Abstract:The ability to engage in goal-directed behavior despite exposure to stress is critical to resilience. Questions of how stress can impair or improve behavioral functioning are important in diverse settings, from athletic competitions to academic testing. Previous research suggests that controllability is a key factor in the impact of stress on behavior: learning how to control stressors buffers people from the negative effects of stress on subsequent cognitively demanding tasks. In addition, research suggests that the impact of stress on cognitive functioning depends on an individual's response to stressors: moderate responses to stress can lead to improved performance while extreme (high or low) responses can lead to impaired performance. The present studies tested the hypothesis that (1) learning to behaviorally control stressors leads to improved performance on a test of general executive functioning, the color-word Stroop, and that (2) this improvement emerges specifically for people who report moderate (subjective) responses to stress. Experiment 1: Stroop performance, measured before and after a stress manipulation, was compared across groups of undergraduate participants (n = 109). People who learned to control a noise stressor and received accurate performance feedback demonstrated reduced Stroop interference compared with people exposed to uncontrollable noise stress and feedback indicating an exaggerated rate of failure. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest reduction in Stroop interference. In contrast, in the group exposed to uncontrollable events, self-reported stress failed to predict performance. Experiment 2: In a second sample (n = 90), we specifically investigated the role of controllability by keeping the rate of failure feedback constant across groups. In the group who learned behavioral control, those who reported moderate levels of stress showed the greatest Stroop improvement. Once again, this pattern was not demonstrated in the group exposed to uncontrollable events. These results suggest that stress controllability and subjective response interact to affect high-level cognitive abilities. Specifically, exposure to moderate, controllable stress benefits performance, but exposure to uncontrollable stress or having a more extreme response to stress tends to harm performance. These findings may provide insights on how to leverage the beneficial effects of stress in a range of settings.

Why do interracial interactions impair executive function? A resource depletion account.

Male Internet addicts show impaired executive control ability: evidence from a color-word Stroop task.

Asymmetric Interaction Effects of Information with Varying Priorities in Visual Working Memory

Seeing race and seeming racist? Evaluating strategic colorblindness in social interaction.

The contribution of difficulty of an irrelevant task to task conflict

The Stroop effect at 80: The competition between stimulus control and cognitive control.

Deciding without Resources: Resource Depletion and Choice in Context

Interpersonal, Community, and Societal Stressors Mediate Black-White Memory Disparities

Temporal dynamics analysis reveals that concurrent working memory load eliminates the Stroop effect through disrupting stimulus-response mapping

When Does Stress Help or Harm? The Effects of Stress Controllability and Subjective Stress Response on Stroop Performance

Composite Measures of Brain Activation Predict Individual Differences in Behavioral Stroop Interference

Not All Stroop-Type Tasks Are Alike: Assessing the Impact of Stimulus Material, Task Design, and Cognitive Demand via Meta-analyses Across Neuroimaging Studies

The Impact of Illusory Fatigue on Executive Control

Effects of racial discrimination on stress, negative emotions, and alcohol craving: A registered report of a virtual reality experiment.

A drop in cognitive performance, whodunit? Subjective mental fatigue, brain deactivation or increased parasympathetic activity? It's complicated!

Impact of perceived interpersonal similarity on attention to the eyes of same-race and other-race faces

The influence of reward in the Simon task: Differences and similarities to the Stroop and Eriksen flanker tasks

Perceiving Racial/Ethnic Disadvantage and Its Consequences for Self-Esteem among Asian-Americans

Do Task Sets Compete in the Stroop Task and Other Selective Attention Paradigms?

Exploring the bilingual advantage: manipulations of similarity and second language immersion in a Stroop task

Age exacerbates the negative effect of depression on executive functioning in racial and ethnic minorities