Abstract:Bell’s inequality is derived by resorting to a hidden-variable theory devised for resolving the Einstein-Bohr debate on the conceptual foundations of quantum mechanics. The legitimacy of quantum superposition for describing the physical world is the essence of the debate. Einstein argued against the legitimacy of quantum superposition. Testing Bell’s inequality by experiments with the experimental results explained by Bell’s theorem opened the door to so-called quantum information technologies. In quantum information theory, “quantum bit” (or “qubit” for short) in a form of quantum superposition is supposed to represent quantum information. In the present paper, a new principle, the general principle of measurements, is introduced and proved as a mathematical theorem. Based on this principle, the experiments for testing Bell’s inequality and so-called experimental evidence for physically realizable “qubit” are scrutinized. The findings are as follows. Although most physicists believe that Einstein’s vision of the physical world contradicts the experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality, actually Einstein’s viewpoint is irrelevant to Bell’s theorem. Bell’s inequality failed to capture the essence of the Einstein-Bohr debate. The experimental results of testing Bell’s inequality and the measurement outcomes of various experiments involving “qubit” are all erroneously explained. Without involving hidden variables, quantum mechanics can be completed based on the general principle of measurements by using disjunction (“or”) as the logical relation between the orthonormal vectors that span an arbitrarily given Hilbert space, and the mathematical setting can remain essentially unchanged. All kinds of “qubit” violate the general principle of measurements and can only describe imaginary objects that do not exist in the real world. A very regrettable conclusion from the above findings is inevitable: Quantum information has no physical carriers, and all quantum information technologies are not physically realizable.

Does a Bell inequality violation imply irrealism?

Violation of Bell Inequalities: Mapping the Conceptual Implications

Violations of Locality Beyond Bell's Theorem

Loophole-free Bell inequality violations cannot disprove local realism

Violation of Local Realism with Freedom of Choice.

An experimental test of non-local realism

Quantum non-locality - It ain't necessarily so...

On the conflict between local realism and classical physics

Bell inequality violation in relativity theory

On Purported Physical Realizations of So-called Quantum Information Technologies

Is a spectrograph of hidden variables possible?

Bell inequalities violation in relativity theory

After Bell

Experimental Non-Violation of the Bell Inequality

Bell's theorem tells us NOT what quantum mechanics IS, but what quantum mechanics IS NOT

Is realism compatible with true randomness ?

The Local Account of Bell Nonlocality

Explanation of the violation of Bell's inequality by maintaining Einstein separability

Violation of Bell's Inequality in the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt Form with Entangled Quantum States Revisited

Reinterpreting Quantum Probabilities in a Realistic and Local Framework: The Modified BCHSH Inequalities

Bell's nonlocality in a general nonsignaling case: quantitatively and conceptually