Stanley Krippner, PhD. Medicine and the inner realities. Interview by Bonnie Horrigan.

S. Krippner

1997-11-01

Alternative therapies in health and medicine

Abstract:

What problem does this paper attempt to address?

Hereditary and environmental factors influencing on the serum uric acid throughout ten years population study in Japan.

K. Nishioka,K. Mikanagi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-9140-5_25

Advances in experimental medicine and biology

Abstract:
Selective Fetal Growth Restriction Type III: Application of a Recent Expert Consensus Definition

Sami R Chmait,Martha A Monson,Lisa M Korst,Arlyn Llanes,Andrew H Chon

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/jum.15847

Abstract:Objectives: Per a recent expert definition, diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic diamniotic twins is based on an estimated fetal weight (EFW) <3% as sole criterion and/or combinations of 4 contributory criteria (1 twin EFW <10%; 1 twin abdominal circumference <10%; EFW discordance ≥25%; and smaller twin umbilical artery [UA] pulsatility index >95th percentile). We assessed these criteria in sFGR Type III (intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic flow of the UA [iAREDF]) patients to test whether meeting the more stringent parameters of the consensus definition had worse outcomes, that is, progression to sFGR Type II (persistent AREDF) or twin-twin transfusion syndrome; or secondarily, decreased dual survivorship. Methods: This was a retrospective study of referred sFGR Type III patients (2006-2017). Patients were retrospectively categorized using consensus criteria for 2 comparisons: 1) EFW <3% versus remaining cohort; 2) EFW <3% or met all 4 contributory criteria versus remaining cohort. Results: Forty-eight patients were studied. Comparison 1: EFW <3% patients (58.3%) were not more likely to demonstrate disease progression (46.4% versus 65.0%, P = .2489) or worse dual survivorship (78.6% versus 85.0%, P = .7161). Comparison 2: EFW <3% or met all 4 contributory criteria (75.0%) patients were not more likely than the others to demonstrate progression (44.4% versus 83.3%, P = .0235) or worse dual survivorship (80.6% versus 83.3%, P = 1.0000). Conclusions: In a referred cohort of sFGR Type III patients, there was no evidence that meeting more stringent parameters of the consensus definition was associated with disease progression or dual survivorship.
Outcome‐based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction

J. T. Roeckner,K. Pressman,L. Odibo,J. R. Duncan,A. O. Odibo

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.23638

2021-06-01

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:<section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Objective</h3><p>Predicting fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a challenge and recent international guidelines by the Society of Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM) and the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG) differ in their definitions of FGR. Our objective was to compare the prediction of small for gestational age (SGA) and a composite neonatal outcome using the SMFM and ISUOG definitions.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Methods</h3><p>This was a secondary analysis using data from a prospective study of women referred for growth ultrasound examinations. SMFM and ISUOG practice guidelines were used to define the population of patients with FGR. SMFM guidelines defined FGR as EFW or AC less than 10<sup>th</sup> percentile. ISUOG guidelines included EFW or AC less than 3<sup>rd</sup> percentile with various Doppler parameters including umbilical, uterine and middle cerebral arteries. The primary outcome was the prediction of neonatal SGA and a composite of neonatal morbidity and mortality by the two guidelines. The composite of neonatal morbidity was defined as Grade 3 and 4 interventricular hemorrhage, respiratory distress syndrome, neonatal death, pH<7.1, seizure, NICU admission. Test characteristics (sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and positive (LR+) and negative (LR‐) likelihood rations) and area under the ROC curve (AUC) were determined. The association between the FGR detected by each guideline and adverse neonatal outcomes were assessed using logistic regression. </p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Results</h3><p>Of 1054 women meeting inclusion criteria, 137 (13.0%) and 80 (7.6%) were defined as having FGR by SMFM and ISUOG definitions, respectively. For prediction of SGA, the SMFM FGR definition had a higher sensitivity (54.7%) compared to the ISUOG FGR definition (38.1%). The ISUOG FGR definition had the highest specificity (97.1%). LR+ was highest for the ISUOG FGR definition. The SMFM and ISUOG FGR definitions were similarly poor in predicting a composite of neonatal morbidity with sensitivities of 15.1% and 11.5%, respectively.</p></section><section class="article-section__content"><h3 class="article-section__sub-title section1"> Conclusion</h3><p>The SMFM guideline is associated with a higher detection rate for SGA but at the cost of some reduction in specificity. Both definitions of FGR performed poorly at predicting a composite of neonatal morbidity.</p><p>This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.</p></section>

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Diagnosis and management of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies: A cross-sectional international survey

