Abstract:Structural Equation Models (SEMs) are routinely used in the analysis of empirical data by researchers from different scientific fields such as psychologists or economists. In some fields, such as in ecology, SEMs have only started recently to attract attention and thanks to dedicated software packages the use of SEMs has steadily increased. Yet, common analysis practices in such fields that might be transposed from other statistical techniques such as model acceptance or rejection based on p-value screening might be poorly fitted for SEMs especially when these models are used to confirm or reject hypotheses. In this simulation study, SEMs were fitted via two commonly used R packages: lavaan and piecewiseSEM. Five different data-generation scenarios were explored: (i) random, (ii) exact, (iii) shuffled, (iv) underspecified and (v) overspecified. In addition, sample size and model complexity were also varied to explore their impact on various global and local model fitness indices. The results showed that not one single model index should be used to decide on model fitness but rather a combination of different model fitness indices is needed. The global chi-square test for lavaan or the Fisher's C statistic for piecewiseSEM were, in isolation, poor indicators of model fitness. In addition, the simulations showed that to achieve sufficient power to detect individual effects, adequate sample sizes are required. Finally, BIC showed good capacity to select models closer to the truth especially for more complex models. I provide, based on these results, a flowchart indicating how information from different metrics may be combined to reveal model strength and weaknesses. Researchers in scientific fields with little experience in SEMs, such as in ecology, should consider and accept these limitations.

The Effect of Model Misspecification on Growth Mixture Model Class Enumeration

Impact of Misspecifications of the Latent Variance–Covariance and Residual Matrices on the Class Enumeration Accuracy of Growth Mixture Models

Determining the Number of Latent Classes in Single- and Multi-Phase Growth Mixture Models

Extracting Spurious Latent Classes in Growth Mixture Modeling With Nonnormal Errors

Investigating Approaches to Estimating Covariate Effects in Growth Mixture Modeling: A Simulation Study

Deciding on the Number of Classes in Latent Class Analysis and Growth Mixture Modeling: A Monte Carlo Simulation Study

Improving convergence in growth mixture models without covariance structure constraints

Model-based clustering and classification using mixtures of multivariate skewed power exponential distributions

Model Selection Criteria for Latent Growth Models Using Bayesian Methods

Fitting Structural Equation Model Trees and Latent Growth Curve Mixture Models in Longitudinal Designs: The Influence of Model Misspecification

Using mixture models with known class membership to address incomplete covariance structures in multiple-group growth models

A Comparison of Label Switching Algorithms in the Context of Growth Mixture Models

Evaluation of A Bayesian Approach to Estimating Nonlinear Mixed-Effects Mixture Models

Bayesian Inference for Growth Mixture Models with Latent Class Dependent Missing Data

Handling Missing Data in Growth Mixture Models

Mixed‐Effect Hybrid Models for Longitudinal Data with Nonignorable Dropout

Mixture class recovery in GMM under varying degrees of class separation: Frequentist versus Bayesian estimation.

Robust growth mixture models with non-ignorable missingness: Models, estimation, selection, and application

Two-step growth mixture model to examine heterogeneity in nonlinear trajectories

Bayesian Methods and Model Selection for Latent Growth Curve Models with Missing Data

How robust are Structural Equation Models to model miss-specification? A simulation study