Abstract:Two landmark episodes of the last decade, the 2001 dot‐com crisis and the 2008 bursting of the housing bubble, have drawn attention to the size and structure of executive pay plans and their possible role in propagating or worsening the crises. In this policy‐oriented piece, the authors discuss the key issues in the debate on executive pay and express their support for a number of reform proposals that have been advanced in academic and policy circles. The article begins by dividing the compensation debate into four key issues: First, while public outrage has focused on the size of the pay packages at failed financial institutions, it is perhaps more important to focus on the structure of compensation and the process of setting compensation to prevent future crises. An effective pay package is not necessarily the one most laden with equity incentives. Too much equity exposure can cause excessive risk‐taking, manipulation, and shift executive attention away from true value creation. Second, incentive structures should incorporate indexing and clawbacks to guard against the possibility that performance benchmarks are rewarding luck more than sustainable, long‐run performance. Third, the compensation‐setting process should be placed in the hands of shareholders, boards, and advisors who are not only independent but also possess ample expertise in the financial instruments used to incentivize pay. Fourth and finally, any proposals for changes in compensation design or the taxation of compensation should anticipate how executives will alter their behavior in response to the changes, and evaluate the effect of the changes net of such offsetting responses. First, while public outrage has focused on the size of the pay packages at failed financial institutions, it is perhaps more important to focus on the structure of compensation and the process of setting compensation to prevent future crises. An effective pay package is not necessarily the one most laden with equity incentives. Too much equity exposure can cause excessive risk‐taking, manipulation, and shift executive attention away from true value creation. Second, incentive structures should incorporate indexing and clawbacks to guard against the possibility that performance benchmarks are rewarding luck more than sustainable, long‐run performance. Third, the compensation‐setting process should be placed in the hands of shareholders, boards, and advisors who are not only independent but also possess ample expertise in the financial instruments used to incentivize pay. Fourth and finally, any proposals for changes in compensation design or the taxation of compensation should anticipate how executives will alter their behavior in response to the changes, and evaluate the effect of the changes net of such offsetting responses.

‘Grand challenge’ or ‘not an issue’? The discourses on income inequality of compensation managers and consultants

Moderating Effects on the Compensation Gap Between Locals and Expatriates in China: A Multi-Level Analysis

Pay Disparity In Multinational And Domestic Firms In China: The Role Of Pro-Disparity Norm

Effects of CEO Identity on Non-family Managers’ Pay Dispersion in Family Firms: A Social Comparison Perspective

Pay Transparency: Advancing Theory and Empirical Knowledge

Measuring Compensation System Structure: The Interrelation Between Equitable Pay and Firm Performance

Performance Principle and Organizational Compensation Practice in the Context of the Global Financial Crisis: A Discourse-analytical Study

Gender, Race, and Meritocracy in Organizational Careers

DIRECTORS’ COMPENSATION. WHAT REALLY MATTERS?

Executive Compensation: An Overview of Research on Corporate Practices and Proposed Reforms

The Driver of Workplace Alienation or the Cost of Effective Stewardship? The Consequences of Wage Gap for Corporate Performance

They don't really care about us: the impact of perceived vertical pay disparity on employee well-being

Is There a Research–Practice Gap in Compensation Management?

Accounting for the Gap: A Firm Study Manipulating Organizational Accountability and Transparency in Pay Decisions

Relative Wealth Concerns, Executive Compensation, and Systemic Risk-Taking

Diversity and the Evaluation of Talent in the Accounting Profession: The Enigma of Merit

The contingent value of pay inequalities in sales organizations: integrating literatures in economics, management, and psychology

The Effect of Horizontal Pay Transparency on Employee Motivation When Pay Dispersion Is Performance Based and Non-Performance Based

Egalitarianism and Executive Compensation: A Relational Argument

“They Never Had a Chance”: Unequal Opportunities and Fair Redistributions

The Social-Origins Gap in Labour Market Outcomes: Compensatory and Boosting Advantages Using a Micro-Class Approach