Smriti Prasad,Asma Khalil,Jamie J Kirkham,Andrew Sharp,Kerry Woolfall,Tracy Karen Mitchell,Odai Yaghi,Tracey Ricketts,Mariana Popa,Zarko Alfirevic,Dilly Anumba,Richard Ashcroft,George Attilakos,Carolyn Bailie,Ahmet A Baschat,Christine Cornforth,Fabricio Da Silva Costa,Mark Denbow,Jan Deprest,Natasha Fenwick,Monique C Haak,Louise Hardman,Jane Harrold,Andy Healey,Kurt Hecher,Rajeswari Parasuraman,Lawrence Impey,Richard Jackson,Edward Johnstone,Shauna Leven,Liesbeth Lewi,Enrico Lopriore,Isabella Oconnor,Danielle Harding,Joel Marsden,Jessica Mendoza,Tommy Mousa,Surabhi Nanda,Aris T Papageorghiou,Dharmintra Pasupathy,Jane Sandall,Shakila Thangaratinam,Baskaran Thilaganathan,Mark Turner,Brigitte Vollmer,Michelle Watson,Karen Wilding,Yoav Yinon,FERN Study Team

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.17891

Abstract:Objective: To identify current practices in the management of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. Design: Cross-sectional survey. Setting: International. Population: Clinicians involved in the management of MCDA twin pregnancies with sFGR. Methods: A structured, self-administered survey. Main outcome measures: Clinical practices and attitudes to diagnostic criteria and management strategies. Results: Overall, 62.8% (113/180) of clinicians completed the survey; of which, 66.4% (75/113) of the respondents reported that they would use an estimated fetal weight (EFW) of <10th centile for the smaller twin and an inter-twin EFW discordance of >25% for the diagnosis of sFGR. For early-onset type I sFGR, 79.8% (75/94) of respondents expressed that expectant management would be their routine practice. On the other hand, for early-onset type II and type III sFGR, 19.3% (17/88) and 35.7% (30/84) of respondents would manage these pregnancies expectantly, whereas 71.6% (63/88) and 57.1% (48/84) would refer these pregnancies to a fetal intervention centre or would offer fetal intervention for type II and type III cases, respectively. Moreover, 39.0% (16/41) of the respondents would consider fetoscopic laser surgery (FLS) for early-onset type I sFGR, whereas 41.5% (17/41) would offer either FLS or selective feticide, and 12.2% (5/41) would exclusively offer selective feticide. For early-onset type II and type III sFGR cases, 25.9% (21/81) and 31.4% (22/70) would exclusively offer FLS, respectively, whereas 33.3% (27/81) and 32.9% (23/70) would exclusively offer selective feticide. Conclusions: There is significant variation in clinician practices and attitudes towards the management of early-onset sFGR in MCDA twin pregnancies, especially for type II and type III cases, highlighting the need for high-level evidence to guide management.
Fetal Growth Restriction: Does an Integrated Maternal Hemodynamic-Placental Model Fit Better?

F. Mecacci,L. Avagliano,F. Lisi,S. Clemenza,Caterina Serena,S. Vannuccini,M. P. Rambaldi,S. Simeone,S. Ottanelli,F. Petraglia

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s43032-020-00393-2

2020-11-19

Reproductive Sciences

Abstract:Abstract In recent years, a growing interest has arisen regarding the possible relationship between adverse pregnancy outcomes (APOs) and inadequate maternal hemodynamic adaptations to the pregnancy. A possible association between “placental syndromes,” such as preeclampsia (PE) and fetal growth restriction (FGR), and subsequent maternal cardiovascular diseases (CVD) later in life has been reported. The two subtypes of FGR show different pathogenetic and clinical features. Defective placentation, due to a poor trophoblastic invasion of the maternal spiral arteries, is believed to play a central role in the pathogenesis of early-onset PE and FGR. Since placental functioning is dependent on the maternal cardiovascular system, a pre-existent or subsequent cardiovascular impairment may play a key role in the pathogenesis of early-onset FGR. Late FGR does not seem to be determined by a primary abnormal placentation in the first trimester. The pathological pathway of late-onset FGR may be due to a primary maternal cardiovascular maladaptation: CV system shows a flat profile and remains similar to those of non-pregnant women. Since the second trimester, when the placenta is already developed and increases its functional request, a hypovolemic state could lead to placental hypoperfusion and to an altered maturation of the placental villous tree and therefore to an altered fetal growth. Thus, this review focalizes on the possible relationship between maternal cardiac function and placentation in the development of both early and late-onset FGR. A better understanding of maternal hemodynamics in pregnancies complicated by FGR could bring various benefits in clinical practice, improving screening and therapeutic tools.

obstetrics & gynecology,reproductive biology
Do differences in diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction matter?

