Abstract:Deep neural networks (DNNs) have achieved state-of-the-art performance in various learning tasks, such as computer vision, natural language processing, and speech recognition. However, the fundamental theory of generalization still remains obscure in deep learning-why DNN models can generalize well, despite that they are heavily overparametrized in both depth and width? Recently, some work shows that traditional theory of analyzing the generalization error of learning models fails to explain the generalization of DNNs. The failure is mainly because of one simple fact that the worse case analysis of generalization error for learning models would be too loose for models with large parameter space, such as DNNs. In this work, we propose a new analysis of generalization in DNNs from an optimal transport perspective. Unlike traditional worse-case uniform convergence analysis in learning theory, our analysis of generalization error is dependent on both the learning algorithm and the data distribution and is the average-case analysis. Thus, our theory can be more practical and accurate to describe the generalization behavior of DNNs. More specifically, in this article, we try to answer a fundamental yet unsolved question in deep learning-why deeper models can generalize well than shallow models? The main contribution of this article can be summarized in four aspects. First, under a general learning framework, we derive upper bounds on the generalization error of learning algorithms by their algorithmic transport cost: the expected Wasserstein distance between the output hypothesis and the output hypothesis conditioned on an input example. We further provide several upper bounds on the algorithmic transport cost in terms of total variation distance, relative entropy, and Vapnik-Chervonenkis (VC) dimension. Moreover, we also study different conditions for loss functions under which the generalization error of a learning algorithm can be upper bounded by different probability metrics between distributions relating to the output hypothesis and/or the input data. Finally, under our established framework, we obtain our main results, showing that the generalization error in DNNs decreases exponentially to zero as the number of layers increases.

Generalization of Scaled Deep ResNets in the Mean-Field Regime

A new perspective for understanding generalization gap of deep neural networks trained with large batch sizes

Information-Theoretic Generalization Bounds for Deep Neural Networks

Generalization Error of Graph Neural Networks in the Mean-field Regime

Scaling description of generalization with number of parameters in deep learning

Explaining generalization in deep learning: progress and fundamental limits

Sparsity-aware generalization theory for deep neural networks

Modeling from Features: a Mean-field Framework for Over-parameterized Deep Neural Networks

Understanding deep learning (still) requires rethinking generalization

Theory IIIb: Generalization in Deep Networks

Towards Understanding Generalization of Deep Learning: Perspective of Loss Landscapes.

Why ResNet Works? Residuals Generalize

Mean-field Analysis of Generalization Errors

Disentangling Trainability and Generalization in Deep Neural Networks

Understanding the training of infinitely deep and wide ResNets with Conditional Optimal Transport

Theoretical Investigation of Generalization Bound for Residual Networks.

Understanding deep learning requires rethinking generalization

An Optimal Transport Analysis on Generalization in Deep Learning

A Mean Field Theory of Batch Normalization

Why Do Deep Residual Networks Generalize Better than Deep Feedforward Networks? -- A Neural Tangent Kernel Perspective

Algorithm-Dependent Generalization Bounds for Overparameterized Deep Residual Networks