Fetal growth restriction: current diagnostic criteria, management of pregnancy and labor

M.A. Kurtser,L.G. Sichinava,D.I. Shishkina,O.A. Latyshkevich,L.E. Breusenko,D.S. Spiridonov,,,,,,
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2023-1-5-11
2023-01-01
Abstract:Objective. To prove the advantages of new diagnostic criteria for fetal growth restriction (FGR) with centile assessment of fetal biometric parameters and Doppler parameters of blood flow in the maternal-placental-fetal system. Patients and methods. A retrospective analysis was made of 364 obstetric histories and perinatal outcomes in patients diagnosed with FGR during pregnancy according to the “former” classification. Simultaneously, fetal growth was assessed using the new classification (2022); a comparative analysis of the diagnostic significance of FGR criteria in both classifications was performed. The prospective phase involved 90 patients in whom the diagnosis of FGR was based on the centile assessment of fetal biometric parameters and Doppler parameters. The examination included Doppler ultrasound and computerized cardiotocography. The histological examination of the placenta was carried out in 23 cases of FGR. Results. The use of new diagnostic criteria for FGR based on the centile assessment of fetal biometric parameters and Doppler parameters significantly reduced the rate of false-positive diagnoses of FGR from 40% to 15%. The histological examination of 21 (82%) out of 23 placentas revealed chronic placental insufficiency with equal frequency in the early (32%) and late (37%) phenotype of FGR. Conclusion. Thus, the use of new diagnostic criteria for FGR can improve the fetal growth assessment and optimize pregnancy and labor management tactics, accompanied by a decrease in the rate of unjustified preterm labor, cesarean sections, and improved perinatal outcomes. Key words: fetal growth restriction, classification of fetal growth restriction, small for gestational age
What problem does this paper attempt to address?