Bronacha MYLREA-FOLEY,Raffaele NAPOLITANO,Sanne GORDIJN,WOLF Hans,Christoph C LEES,Tamara STAMPALIJA,TRUFFLE-2 Feasibility Study Authors.,Hans WOLF

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2023.101117

IF: 8.679

2023-08-01

American Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology MFM

Abstract:BACKGROUND: Criteria for diagnosis of fetal growth restriction (FGR) differ widely according to national and international guidelines and further heterogeneity arises from the use of different biometric and Doppler reference charts, making the diagnosis of FGR highly variable.OBJECTIVE(S): To compare FGR definitions by Delphi consensus criteria and Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM) definition, using different standards/charts for fetal biometry and different reference ranges for Doppler velocimetry parameters.STUDY DESIGN: From the TRUFFLE 2 feasibility study (856 women with singleton pregnancy 32<sup>+0</sup> to 36<sup>+6</sup> weeks of gestation at risk of FGR) we selected 564 women with available mid-pregnancy biometry. For the comparison we used standards/charts for estimated fetal weight (EFW) and abdominal circumference (AC) from Hadlock, Intergrowth, GROW and Chitty. Percentiles for umbilical artery pulsatility index (PI) and its ratios with middle cerebral artery PI were calculated using Arduini and Ebbing reference charts. Sensitivity and specificity for low birthweight and adverse perinatal outcome were evaluated.RESULTS: Different combinations of definitions and reference charts identified substantially different proportions of fetuses within our population as FGR varying from 38% (with Delphi consensus definition, Intergrowth biometric standards and Arduini Doppler reference ranges) to 93% (with SMFM definition and Hadlock biometric standards). None of the different combinations tested appeared effective, with relative risk for birthweight below the 10<sup>th</sup> percentile between 1.4 to 2.1. Birthweight below the 10<sup>th</sup> percentile was observed most frequently when selection was made with the GROW/Chitty charts, slightly less using the Hadlock standard, and lowest with the Intergrowth standard. Using the Ebbing Doppler reference ranges resulted in a far higher proportion identified as FGR than with the Arduini Doppler reference ranges, while Delphi consensus definition with Ebbing Doppler reference ranges gave similar results to the SMFM definition. Delphi consensus definition using Arduini Doppler reference ranges were significantly associated with adverse perinatal outcome, with any biometric standards/charts. SMFM definition could not accurately detect adverse perinatal outcome irrespective of EFW standard/chart used.CONCLUSION(S): Different combinations of FGR definitions, biometry standards/charts and Doppler reference ranges select different proportions of fetuses categorized as FGR. The difference in adverse perinatal outcome may be modest, however these differences will have a significant impact in terms of rate of intervention.

English Else
Placental characteristics in different types of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twins

Xueju Wang,Luyao Li,Pengbo Yuan,Yangyu Zhao,Yuan Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/aogs.14204

Abstract:Introduction: This study aimed to explore the differences in placental characteristics among three types of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies. Material and methods: A total of 123 placentas with sFGR between April 2013 and October 2019 were retrospectively analyzed after dye injection. Placental characteristics were compared among the three types. Results: The gestational age at diagnosis and delivery was less in sFGR II and III than in sFGR I (22.9 [21.7-33.6], 23.3 [20.0-26.1] and 25.7 [19.0-35.0] weeks, p < 0.001; 32.3 [31.6-35.1], 34.1 [29.9-34.7] and 35.5 [34.0-37.0] weeks, p < 0.001). The birthweight discordance ratio was less in sFGR I than in sFGR II (0.28 [0.14-0.43] and 0.30 [0.23-0.37], p < 0.001). The prevalence of a thick artery-artery anastomosis was higher in sFGR III than in sFGR I or II (81.8%, 44.9% and 48.6%, p = 0.010). The placental territory discordance ratio was higher in sFGR II and III than in sFGR I (0.60 [0.17-0.88], 0.60 [0.01-0.80] and 0.50 [0.01-0.71], p = 0.001). Conclusions: Compared with sFGR I, the earlier onset time of sFGR II and III might be due to their higher placental territory discordance. The prevalence of thick artery-artery anastomoses was expected to be higher in sFGR III than in sFGR I or II.
Determination of blood lead levels.

