Handling Missing Data in Growth Mixture Models

Daniel Y. Lee,Jeffrey R. Harring
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986221149140
2023-02-09
Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics
Abstract:Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, Ahead of Print. A Monte Carlo simulation was performed to compare methods for handling missing data in growth mixture models. The methods considered in the current study were (a) a fully Bayesian approach using a Gibbs sampler, (b) full information maximum likelihood using the expectation–maximization algorithm, (c) multiple imputation, (d) a two-stage multiple imputation method, and (e) listwise deletion. Of the five methods, it was found that the Bayesian approach and two-stage multiple imputation methods generally produce less biased parameter estimates compared to maximum likelihood or single imputation methods, although key differences were observed. Similarities and disparities among methods are highlighted and general recommendations articulated.
education & educational research,psychology, mathematical,social sciences, mathematical methods
What problem does this paper attempt to address?