Abstract:In longitudinal studies, missing data are common. The missing not at random (MNAR) data may lead to biasd parameter estimates and even distort the results of analyses. In this article we compared two techniques based on different mechanisms [i.e., the maximum likelihood approach based on the Missing at Random (MAR) mechanism and the Diggle-Kenward selection model based on the MNAR mechanism] for handling different types of missing data using the Monte Carlo simulation method. Estimates of parameters and standard errors using each of these methods were contrasted under different model assumptions. Four possible influential factors were considered: the dropout missingness proportions, the sample size, the distribution shape (i.e., skewness and kurtosis), and the missing mechanisms. The results indicated that (1) The Diggle-Kenward selection model were affected less by the missingness mechanism than the ML approach. At the MAR condition, the Diggle-Kenward selection model based on the MNAR mechanism kept stable and would provide similar estimation results with the ML approach based on the MAR assumption. At the MNAR condition, the ML approach was not much different from the Diggle-Kenward selection model in their variance of latent variances (σi2 and σs2) but had greater discrepancy in their means of the latent variables (μi and μs). (2) The distribution shape had more impact on the Diggle-Kenward selection model. For the mean and variance of the intercept and the variance of the slope, the sample size and the degrees of skewness and kurtosis had significant interactions. With large sample sizes, the influence of distribution shape on the estimation precision would decrease. The ML approach was not easily affected by the distribution shape. (3) When fitting a growth curve model, compared to the means of the latent variables (μi and μs), the variances (σi2 and σs2) were influenced much more by the distribution shape (i.e., the degree of skewness and kurtosis). (4) The level of dropout missingness proportion was the major factor affecting the parameter estimation precision. Greater sample size would improve the estimation precision in most cases.

Bayesian Methods and Model Selection for Latent Growth Curve Models with Missing Data

Bayesian Approach to Non-ignorable Missingness in Latent Growth Models

Model Selection Criteria for Latent Growth Models Using Bayesian Methods

Bayesian Inference for Growth Mixture Models with Latent Class Dependent Missing Data

Bayesian Analysis Of Longitudinal Data Using Growth Curve Models

Missing not at random models for latent growth curve analyses.

Bayesian Latent-Class Mixed-Effect Hybrid Models for Dyadic Longitudinal Data with Non-Ignorable Dropouts.

Robust growth mixture models with non-ignorable missingness: Models, estimation, selection, and application

Bayesian Modeling Longitudinal Dyadic Data with Nonignorable Dropout, with Application to a Breast Cancer Study

Mixed‐Effect Hybrid Models for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Dropout

Latent Growth Curve Models

LGM-based Analyses with Missing Data:Comparison Between ML Method and Diggle-Kenward Selection Model

Modeling Error Distributions of Growth Curve Models Through Bayesian Methods.

Growth modeling with nonignorable dropout: Alternative analyses of the STAR*D antidepressant trial.

Bayesian Nonparametric Regression Analysis of Data with Random Effects Covariates from Longitudinal Measurements

Handling Missing Data in Growth Mixture Models

Selecting a linear mixed model for longitudinal data: Repeated measures analysis of variance, covariance pattern model, and growth curve approaches.

Bayesian Analysis of Nonlinear Reproductive Dispersion Mixed Models for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Missing Covariates

Bayesian estimation for longitudinal data in a joint model with HPCs

Evaluation of A Bayesian Approach to Estimating Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Mixture Models

Bayesian Analysis of Non-Linear Structural Equation Models with Non-Ignorable Missing Outcomes from Reproductive Dispersion Models.