A. Cantrell,D. Rees

Abstract:
Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction

C. Monaghan,E. Kalafat,J. Binder,B. Thilaganathan,A. Khalil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.19078

2019-02-01

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To identify key factors associated with adverse perinatal outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR).METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies diagnosed with sFGR at ≥ 16 weeks' gestation, in a single tertiary referral center between March 2000 and May 2015. The presence of coexisting twin-twin transfusion syndrome (TTTS) was noted. Fetal biometry and Doppler indices, including those of the umbilical artery (UA) and ductus venosus (DV), were recorded at the time of diagnosis. The type of sFGR was diagnosed according to the pattern of end-diastolic flow in the UA of the smaller twin. DV pulsatility indices for veins (DV-PIV) were converted to Z-scores and estimated fetal weight values to centiles, to correct for gestational age (GA). Cox proportional hazards model was used to examine for independent predictors of adverse perinatal outcome, which was defined according to survival and included both intrauterine fetal demise and neonatal death of the FGR twin.RESULTS: We analyzed 104 pregnancies, of which 66 (63.5%) were diagnosed with Type-I and 38 (36.5%) with Type-II sFGR at initial presentation. In pregnancies complicated by Type-II sFGR, the diagnosis of sFGR was made earlier than in those complicated by Type-I sFGR (mediam GA, 19.6 vs 21.5 weeks; P = 0.012), and Type-II sFGR was associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome (intrauterine demise of the smaller twin, 34.2% vs 10.6%; P = 0.004). Twin pregnancies complicated by sFGR resulting in perinatal demise had a significantly earlier diagnosis (P = 0.002) and lower birth-weight centile of the smaller twin (P < 0.01), those with Type-I sFGR had earlier GA at delivery (P = 0.007) and those with Type-II sFGR had higher DV-PIV Z-score of the smaller twin (P = 0.003), when compared with pregnancies resulting in live birth. Coexisting TTTS had no significant impact on the perinatal outcome of pregnancies diagnosed with either Type-I or Type-II sFGR (P > 0.05 for both). Earlier GA at diagnosis (hazard ratio (HR), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56-0.88); P = 0.002), Type-II sFGR (HR, 3.53 (95% CI, 1.37-9.07); P = 0.008) and higher DV-PIV Z-score (HR, 1.36 (95% CI, 1.12-1.65); P = 0.001) were significantly associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome of the smaller twin.CONCLUSIONS: Pregnancies complicated by Type-II sFGR are diagnosed significantly earlier and are associated with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome compared with those with Type-I sFGR. Coexisting TTTS has no significant impact on the perinatal outcome of pregnancies diagnosed with either Type-I or Type-II sFGR. Earlier GA at diagnosis, Type-II sFGR and higher DV-PIV Z-score are associated significantly with increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome of the smaller twin. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction according to management: systematic review and meta‐analysis

R. Townsend,F. D'Antonio,F. G. Sileo,H. Kumbay,B. Thilaganathan,A. Khalil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.20114

2019-01-01

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:OBJECTIVE: To explore the impact of severity and management (expectant, laser treatment or selective reduction) on perinatal outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR).METHODS: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, ClinicalTrials.gov and The Cochrane Library databases were searched for studies on outcome following expectant management, laser treatment or selective reduction in monochorionic twin pregnancies complicated by sFGR. Only pregnancies affected by sFGR and categorized according to the Gratacós classification (Type I, II or III) were included. The primary outcome was mortality, including single and double intrauterine (IUD), neonatal (NND) and perinatal deaths. Secondary outcomes were neonatal morbidity, abnormal postnatal brain imaging, intraventricular hemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, respiratory distress syndrome, admission to neonatal intensive care unit and survival free from neurological complications (intact survival). Meta-analyses of proportions were used to analyze the extracted data according to management, severity of sFGR and fetal size (smaller vs larger twin).RESULTS: Sixteen observational studies (786 monochorionic twin pregnancies) were included. In pregnancies complicated by Type-I sFGR managed expectantly, IUD occurred in 3.1% (95% CI, 1.1-5.9%) of fetuses and 97.9% (95% CI, 93.6-99.9%) of twins had intact survival. In pregnancies complicated by Type-I sFGR treated using laser therapy, IUD occurred in 16.7% (95% CI, 0.4-64.1%) of fetuses and, in those treated using selective reduction, IUD occurred in 0% (95% CI, 0-34.9%) of cotwins, with no evidence of neurological complications in the survivors. In pregnancies complicated by Type-II sFGR managed expectantly, IUD occurred in 16.6% (95% CI, 6.9-29.5%) and NND in 6.4% (95% CI, 0.2-28.2%) of fetuses, and 89.3% (95% CI, 71.8-97.7%) of twins survived without neurological compromise. In Type-II sFGR pregnancies treated using laser therapy, IUD occurred in 44.3% (95% CI, 22.2-67.7%) of fetuses, while none of the affected cases experienced morbidity and survivors were free of neurological complications. Of pregnancies undergoing selective reduction, IUD of the cotwin occurred in 5.0% (95% CI, 0.03-20.5%) and NND in 3.7% (95% CI, 0.2-11.1%), and 90.6% (95% CI, 42.3-94.3%) of surviving cotwins were free from neurological complications. In pregnancies complicated by Type-III sFGR managed expectantly, IUD occurred in 13.2% (95% CI, 7.2-20.5%) and NND in 6.8% (95% CI, 0.7-18.6%) of fetuses, and 61.9% (95% CI, 38.4-81.9%) of twins had intact survival. In pregnancies complicated by Type-III sFGR treated with laser therapy, IUD occurred in 32.9% (95% CI, 20.9-46.2%) of fetuses and all surviving twins were without neurological complications. Finally, in pregnancies with Type-III sFGR treated with selective reduction, NND occurred in 5.2% (95% CI, 0.8-12.8%) of cotwins and 98.8% (95% CI, 93.9-99.9%) had intact survival.CONCLUSION: Type-I sFGR is characterized by good perinatal outcome when managed expectantly, which represents the most reasonable management strategy for the large majority of affected cases. Pregnancies complicated by Type-II or -III sFGR treated with fetoscopic laser ablation have a higher rate of mortality but lower rate of morbidity compared with those managed expectantly, supporting the use of fetal therapy at gestations remote from neonatal viability. Data on outcome following selective reduction are scarce. In view of the lack of evidence from randomized controlled trials, prenatal management of sFGR should be individualized according to gestational age at diagnosis, severity of growth discordance and magnitude of Doppler anomalies. Copyright © 2018 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
The Delphi definition for selective fetal growth restriction may not improve detection of pathologic growth discordance in monochorionic twins

