Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>Predicting fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a challenge and recent international guidelines by the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM) and the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) differ in their definitions of FGR. Our objective was to compare the prediction of small for gestational age (SGA) and a composite neonatal outcome using the SMFM and ISUOG definitions.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>This was a secondary analysis using data from a prospective study of women referred for growth ultrasound examinations. SMFM and ISUOG practice guidelines were used to define the population of patients with FGR. SMFM guidelines defined FGR as EFW or AC less than 10<sup>th</sup> percentile. ISUOG guidelines included EFW or AC less than 3<sup>rd</sup> percentile with various Doppler parameters including umbilical, uterine and middle cerebral arteries. The primary outcome was the prediction of neonatal SGA and a composite of neonatal morbidity and mortality by the two guidelines. The composite of neonatal morbidity was defined as Grade 3 and 4 interventricular hemorrhage, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal death, pH<7.1, seizure, NICU admission. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive (LR+) and negative (LR‐) likelihood rations) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were determined. The association between the FGR detected by each guideline and adverse neonatal outcomes were assessed using logistic regression. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Of 1054 women meeting inclusion criteria, 137 (13.0%) and 80 (7.6%) were defined as having FGR by SMFM and ISUOG definitions, respectively. For prediction of SGA, the SMFM FGR definition had a higher sensitivity (54.7%) compared to the ISUOG FGR definition (38.1%). The ISUOG FGR definition had the highest specificity (97.1%). LR+ was highest for the ISUOG FGR definition. The SMFM and ISUOG FGR definitions were similarly poor in predicting a composite of neonatal morbidity with sensitivities of 15.1% and 11.5%, respectively.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>The SMFM guideline is associated with a higher detection rate for SGA but at the cost of some reduction in specificity. Both definitions of FGR performed poorly at predicting a composite of neonatal morbidity.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p></section>

Clinical Comparative Analysis of Fetal Growth Restriction With/without Maternal Complications

Clinical value of S/D ratio of umbilical arteries and Z-scores of multiple ultrasound parameters in evaluating fetal growth restriction in pregnant women with gestational diabetes mellitus

Fetal Growth Restriction: Does an Integrated Maternal Hemodynamic-Placental Model Fit Better?

Neonatal Outcomes of Infants Diagnosed with Fetal Growth Restriction during Late Pregnancy versus after Birth

Obstetric and pediatric growth charts for the detection of fetal growth restriction and neonatal adverse outcomes in preterm newborns before 34 weeks of gestation

Comparison of three different international fetal growth restriction definitions in Chinese population

Perinatal Outcomes of Fetuses with Early Growth Restriction, Late Growth Restriction, Small for Gestational Age, and Adequate for Gestational Age

The Genetic and Clinical Outcomes in Fetuses With Isolated Fetal Growth Restriction: A Chinese Single-Center Retrospective Study

Outcome‐based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction

Fetal growth restriction: unresolved issues of risk stratification, early diagnosis, and obstetric management

The Application Value of Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Ultrasound in Fetal Growth Restriction

Clinical value of prenatal screening markers in early pregnancy combined with perinatal characteristics to predict fetal growth restriction

Etiologic evaluation and pregnancy outcomes of fetal growth restriction (FGR) associated with structural malformations

Cerebroplacental blood flow redistribution in monochorionic‐diamniotic twin pregnancies with selective fetal growth restriction

Early-onset fetal growth restriction: comparison of two management protocols in a single tertiary center

Paediatric consequences of fetal growth restriction

Fetal growth restriction: current diagnostic criteria, management of pregnancy and labor

Etiology and perinatal outcome of periviable fetal growth restriction associated with structural or genetic anomaly

If Fetal Growth Restriction Happened in Severe Early - Onset Preeclampsia is a Measure of Severity of Disease.

Comprehensive evaluation of fetal renal ultrasound parameters for fetal growth restriction

A Summary of Chinese Expert Consensus on Fetal Growth Restriction (an Update on the 2019 Version)