Competition between insulation and phase change material to intensify the resilience of envelope against heat exchange to reduce overall energy consumption in buildings
Naeim Farouk Samah. G. Babiker a Mechanical Engineering Department,College of Engineering in Al-Kharj,Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University,Al-Kharj,Saudi Arabiab Department of Electronic Physics,Faculty of Applied Science in Port Sudan,Red Sea University,Port Sudan,SudanNaeim Farouk is a full Professor in the Department of Mechanical Engineering at the College of Engineering in Alkharj,Prince Sattam bin Abdulaziz University,Al-Kharj,Saudi Arabia. His research interests include Renewable energy. He has published numerous papers in reputed journals and has been actively involved in various research projects. Corresponding Author: mah. G. Babiker is an Assistant professor in the Department of Electronic Physics at the Faculty of Applied Science in Port Sudan,Red Sea University,Port Sudan,Sudan. Her research focuses on Heat and Mass Transfer. She has contributed significantly to the field through her publications and research activities. Email: samahgas@yahoo.com
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/15567036.2024.2391117
2024-08-20
Energy Sources Part A Recovery Utilization and Environmental Effects
Abstract:In this study, the effectiveness of two techniques was investigated to reduce annual building energy demand (ABED) located in hot and desert climates. In the first technique, thermal insulation was used to boost the thermal resistance of the envelopes, and in the second one, bio-based phase change material ( BioPCMRM27 ) was used. Using numerical methods for five hot and desert regions, the effect of some parameters such as setpoint temperature, installation location, and thermal properties of insulation/PCM on the effectiveness of both techniques were investigated. By installing PCM in the middle layer of the walls, it was found that in 90% of the cases, the first technique had better effectiveness than the second technique in reducing ABED. To enhance PCM efficiency relative to insulation, three approaches were explored: increasing thickness, altering thermal properties, and optimizing installation location. Based on the results, the first two approaches did not yield substantial enhancements in PCM efficacy compared to insulation. The location of PCM installation is very effective in its effectiveness. By installing PCM in different places, it was observed that the presence of PCM in the outermost layer maximizes its effectiveness. In this case, the second technique is more efficient than the first one by 23.63% to 40.4% depending on the climate zone weather.
energy & fuels,engineering, chemical