Clifton O Brock,Eric P Bergh,Anthony Johnson,Rodrigo Ruano,Edgar Hernandez-Andrade,Ramesha Papanna

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100561

Abstract:Background: A consensus definition of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twins was recently proposed following a Delphi procedure involving an international panel of experts. The new definition augments the traditional definition with additional sonographic criteria. Objective: We sought to determine whether the augmentations of the "Delphi definition" identified additional morbidity and mortality compared with a traditional definition. Furthermore, we sought to determine the benefit of each definition in identifying pathologic growth restriction relative to uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins. Study design: This was a retrospective analysis of unselected monochorionic diamniotic twins that underwent fortnightly ultrasound surveillance at a single center between 2011 and 2020. Patients with concomitant twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, twin anemia polycythemia sequence, or twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence at the time of diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction were excluded. The diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction using the Delphi definition required either an estimated fetal weight of <3rd percentile or presence of 2 of 4 observations in the smaller twin: (1) estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile, (2) estimated fetal weight discordance of >25% compared with the larger twin, (3) abdominal circumference of <10th percentile, (4) umbilical artery pulsatility index of >95th percentile. Diagnosis using the traditional definition required an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile and an estimated fetal weight discordance of >25%. To determine the efficacy of the augmentations in the Delphi definition, 3 groups were compared: group I, uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins; group II, twins with selective fetal growth restriction using the traditional definition (and therefore the Delphi definition); and group III, twins with selective fetal growth restriction solely using the Delphi definition. Demographic characteristics, subsequent development of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome or twin anemia polycythemia sequence, pregnancy outcomes, and neonatal outcomes were compared. Results: There were 325 patients with monochorionic diamniotic twins that met inclusion criteria. Of these, 213 (66%; group I) were uncomplicated, 37 (11%; group II) met the traditional definition for selective fetal growth restriction, and 112 (35%) met the Delphi definition for selective fetal growth restriction with 75 (67%) meeting solely the Delphi definition (group III). Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in group II delivered earlier than uncomplicated twins (32.1 vs 35.7 weeks of gestation; P<.01) and patients in group III (32.1 vs 35.6 weeks of gestation; P<.01). Furthermore, they were more likely to have critical umbilical artery Doppler abnormalities (38% vs 4%; P<.01) and be delivered for deteriorating fetal status (30% vs 5%; P<.01) than those in group III. Overall, survival was lower in group II than groups I and III (89% vs 96% and 100%, respectively; P=.04). Moreover, composite neonatal morbidity and mortality were greater in group II (30%) than either group I (6%; P<.01) or group III (9%; P<.01). The rates of composite neonatal morbidity and mortality were similar between groups I and III (P=.28). Conclusion: The addition of abdominal circumference and umbilical artery pulsatility index thresholds and isolated estimated fetal weight of <3%, as proposed by the Delphi definition, increased the diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction; however, there was no added benefit in the identification of growth discordant pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes. Prospective analysis of monochorionic diamniotic twins is required to contextualize these findings.
The changing Doppler patterns and perinatal outcomes of monochorionic diamniotic twins with selective fetal growth restriction

Luyao Li,Xueju Wang,Pengbo Yuan,Yangyu Zhao,Yuan Wei

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/jpm-2023-0350

2024-02-28

Journal of Perinatal Medicine

Abstract:To investigate the clinical outcomes and Doppler patterns changes in monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twins with selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR). We retrospectively analyzed 362 sFGR cases from January 2010 to May 2016 at a single tertiary referral center. The Doppler waveforms of umbilical artery end-diastolic flow were collected, and all neonates were subjected to an early neonatal brain scan. A total of 66/100 (66 %) type I cases were stable, whereas 25/100 (25 %) cases changed to type II and 9/100 (9 %) changed to sFGR complicated TTTS. A total of 48.9 % (22/45) sFGR cases were complicated with polyhydramnios and 30.4 % (7/23) sFGR cases were complicated with oligohydramnios, both of which were progressed to sFGR with TTTS. Mild cerebral injury was significantly associated with Doppler flow abnormalities, earlier gestational age at delivery and type of sFGR diagnosis. Severe cerebral injury was significantly associated with gestational age at delivery (31.6 vs. 34.1, p=0.002) and larger birthweight discordance (43.9 vs. 29.3 %, p=0.011). Doppler patterns in sFGR can gradually change, with important consequences with regard to management and outcomes. Along with abnormal Doppler findings, earlier occurrence of sFGR and delivery are associated with subsequent neonatal cerebral injury.

