Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Understanding Training and Generalization in Deep Learning by Fourier Analysis.

Disentangling Trainability and Generalization in Deep Neural Networks

Frequency Principle: Fourier Analysis Sheds Light on Deep Neural Networks

Towards Understanding Generalization of Deep Learning: Perspective of Loss Landscapes.

Training Behavior of Deep Neural Network in Frequency Domain.

A Fourier-based Framework for Domain Generalization

Going Deeper, Generalizing Better: an Information-Theoretic View for Deep Learning.

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

A new perspective for understanding generalization gap of deep neural networks trained with large batch sizes

Theory IIIb: Generalization in Deep Networks

Theoretical analysis of skip connections and batch normalization from generalization and optimization perspectives

Intrinsic Dimension, Persistent Homology and Generalization in Neural Networks

Explaining generalization in deep learning: progress and fundamental limits

Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization

Understanding deep learning (still) requires rethinking generalization

Inconsistency, Instability, and Generalization Gap of Deep Neural Network Training

Theory of the Frequency Principle for General Deep Neural Networks

Learning Curves for Deep Neural Networks: A Gaussian Field Theory Perspective

Why Do Deep Residual Networks Generalize Better than Deep Feedforward Networks? -- A Neural Tangent Kernel Perspective

Theoretical Issues in Deep Networks: Approximation, Optimization and Generalization

Understanding Why Neural Networks Generalize Well Through GSNR of Parameters