Abstract:Bell inequalities were created with the goal of improving the understanding of foundational questions in quantum mechanics. To this end, they are typically applied to measurement results generated from entangled systems of particles. They can, however, also be used as a statistical tool for macroscopic systems, where they can describe the connection strength between two components of a system under a causal model. We show that, in principle, data from macroscopic observations analyzed with Bell’ s approach can invalidate certain causal models. To illustrate this use, we describe a macroscopic game setting, without a quantum mechanical measurement process, and analyze it using the framework of Bell experiments. In the macroscopic game, violations of the inequalities can be created by cheating with classically defined strategies. In the physical context, the meaning of violations is less clear and is still vigorously debated. We discuss two measures for optimal strategies to generate a given statistic that violates the inequalities. We show their mathematical equivalence and how they can be computed from CHSH-quantities alone, if non-signaling applies. As a macroscopic example from the financial world, we show how the unfair use of insider knowledge could be picked up using Bell statistics. Finally, in the discussion of realist interpretations of quantum mechanical Bell experiments, cheating strategies are often expressed through the ideas of free choice and locality. In this regard, violations of free choice and locality can be interpreted as two sides of the same coin, which underscores the view that the meaning these terms are given in Bell’s approach should not be confused with their everyday use. In general, we conclude that Bell’s approach also carries lessons for understanding macroscopic systems of which the connectedness conforms to different causal structures.

Bell's inequalities I: An explanation for their experimental violation

The Bell inequality, inviolable by data used consistently with its derivation, leads to quantum correlations that satisfy it, and probabilities that satisfy the Wigner inequality

Bell's inequalities III. Logical loophole in their formulation

Unseen facts due to the statistical derivation of the Bell inequality and their logical consequences

Bell's inequality violation due to misidentification of spatially non stationary random processes

The Bell inequality is satisfied by quantum correlations computed consistently with quantum non-commutation

Entropic Bell Inequalities

An alternative view: satisfaction of the four variable Belli inequality using quantum correlations

Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications

Bell’s theorem without inequalities

Some consequences of Sica's approach to Bell's inequalities

A simple proof of Bell's inequality

Bell's Inequality and Heisenberg Measurements on Relativistic Quantum Systems

Tackling Loopholes in Experimental Tests of Bell's Inequality

Non-local Hidden Variable Theories and Bell's Inequality

Bell's inequality and the spooky actions at a distance

Violation of Bell's Inequality in the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Form with Entangled Quantum States Revisited

Classifying 50 years of Bell inequalities

A Zoology of Bell inequalities resistant to detector inefficiency

Quantifying and Interpreting Connection Strength in Macro- and Microscopic Systems: Lessons from Bell’s Approach

Custom Bell inequalities from formal sums of squares