Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

A new perspective for understanding generalization gap of deep neural networks trained with large batch sizes

On Large-Batch Training for Deep Learning: Generalization Gap and Sharp Minima

Understanding deep learning (still) requires rethinking generalization

Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learning

Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization

Generalization of Scaled Deep ResNets in the Mean-Field Regime

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

Inconsistency, Instability, and Generalization Gap of Deep Neural Network Training

Theoretical analysis of skip connections and batch normalization from generalization and optimization perspectives

A Closer Look at Batch Size in Mini-batch Training of Deep Auto-Encoders

Why Does Large Batch Training Result in Poor Generalization? A Comprehensive Explanation and a Better Strategy from the Viewpoint of Stochastic Optimization

Understanding Why Neural Networks Generalize Well Through GSNR of Parameters

Algorithm-Dependent Generalization Bounds for Overparameterized Deep Residual Networks

The Effect of Network Width on the Performance of Large-batch Training

Disentangling Trainability and Generalization in Deep Neural Networks

Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks

Theory IIIb: Generalization in Deep Networks

Exact, Tractable Gauss-Newton Optimization in Deep Reversible Architectures Reveal Poor Generalization

Large Margin Deep Neural Networks: Theory and Algorithms.

Enabling Large Batch Size Training for DNN Models Beyond the Memory Limit While Maintaining Performance

Explaining generalization in deep learning: progress and fundamental limits