but Not the Bad? Mechanism of Negative Performance Feedback

Workplace Conflict, Status-conferral Criteria and Job Performance: Status Competition Perspective

Does Overqualification Play a Promoting or a Hindering Role? the Impact of Public Employees' Perceived Overqualification on Workplace Behaviors.

The influence of differential leadership and proactive personality on employee in-role performance: An integrated model

The Sweet Side of Inequality: How Advantageous Status Modulates Empathic Response to Others' Gains and Losses.