The Distribution of Earnings and the Rules of the Game
PK Porter,GW Scully
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1061310
1996-01-01
Southern Economic Journal
Abstract:Extensive research links the distribution of earnings to a variety of exogenous and endogenous factors: innate ability, motivation, acquired human capital, skill, occupation, race, sex, unionization, mobility, work-leisure preference, risk preference, luck, and so on. Overlooked in the analysis of income inequality is the institutional technology, or constitutional setting, or rules of the game in which income is earned. One of the authors [11] has examined the effect of differences in the degree of economic, legal (civil rights), and political freedom on income inequality across nations. He found that a substantial portion of the variance in income inequality was due to differences in the rights of various groups to compete for income streams. Much of constitutional history's evolution can be interpreted as investing previously unequal groups (peasants, blacks, women, the disabled, and so on) with equal rights to compete for income streams. In general, individuals are endowed with, or acquire through investment and training, that can be utilized in productive activities. The realization of an individual's in an activity is his or her performance. The dimensions of are too numerous, and perhaps too mysterious, to be precisely quantified. But, it is convenient to think of as being composed of broad dimensions like intelligence, strength and coordination, and of further refinements of these dimensions (e.g., language, math, or reasoning ability). In this way, an individual's talent for a particular activity can be thought of as a weighted total of the dimensional attributes he or she possesses, where the weight in each dimension is determined by the demands of the activity. Performance is the realization of plus a random component. Its expectation is an exact proxy for talent. Any discrepancy between and expected performance is the result of omitting relevant attributes of talent. For example, ignoring the intangible attributes of (determination, intensity, hustle) that contribute to one's success leads to the apparent observations of individuals that fail to perform at levels commensurate with their and individuals whose performance appears to surpass the measure of their talent. It must be said of the former that they are talented but lack something, say, concentration and of the latter that they make up for a lack of with something else, for example, effort. When the abilities to concentrate