Abstract:The persistence of racial inequality in the U.S. labor market against a general backdrop of formal equality of opportunity is a troubling phenomenon that has significant ramifications on the design of hiring policies. In this paper, we show that current group disparate outcomes may be immovable even when hiring decisions are bound by an input-output notion of "individual fairness." Instead, we construct a dynamic reputational model of the labor market that illustrates the reinforcing nature of asymmetric outcomes resulting from groups' divergent accesses to resources and as a result, investment choices. To address these disparities, we adopt a dual labor market composed of a Temporary Labor Market (TLM), in which firms' hiring strategies are constrained to ensure statistical parity of workers granted entry into the pipeline, and a Permanent Labor Market (PLM), in which firms hire top performers as desired. Individual worker reputations produce externalities for their group; the corresponding feedback loop raises the collective reputation of the initially disadvantaged group via a TLM fairness intervention that need not be permanent. We show that such a restriction on hiring practices induces an equilibrium that, under particular market conditions, Pareto-dominates those arising from strategies that statistically discriminate or employ a "group-blind" criterion. The enduring nature of equilibria that are both inequitable and Pareto suboptimal suggests that fairness interventions beyond procedural checks of hiring decisions will be of critical importance in a world where machines play a greater role in the employment process.

Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers

Accounting for the Gap: A Firm Study Manipulating Organizational Accountability and Transparency in Pay Decisions

“They Never Had a Chance”: Unequal Opportunities and Fair Redistributions

Shallow Meritocracy

Diversity and the Evaluation of Talent in the Accounting Profession: The Enigma of Merit

Double Jeopardy?: The Interaction of Gender and Race on Earnings in the United States

A Reflection on Meritocracy Discourse from the Perspective of Educational Equality and Attribution Theory

The gender equity gap: A multistudy investigation of within-job inequality in equity-based awards.

Can selecting the most qualified candidate be unfair? Learning about socioeconomic advantages and disadvantages reduces the perceived fairness of meritocracy and increases support for socioeconomic diversity initiatives in organizations.

Inside the Black Box of Organizational Life: The Gendered Language of Performance Assessment

Meritocracy and Its Discontents: Long-run Effects of Repeated School Admission Reforms

In Search of Excellence and Equity in Physics

Meritocracy, Elitism and Inequality

Economic Inequality and Belief in Meritocracy in the United States

‘Grand challenge’ or ‘not an issue’? The discourses on income inequality of compensation managers and consultants

Double standards in promotion and tenure

A Short-term Intervention for Long-term Fairness in the Labor Market

Gender and cultural bias in student evaluations: Why representation matters

Born in the USA: How immigrant generation shapes meritocracy and its relation to ethnic identity and collective action.

Racial Inequality in Academia: Systemic Origins, Modern Challenges, and Policy Recommendations

Gender differences in research grant allocation -- a mixed picture