Abstract:Previous studies have shown that people would like to sacrifice benefits to themselves in order to avoid inequitable outcomes, not only when they receive less than others (disadvantageous inequity aversion) but also when they receive more (advantageous inequity aversion). This feature is captured by the theory of inequity aversion. The present study was inspired by what appears to be asymmetry in the research paradigm toward advantageous inequity aversion. Specifically, studies that supported the existence of advantageous inequity aversion always relied on the paradigm in which participants can determine allocations. Thus, it is interesting to know what would occur if participants could not determine allocations or simply passed judgment on predetermined allocations. To address this, a behavioral experiment (N = 118) and a skin conductance response (SCR) experiment (N = 29) were adopted to compare participants' preferences for advantageous inequity directly when allocations were determined and when allocations were predetermined in an allocating task. In the determined condition, participants could divide by themselves a sum of money between themselves and a matched person, whereas in the predetermined condition, they could simply indicate their satisfaction with an equivalent program-generated allocation. It was found that, compared with those in the determined condition, participants in the predetermined condition behaved as if they liked the advantageous inequity and equity to the same degree (Experiment One) and that the SCRs elicited by advantageous inequity had no differences from those elicited by equity, suggesting that participants did not feel negatively toward advantageous inequity in this situation (Experiment Two). The present study provided mutual corroboration (behavioral and electrophysiological data) to document that advantageous inequity aversion may differ as a function of the individual's role in determining allocations, and it would disappear if individual cannot determine allocations.

The Sweet Side of Inequality: How Advantageous Status Modulates Empathic Response to Others' Gains and Losses.

Advantageous Inequity Aversion Does Not Always Exist: the Role of Determining Allocations Modulates Preferences for Advantageous Inequity

Empathic Responses to Others’ Gains and Losses: an Electrophysiological Investigation

To Run with the Herd or Not: Electrophysiological Dynamics Are Associated with Preference Change in Crowdfunding

Give Me a Chance! Sense of Opportunity Inequality Affects Brain Responses to Outcome Evaluation in a Social Competitive Context: An Event-Related Potential Study

Neural evidence for inequality-averse social preferences

Ultrastructural observations on the infection of rat liver by Plasmodium berghei sporozoites in vivo.

Distinguishing neural correlates of context-dependent advantageous- and disadvantageous-inequity aversion

Deliberate or Unintended: Intentions Modulate Empathic Responses to Others’ Economic Payoffs in Social Interactions

You Are Excusable! Neural Correlates of Economic Neediness on Empathic Concern and Fairness Perception.

Social status modulates the neural response to unfairness

Influence of HIV Infection on Mortality in a Cohort of Patients Treated for Tuberculosis in the Context of Wide Access to HAART, in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil

Neural Responses to Perceived Pain in Others Predict Real-Life Monetary Donations in Different Socioeconomic Contexts

The Different Role of Trait Empathy and State Social Exclusion Empathy on Subsequent Feelings about Gambling Outcome：evidence from Event-Related Potentials and Time-Frequency Decompositions

P2 Manifests Subjective Evaluation of Reward Processing Under Social Comparison

Impact of Empathic Concern on Prosocial Behavior in Gain and Loss Contexts: Evidence from Event-Related Potential

Increased Neural Responses to Unfairness in a Loss Context

The effect of economic status on responses to unfairness: A rs-fMRI study

Gender differences in empathic responses to others’ economic payoffs: an event-related potentials study

Inequality signals in dorsolateral prefrontal cortex inform social preference models

Context Modulates Perceived Fairness in Altruistic Punishment: Neural Signatures from ERPs and EEG Oscillations