pediatrics,obstetrics & gynecology
Comparison of three different international fetal growth restriction definitions in Chinese population

Huijing Zhang,Yuqing Guo,Meixia Shang,Wei Wei Zhang,Feng Cheng,Hongyan Zhao,Youshun Sun,Huixia Yang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.22541/au.168674428.80118635/v1

2023-01-01

Abstract:Background Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is defined differently by the American College of Obstetrics and Gynecology (ACOG), Society for Maternal-Fetal Medicine (SMFM), and the International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology (ISUOG). Objective The purpose of this study was to investigate the predictive effect of three different diagnostic criteria of FGR on small-for-gestational-age (SGA) and adverse neonatal outcome (ANO), so as to find a better FGR-definition for Chinese population. Study Design The clinical data of singleton pregnancy who received regular pregnancy care and gave birth at the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology of Peking University First Hospital from January 1, 2021, to June 30, 2021 were collected. FGR cases were determined according to three different diagnostic criteria by ACOG, SMFM, or ISUOG. The primary outcome was the prediction of SGA and a composite ANO. SGA was defined as neonatal birth weight less than 10 percentile. An ANO included one of these adverse outcomes: neonatal umbilical arterial blood pH < 7.1, 5-minute Apgar score<7, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), intraventricular hemorrhage, and neonatal convulsion, and transfer to the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU). The specificity, sensitivity, negative predictive value (NPV) and positive predictive value (PPV) of the different diagnostic criteria for SGA and ANO were compared. The discriminatory capacities of the three FGR-definitions were compared using the area under receiver-operating-characteristics curves (AUC). Results A total of 2340 cases were included in this study, and 115 (4.9%), 63 (2.7%), and 48 (2.1%) cases of FGR were diagnosed using the diagnostic criteria issued by the SMFM, ACOG, and ISUOG respectively. There were 147 (6.28%) cases of SGA neonates. The SMFM criteria had higher sensitivity (40.82% vs 24.49%, 20.41%) for SGA compared to the ACOG and ISUOG criteria. On the contrary, the ISUOG criteria had a higher specificity (99.18% vs 97.49%, 98.77%) than the SMFM and ACOG criteria for predicting SGA. A total of 127 (5.43%) cases were complicated with ANO. All three definitions had low sensitivity for ANO (17.32%, 12.6%, 11.81%) and high specificity of 95.8%, 97.88% and 98.51%. The AUCs of SMFM for predicting SGA (0.692) and ANO (0.566) were slightly higher than those of ACOG (0.616, 0.552) and ISUOG (0.598, 0.552). Conclusion The predictive value of the SMFM and ISUOG definition for SGA and ANO was better than that of the ACOG criteria. In Chinese population, the discriminatory capacities of SMFM FGR definition were superior compared to the other two definitions.
Maternal Utero-Placental Perfusion Discordance in Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies with Selective Growth Restriction Assessed by Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Ultrasound

Lan Zhang,Xiyao Liu,Junnan Li,Xing Wang,Shuai Huang,Xiaofang Luo,Hua Zhang,Li Wen,Chao Tong,Richard Saffery,Jianying Yan,Hongbo Qi,Mark D. Kilby,Philip N. Baker

DOI: https://doi.org/10.12659/msm.919247

2020-01-01

Medical Science Monitor

Abstract:Background: The aim of this study was to assess the correlation between selective growth restriction (sGR) and co-twin utero-placental perfusion discordance by using three-dimensional power Doppler (3DPD). Material/Methods: We prospectively recruited 60 sGR and 64 normal monochorionic-diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies. Vascularization index (VI), flow index (FI), and vascularization flow index (VFI) were assessed by 3DPD, while umbilical artery pulsatility index (UA-PI), middle cerebral artery peak systolic velocity (MCA-PSV), pulsatility index (MCA-PI), and cerebroplacental ratio (CPR) were assessed by conventional Doppler imaging. Results: In sGR co-twins, the VI, FI, VFI, MCA-PI, and CPR were significantly lower, while the UA-PI and MCA-PSV were significantly greater, in the smaller fetuses compared with the larger fetuses; significant differences were also observed in the VI, FI, VFI, CPR, and UA-PI in normal co-twins. Compared with the appropriately grown twins, the discordances of the VI, FI, VFI, UA-PI, MCA-PI, and CPR were increased in the sGR cohort. The discordances of the VI, FI, VFI, UA-PI, MCA-PI, and CPR were associated with birthweight discordance, and the FI discordance and CPR discordance were independently associated with sGR. The combination of the FI and CPR discordance showed a higher predictive accuracy for sGR, with an area under the ROC curve of 0.813, and a sensitivity and specificity of 68.33% and 85.94%, respectively. Conclusions: MCDA twin pregnancies with birthweight discordance presented utero-placental perfusion deterioration assessed by 3DPD prior to sGR diagnosis. Co-twin utero-placental perfusion discordance was significantly correlated with growth discordance, and this correlation was more predictive of sGR when 3DPD was combined with conventional Doppler imaging.
Early-onset fetal growth restriction: comparison of two management protocols in a single tertiary center

