Refractive and Visual Outcomes of a Monofocal Non-Constant Aberration Aspheric Intraocular Lens
Adrián Hernández-Martínez,Miguel A Díaz-del-Rio,María Ruiz-Santos,Ramón Ruiz-Mesa,Pedro Tañá-Rivero
DOI: https://doi.org/10.2147/OPTH.S373587
2022-08-11
Clinical Ophthalmology
Abstract:Adrián Hernández-Martínez, Miguel A Díaz-del-Rio, María Ruiz-Santos, Ramón Ruiz-Mesa, Pedro Tañá-Rivero Ophthalmology Department, Oftalvist Huelva, Huelva, Spain Correspondence: Adrián Hernández-Martínez, Oftalvist Huelva, Pl. Ivonne Cazenave, 1, Huelva, 21004, Spain, Email Purpose: To evaluate the refractive and visual outcomes following cataract surgery and implantation of a new monofocal non-constant aberration aspheric intraocular lens (IOL). Methods: Ninety eyes of 86 patients who underwent implantation the CT LUCIA 621P IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG) were retrospectively analyzed in this study. Main outcome measures were refractive error and monocular corrected distance visual acuity (CDVA) and monocular uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA) values. Patients were evaluated at 1-month post-surgery and intra- and post-operative complications were recorded. Results: Eighty percent of the eyes showed a CDVA of 20/25 or better before surgery. The postoperative mean values of monocular distance Snellen decimal UDVA and CDVA were 0.64± 0.22 and 0.89± 0.13, respectively. All eyes showed the same or better difference between UDVA and CDVA. In relation to the postoperative spherical equivalent, the highest percentage of eyes, 31.11%, was for the range between − 0.50 and − 0.14D followed by 22.22% for the ± 0.13D range. Ninety percent of the eyes were within ± 1.00 D and 73.33% of eyes within ± 0.50 D. The mean postoperative spherical equivalent was − 0.18± 0.55D. 37.78% and 76.67% of the eyes showed a value ≤ 0.50 D and ≤ 1.00D, respectively, being the mean postoperative refractive cylinder − 0.81± 0.50D. No adverse events were reported in whole sample intra and postoperatively. Conclusion: The present study shows that cataract surgery with an monofocal non-constant aberration aspheric IOL implantation resulted in good visual performance and refractive outcomes. This lens may be considered as a valid choice for patients in a standard-routine cataract surgery practice. Keywords: intraocular lens, phacoemulsification, cataract, aspheric design, aberrations Today, one of the main purposes of cataract surgery is not only to restore visual acuity in our patients but also to provide the best possible visual acuity. One advance was the introduction of aspheric intraocular lenses (IOLs) in the market to correct the spherical aberration of the cornea and hence increase contrast sensitivity improving visual quality. 1,2 Despite published studies showing discrepancies about whether these IOLs improve visual performance over that with spherical IOLs (mainly due to inter-eye corneal spherical aberration variability, centration, tilt and asphericity of the IOL), 3 recent systematic reviews with meta-analysis concluded that aspheric monofocal IOL implantation resulted in less ocular spherical aberration and fewer ocular higher-order aberration than spherical IOLs. This might explain the better contrast sensitivity in patients with aspheric IOLs, especially under dim light. 4,5 It has been published that higher order aberrations can be induced with significant decentration or tilt of IOL with a negative aspheric optic due to the large difference in optical power between the intermediate and peripheral regions of the lens. 6,7 IOL with aberration neutral design are less impacted by misalignment. 8,9 A new design, called non-constant aberration aspheric, was proposed where the optical power is higher in the center and varies towards the periphery. It shows negative spherical aberration in the central region of the lens being reduced to zero near the periphery. Two models of this design have been evaluated reporting different outcomes for patients and surgeon satisfaction, optical and surface properties, visual performance, stability and Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rates: the CT LUCIA 601P 10–15 and the 611P 16–21 IOLs (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany). The two main differences between these models are that the C-loop haptic design is angulated (5 degrees) for the 601P and step vaulted (no angulation) for the 611P model. Both show an aspheric Zeiss optic (ZO) design. The design of the 611P model, theoretically, offers more robustness to decentration and tilt, and taking into account that the profile of the optic-haptic junction is thicker and more expanded, there should be more stiffness to the IOL, which would result in better centering and alignment, improving refractive predictability and stability. 16 The new model, the CT LUCIA 621P IOL (Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Jena, Germany) shows the same C-loop haptic design than the 611P model but with an optimized ZO optical aspheric profile. To our knowledge, no study has analyzed the visual and refractive outcomes of -Abstract Truncated-