Abstract:In longitudinal studies, missing data are common. The missing not at random (MNAR) data may lead to biasd parameter estimates and even distort the results of analyses. In this article we compared two techniques based on different mechanisms [i.e., the maximum likelihood approach based on the Missing at Random (MAR) mechanism and the Diggle-Kenward selection model based on the MNAR mechanism] for handling different types of missing data using the Monte Carlo simulation method. Estimates of parameters and standard errors using each of these methods were contrasted under different model assumptions. Four possible influential factors were considered: the dropout missingness proportions, the sample size, the distribution shape (i.e., skewness and kurtosis), and the missing mechanisms. The results indicated that (1) The Diggle-Kenward selection model were affected less by the missingness mechanism than the ML approach. At the MAR condition, the Diggle-Kenward selection model based on the MNAR mechanism kept stable and would provide similar estimation results with the ML approach based on the MAR assumption. At the MNAR condition, the ML approach was not much different from the Diggle-Kenward selection model in their variance of latent variances (σi2 and σs2) but had greater discrepancy in their means of the latent variables (μi and μs). (2) The distribution shape had more impact on the Diggle-Kenward selection model. For the mean and variance of the intercept and the variance of the slope, the sample size and the degrees of skewness and kurtosis had significant interactions. With large sample sizes, the influence of distribution shape on the estimation precision would decrease. The ML approach was not easily affected by the distribution shape. (3) When fitting a growth curve model, compared to the means of the latent variables (μi and μs), the variances (σi2 and σs2) were influenced much more by the distribution shape (i.e., the degree of skewness and kurtosis). (4) The level of dropout missingness proportion was the major factor affecting the parameter estimation precision. Greater sample size would improve the estimation precision in most cases.

Mixed‐Effect Hybrid Models for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Dropout

Bayesian Latent-Class Mixed-Effect Hybrid Models for Dyadic Longitudinal Data with Non-Ignorable Dropouts.

Bayesian Modeling Longitudinal Dyadic Data with Nonignorable Dropout, with Application to a Breast Cancer Study

Model‐Assisted Regression Estimators for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Dropout

Comparison of Maximum Likelihood Approach, Diggle-Kenward Selection Model, Pattern Mixture Model with MAR and MNAR Dropout Data.

Mixtures of semiparametric varying coefficient models for longitudinal data with nonignorable dropout

Maximum likelihood estimation of hidden Markov models for continuous longitudinal data with missing responses and dropout

Bayesian Analysis of Nonlinear Reproductive Dispersion Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Missing Covariates

Improved Empirical Likelihood Inference and Variable Selection for Generalized Linear Models with Longitudinal Nonignorable Dropouts

A non-homogeneous hidden Markov model for partially observed longitudinal responses

Robust Statistical Inference for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Dropouts

Empirical Likelihood Inference in Mixture of Semiparametric Varying-Coefficient Models for Longitudinal Data with Non-Ignorable Dropout

Missing not at random models for latent growth curve analyses.

Maximum-Likelihood Estimation and Influence Analysis in Multivariate Skew-Normal Reproductive Dispersion Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data

Generalized Partial Linear Models with Nonignorable Dropouts

LGM-based Analyses with Missing Data:Comparison Between ML Method and Diggle-Kenward Selection Model

Growth modeling with nonignorable dropout: Alternative analyses of the STAR*D antidepressant trial.

Doubly robust estimation of partially linear models for longitudinal data with dropouts and measurement error in covariates

Modeling Heterogeneity and Missing Data of Multiple Longitudinal Outcomes in Electronic Health Records

Bayesian Analysis of Longitudinal Dyadic Data with Informative Missing Data Using a Dyadic Shared-Parameter Model

Bias in Longitudinal Data Analysis with Missing Data Using Typical Linear Mixed-Effects Modelling and Pattern-Mixture Approach: an Analytical Illustration