Abstract:Bell’s inequality is derived by resorting to a hidden-variable theory devised for resolving the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. The legitimacy of quantum superposition for describing the physical world is the essence of the debate. Einstein argued against the legitimacy of quantum superposition. Testing Bell’s inequality by experiments with the experimental results explained by Bell’s theorem opened the door to so-called quantum information technologies. In quantum information theory, “quantum bit” (or “qubit” for short) in a form of quantum superposition is supposed to represent quantum information. In the present paper, a new principle, the general principle of measurements, is introduced and proved as a mathematical theorem. Based on this principle, the experiments for testing Bell’s inequality and so-called experimental evidence for physically realizable “qubit” are scrutinized. The findings are as follows. Although most physicists believe that Einstein’s vision of the physical world contradicts the experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality, actually Einstein’s viewpoint is irrelevant to Bell’s theorem. Bell’s inequality failed to capture the essence of the Einstein-Bohr debate. The experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality and the measurement outcomes of various experiments involving “qubit” are all erroneously explained. Without involving hidden variables, quantum mechanics can be completed based on the general principle of measurements by using disjunction (“or”) as the logical relation between the orthonormal vectors that span an arbitrarily given Hilbert space, and the mathematical setting can remain essentially unchanged. All kinds of “qubit” violate the general principle of measurements and can only describe imaginary objects that do not exist in the real world. A very regrettable conclusion from the above findings is inevitable: Quantum information has no physical carriers, and all quantum information technologies are not physically realizable.

Bell's inequality and a strict assessment of the concept of ``possession''

On Purported Physical Realizations of So-called Quantum Information Technologies

Non-local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality

Bell's theorem in time without inequalities

Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications

Tackling Loopholes in Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequality

Violations of Locality Beyond Bell's Theorem

Bell's inequalities III. Logical loophole in their formulation

Loophole-free Bell inequality violations cannot disprove local realism

After Bell

Bellʼs Inequality and Extremal Non-Local Box from Hardyʼs Test for Non-Locality

Quantum non-locality - It ain't necessarily so...

Bell's Inequality and Heisenberg Measurements on Relativistic Quantum Systems

Does a Bell inequality violation imply irrealism?

Bell's inequalities I: An explanation for their experimental violation

All Entangled Pure States Violate a Single Bell’s Inequality

Experimental Non-Violation of the Bell Inequality

Bell's nonlocality in a general nonsignaling case: quantitatively and conceptually

The Local Account of Bell Nonlocality

Bell Theorem Without Inequality for Some Generalized Ghz and W States

Bell's Theorem Begs the Question