Ana Dagge,Joana Barros,André Graça,Rui Marques Carvalho

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14767058.2023.2183755

2023-03-03

Abstract:Compare the neonatal outcomes of two protocols of diagnosis and surveillance of pregnancies complicated by early-onset FGR in a tertiary hospital. This is a retrospective cohort study of pregnant women diagnosed with early-onset FGR between 2017 and 2020. We compared the obstetric and perinatal outcomes between two different management protocols (before and after 2019). Seventy-two cases of early-onset FGR were diagnosed in the forementioned period: 45 (62.5%) were managed according to protocol 1 and 27 (37.5%) according to protocol 2. Mean gestational age at delivery was significantly different between groups: 34.9 ± 3.1 weeks (95% CI 34.0–35.9) in group 1 and 32.3 ± 4.4 weeks (95% CI 30.4–33.9) in group 2. 74.1% (20) of newborns in group 2 were admitted in de NICU, a significant difference when compared with 46.7% of group 1. There were no statistically significant differences in the remaining serious neonatal adverse outcomes. This is the first study published comparing two different protocols of management of FGR. The implementation of the new protocol seems to have led to a decrease in the number of fetuses labeled as growth restricted and to a decrease in the gestational age of delivery of such fetuses, but without increasing the rate of serious neonatal adverse outcomes. The implementation of the 2016 ISUOG guidelines for the diagnosis of fetal growth restriction seems to have led to a decrease in the number of fetuses labeled as growth restricted and to a decrease in the gestational age of delivery of such fetuses, but without increasing the rate of serious neonatal adverse outcomes.

obstetrics & gynecology
The accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction with second trimester Doppler ultrasound in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies

Yao Wang,Ai Zhang,Tineck Stock,Enrico Lopriore,Dick Oepkes,Qiuzhen Wang

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0255897

IF: 3.7

2021-08-09

PLoS ONE

Abstract:Background Selective fetal restriction growth (sFGR) is one of the common diseases of monochorionic diamniotic (MCDA) twin pregnancies, resulting in many adverse outcomes. At present, second trimester ultrasonography is widely used in the prenatal diagnosis of sFGR, but the diagnostic effectiveness is still uncertain. The aim of this study is to assess the diagnostic accuracy of second trimester Doppler ultrasound measurements for sFGR. Methods A retrospective study included 280 pregnant women (118 with and 162 without sFGR) with MCDA pregnancies was conducted in the fetal medicine center from Leiden University Medical Center from January 2008 to December 2013. The women participating had already undergone an ultrasound examination in the second trimester. The postnatal criteria of sFGR was a single birth weight (BW) < 3 rd percentile in a twin, or birth weight discordance (BWD)≥25% between two twins, while the BW of the smaller twin < 10th percentile. Early prenatal diagnosis of sFGR was defined as a single EFW < 3 rd percentile in a twin, or at least 2 of the following 4 parameters must be met (fetal weight of one fetus < 10th percentile, AC of one fetus 95th percentile). According to the diagnosis of sFGR after birth, we evaluate diagnostic effectiveness of Doppler ultrasound in the second trimester for sFGR. Results Of these 280 participants, the mean age was 32.06 ± 4.76 years. About 43.9% of pregnant women were primiparas. The ability of second trimester Doppler ultrasound to accurately diagnosed sFGR is 75.4%, missed diagnosis rate and the misdiagnosis rate were 24.6% and 10.5% respectively. The ROC curve indicated that the combination of AC discordance, EFW discordance, and small fetal UA blood flow was the best diagnostic indicator of sFGR in MCDA pregnancy with the AUC was 0.882 (95%CI, 0.839–0.926). Conclusions Second trimester Doppler and ultrasound measurements is an effective method for early prenatal diagnosis of sFGR. The combined indicator of AC discordance, EFW discordance, and the small fetal UA blood flow reaches highest diagnostic value.

multidisciplinary sciences
A Summary of Chinese Expert Consensus on Fetal Growth Restriction (an Update on the 2019 Version)

Luming Sun,Yali Hu,Hongbo Qi

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1097/fm9.0000000000000158

2022-01-01

Maternal-Fetal Medicine

Abstract:Fetal growth restriction (FGR) is a common complication of pregnancy associated with higher rates of perinatal mortality and morbidity, as well as a variety of long-term adverse outcomes. To standardize the clinical practice for the management of FGR in China, Fetal Medicine Subgroup, Chinese Society of Perinatal Medicine, Chinese Medical Association and Maternal-Fetal Medicine Committee, Chinese Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology,Chinese Medical Association organized an expert committee to provide official consensus-based recommendations on FGR. We evaluated the evidence provided by relevant high-quality literature, performed a three-round Delphi study and organized face-to-face meetings with experts from multidisciplinary backgrounds. The consensus includes the definition, prenatal screening, prevention, diagnosis, monitoring and management of FGR.
Outcome of twin fetuses with selective fetal growth restriction

