Differential effects of MoO3 and MoO2 sacrificial layer on J-V performance of Cu2ZnSn (S, Se)4 solar cells

Jinhui Zhang,Chuanhe Ma,Haixuan Gao,Jinchun Jiang,Hailong Wang
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1039/d3se01409f
IF: 6.813
2023-12-15
Sustainable Energy & Fuels
Abstract:Over-thick MoSe2 layer and numerous voids at the absorbing layer inside and backside lead to relatively low Jsc and PCE of CZTSSe solar cells. In the prior art, MoO2 and MoO3 sacrificial layers are commonly used to eliminate those voids and reduce the thickness of MoSe2 layers, but there is still fierce debate about their effectiveness. In this work, we prepared MoO2 and MoO3 sacrificial layers on the surface of Mo-coated SLG substrates by air annealing and ammonia (NH3H2O) etching, respectively. J-V testing shows that both MoO2 and MoO3 can effectively improve the Jsc and PCE of CZTSSe solar cells, wherein MoO3 is more excellent. Through comparative analysis, it is found that the electrical mechanism of Jsc and PCE improvement lies in the significant reduction of device series resistance (Rs). SEM images and XRD pattern results indicate that the reason for Rs decreasing is void elimination and MoSe2 layer thickness reduction from 600 nm to 270 nm after applying MoO3. With the aid of the MoO3 sacrificial layer, the PCE of the CZTSSe device increases from 7.51% to 9.58% (total area 0.21 cm2) without the MgF2 anti-reflection layer.
materials science, multidisciplinary,chemistry, physical,energy & fuels
What problem does this paper attempt to address?