Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Theoretical analysis of skip connections and batch normalization from generalization and optimization perspectives

Rethinking Skip Connection with Layer Normalization in Transformers and ResNets

A new perspective for understanding generalization gap of deep neural networks trained with large batch sizes

Optimization of Graph Neural Networks: Implicit Acceleration by Skip Connections and More Depth

Rethinking the Usage of Batch Normalization and Dropout in the Training of Deep Neural Networks

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

Order and Chaos: NTK views on DNN Normalization, Checkerboard and Boundary Artifacts

Functional Network: A Novel Framework for Interpretability of Deep Neural Networks

Effective and Efficient Batch Normalization Using a Few Uncorrelated Data for Statistics Estimation

Beyond BatchNorm: Towards a Unified Understanding of Normalization in Deep Learning

Research Progress on Batch Normalization of Deep Learning and Its Related Algorithms

Rethinking Residual Connection with Layer Normalization

Normalization Techniques in Training DNNs: Methodology, Analysis and Application

Understanding the Disharmony Between Dropout and Batch Normalization by Variance Shift.

Exponential convergence rates for Batch Normalization: The power of length-direction decoupling in non-convex optimization

Diminishing Batch Normalization

Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks

Algorithm-Dependent Generalization Bounds for Overparameterized Deep Residual Networks

Generalized Batch Normalization: Towards Accelerating Deep Neural Networks

Theory IIIb: Generalization in Deep Networks