邢燕,周颖

DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn113903-20210123-00075

2021-01-01

Abstract:Selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) occurs in about 10% to 15% of monochorionic twins with a high incidence of intrauterine fetal death and low gestational age at birth. sFGR is associated with multisystem adverse prognosis, including brain injury, myocardial hypertrophy, right ventricular outflow tract obstruction, intestinal perforation, and abnormal insulin secretion. sFGR can be classified into three types based on the umbilical artery Doppler waveforms under ultrasound. The clinical characteristics and prognosis vary with the different types. There are few reported studies on the sFGR population, and comprehensive, long-term follow-up is needed.
OP16.04: Perinatal outcomes of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies diagnosed with different criteria: ISUOG versus Delphi criteria

O. Yaghi,S. Sorrenti,F. Fathima,S. Prasad,D. Mohammed,A. Khalil

DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.28004

2024-09-11

Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology

Abstract:Ultrasound in Obstetrics &Gynecology, Volume 64, Issue S1, Page 102-103, September 2024.

radiology, nuclear medicine & medical imaging,obstetrics & gynecology,acoustics
Fetal growth restriction: current diagnostic criteria, management of pregnancy and labor

M.A. Kurtser,L.G. Sichinava,D.I. Shishkina,O.A. Latyshkevich,L.E. Breusenko,D.S. Spiridonov,,,,,,

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20953/1726-1678-2023-1-5-11

2023-01-01

Abstract:Objective. To prove the advantages of new diagnostic criteria for fetal growth restriction (FGR) with centile assessment of fetal biometric parameters and Doppler parameters of blood flow in the maternal-placental-fetal system. Patients and methods. A retrospective analysis was made of 364 obstetric histories and perinatal outcomes in patients diagnosed with FGR during pregnancy according to the “former” classification. Simultaneously, fetal growth was assessed using the new classification (2022); a comparative analysis of the diagnostic significance of FGR criteria in both classifications was performed. The prospective phase involved 90 patients in whom the diagnosis of FGR was based on the centile assessment of fetal biometric parameters and Doppler parameters. The examination included Doppler ultrasound and computerized cardiotocography. The histological examination of the placenta was carried out in 23 cases of FGR. Results. The use of new diagnostic criteria for FGR based on the centile assessment of fetal biometric parameters and Doppler parameters significantly reduced the rate of false-positive diagnoses of FGR from 40% to 15%. The histological examination of 21 (82%) out of 23 placentas revealed chronic placental insufficiency with equal frequency in the early (32%) and late (37%) phenotype of FGR. Conclusion. Thus, the use of new diagnostic criteria for FGR can improve the fetal growth assessment and optimize pregnancy and labor management tactics, accompanied by a decrease in the rate of unjustified preterm labor, cesarean sections, and improved perinatal outcomes. Key words: fetal growth restriction, classification of fetal growth restriction, small for gestational age

Stanley Krippner, PhD. Medicine and the inner realities. Interview by Bonnie Horrigan.

Hereditary and environmental factors influencing on the serum uric acid throughout ten years population study in Japan.

Selective Fetal Growth Restriction Type III: Application of a Recent Expert Consensus Definition

Outcome‐based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction

Diagnosis and management of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies: A cross-sectional international survey

Fetal Growth Restriction: Does an Integrated Maternal Hemodynamic-Placental Model Fit Better?

Do differences in diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction matter?

Placental characteristics in different types of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twins

Determination of blood lead levels.

Prediction of adverse pregnancy outcome in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction

Perinatal outcome of monochorionic twin pregnancy complicated by selective fetal growth restriction according to management: systematic review and meta‐analysis

The Delphi definition for selective fetal growth restriction may not improve detection of pathologic growth discordance in monochorionic twins

The changing Doppler patterns and perinatal outcomes of monochorionic diamniotic twins with selective fetal growth restriction

Comparison of three different international fetal growth restriction definitions in Chinese population

Maternal Utero-Placental Perfusion Discordance in Monochorionic-Diamniotic Twin Pregnancies with Selective Growth Restriction Assessed by Three-Dimensional Power Doppler Ultrasound

Early-onset fetal growth restriction: comparison of two management protocols in a single tertiary center

The accuracy of prenatal diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction with second trimester Doppler ultrasound in monochorionic diamniotic twin pregnancies

A Summary of Chinese Expert Consensus on Fetal Growth Restriction (an Update on the 2019 Version)

Outcome of twin fetuses with selective fetal growth restriction

OP16.04: Perinatal outcomes of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies diagnosed with different criteria: ISUOG versus Delphi criteria

Fetal growth restriction: current diagnostic criteria, management of pregnancy and labor