Abstract:Background: A consensus definition of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic diamniotic twins was recently proposed following a Delphi procedure involving an international panel of experts. The new definition augments the traditional definition with additional sonographic criteria. Objective: We sought to determine whether the augmentations of the "Delphi definition" identified additional morbidity and mortality compared with a traditional definition. Furthermore, we sought to determine the benefit of each definition in identifying pathologic growth restriction relative to uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins. Study design: This was a retrospective analysis of unselected monochorionic diamniotic twins that underwent fortnightly ultrasound surveillance at a single center between 2011 and 2020. Patients with concomitant twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome, twin anemia polycythemia sequence, or twin reversed arterial perfusion sequence at the time of diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction were excluded. The diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction using the Delphi definition required either an estimated fetal weight of <3rd percentile or presence of 2 of 4 observations in the smaller twin: (1) estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile, (2) estimated fetal weight discordance of >25% compared with the larger twin, (3) abdominal circumference of <10th percentile, (4) umbilical artery pulsatility index of >95th percentile. Diagnosis using the traditional definition required an estimated fetal weight of <10th percentile and an estimated fetal weight discordance of >25%. To determine the efficacy of the augmentations in the Delphi definition, 3 groups were compared: group I, uncomplicated monochorionic diamniotic twins; group II, twins with selective fetal growth restriction using the traditional definition (and therefore the Delphi definition); and group III, twins with selective fetal growth restriction solely using the Delphi definition. Demographic characteristics, subsequent development of twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome or twin anemia polycythemia sequence, pregnancy outcomes, and neonatal outcomes were compared. Results: There were 325 patients with monochorionic diamniotic twins that met inclusion criteria. Of these, 213 (66%; group I) were uncomplicated, 37 (11%; group II) met the traditional definition for selective fetal growth restriction, and 112 (35%) met the Delphi definition for selective fetal growth restriction with 75 (67%) meeting solely the Delphi definition (group III). Demographic characteristics were similar between groups. Patients in group II delivered earlier than uncomplicated twins (32.1 vs 35.7 weeks of gestation; P<.01) and patients in group III (32.1 vs 35.6 weeks of gestation; P<.01). Furthermore, they were more likely to have critical umbilical artery Doppler abnormalities (38% vs 4%; P<.01) and be delivered for deteriorating fetal status (30% vs 5%; P<.01) than those in group III. Overall, survival was lower in group II than groups I and III (89% vs 96% and 100%, respectively; P=.04). Moreover, composite neonatal morbidity and mortality were greater in group II (30%) than either group I (6%; P<.01) or group III (9%; P<.01). The rates of composite neonatal morbidity and mortality were similar between groups I and III (P=.28). Conclusion: The addition of abdominal circumference and umbilical artery pulsatility index thresholds and isolated estimated fetal weight of <3%, as proposed by the Delphi definition, increased the diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction; however, there was no added benefit in the identification of growth discordant pregnancies at risk of adverse outcomes. Prospective analysis of monochorionic diamniotic twins is required to contextualize these findings.

Do differences in diagnostic criteria for late fetal growth restriction matter?

Fetal Growth Restriction: Does an Integrated Maternal Hemodynamic-Placental Model Fit Better?

Outcome‐based comparison of SMFM and ISUOG definitions of fetal growth restriction

Consensus definition and essential reporting parameters of selective fetal growth restriction in twin pregnancy: a Delphi procedure

Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure

Fetal Biometry and Doppler Study for the Assessment of Perinatal Outcome in Stage I Late-Onset Fetal Growth Restriction

Current practice in the diagnosis and management of fetal growth restriction: An international survey

Role of Doppler ultrasound at time of diagnosis of late‐onset fetal growth restriction in predicting adverse perinatal outcome: prospective cohort study

Comparison of three different international fetal growth restriction definitions in Chinese population

Obstetric and pediatric growth charts for the detection of fetal growth restriction and neonatal adverse outcomes in preterm newborns before 34 weeks of gestation

Evaluation of the new expert consensus-based definition of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies

Selective Fetal Growth Restriction Type III: Application of a Recent Expert Consensus Definition

Late-onset fetal growth restriction management: a national survey

Expanded Fetal Growth Restriction Definition Identifies High Proportion of Umbilical Artery Doppler Anomalies

The Delphi definition for selective fetal growth restriction may not improve detection of pathologic growth discordance in monochorionic twins

Customized versus Population Growth Standards for Morbidity and Mortality Risk Stratification Using Ultrasonographic Fetal Growth Assessment at 22 to 29 Weeks' Gestation

Neonatal Outcomes of Infants Diagnosed with Fetal Growth Restriction during Late Pregnancy versus after Birth

Early-onset fetal growth restriction: comparison of two management protocols in a single tertiary center

Fetal growth pathology score: a novel ultrasound parameter for individualized assessment of third trimester growth abnormalities

Diagnosis and management of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic twin pregnancies: A cross-sectional international survey

Can adverse neonatal outcome be predicted in late preterm or term fetal growth restriction?