Abstract:Objective To evaluate visual quality and pseudoaccommodation in patients after the implantation of an apodized diffractive aspherical multifocal intraocular lens (MIOL). Methods This was a prospective case series study. Thirty-five patients (50 eyes)who had agreed to undergo phacoemulsification and accept IOL implants were selected for the study. Any other eye disease or systemic disease was criteria for exclusion. The eyes were divided into 2 groups according to the type of IOL implanted. One group was implanted with apodized diffractive aspherical MIOL (AcrySof ReSTOR SN6AD3) and the other group was implanted with apodized diffractive MIOL (AcrySof ReSTOR SN60D3). Twenty-five eyes of 17 patients were implanted with SN6AD3 and 25 eyes of 18 patients were implanted with SN60D3. All patients were assessed 3 months postoperatively for aberrations of the crystalline lens, the modulation transfer function, uncorrected distance visual acuity (UCDVA), uncorrected near visual acuity (UCNVA), best corrected distance visual acuity (BCDVA), distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA), pseudoaccommodation,contrast sensitivity and the rate of eyeglass removal for near. Data were compared using an independent samples t test and x2 test. Results UCDVA, BCDVA, UCNVA and DCNVA in the SN6AD3 group were not statistically different from the SN60D3 group (P＞0.05). There were statistical differences between the two groups when spherical, 4th-order higher aberrations and total higher-order aberrations were compared. The SN6AD3 group had lower aberrations than the SN60D3group under 3 and 5 mm pupils. There were statistical differences in the MTF for spatial frequencies of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 c/d. For these spatial frequencies, the SN6AD3 group had higher scores than the SN60D3 group. Accommodative range was (0.925±0.549)D in the SN6AD3 group and (0.964 ±0.582)D in the SN60D3 group. There were no statistically significant difference in accommodative range between the SN6AD3 and SN60D3 groups (t=0.217, P＞0.05). There were statistical differences in contrast sensitivity for spatial frequencies of 3, 6, 12 and 18 c/d. At these spatial frequencies, the SN6AD3 group had better contrast sensitivity than the SN60D3 group. The rate of eyeglass removal for near for the two MIOL groups was 80% and 72% (x2=0.439, P=0.508).Conclusion The AcrySof ReSTOR apodized diffractive aspherical MIOL provides excellent distance and near visual acuity, pseudoaccommodation and higher contrast sensitivity.

Visual function and subjective quality of life in Chinese cataract patients after implantation with aspheric intraocular lenses.

The Comparison of Visual Quality Following Cataract Surgery with Aspheric and Spherical Intraocular Lens Implantation

Effect of Aspheric (Z9001) and Standard (911a and AR40e)intraocular Lenses on Visual Function and Quality of Life

Clinical study inpatient-reported outcomes after binocular implantation of aspheric intraocular lens of different negative spherical aberrations

Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Sensitivity after Implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural Aspherical Intraocular Lens

Evaluation of Visual Quality of Spherical and Aspherical Intraocular Lenses by Optical Quality Analysis System

Visual quality analysis using the Chinese Catquest-9SF scale following different spherical aberration IOL implantation

A Clinical Study of Visual Function after Acri Smart 36A-5 Intraocular Lens Implantation

Postoperative visual quality comparative study of spherical and aspheric astigmatism type of intraocular lens implantation

Visual Quality Analysis after Implantation of Aspheric Intraocular Lens

[Comparison of Contrast Sensitivity and Wavefront Analysis after Implantation of AcrySof IQ Aspherical Intraocular Lens].

Short-term Evaluation of Visual Quality, Amplitude of Accommodation, and Stereoacuity Between Patients with Moderate-to-High Myopia Who Underwent ICLV4c Implantation and SMILE.

Clinical study of Acrysof IQ aspheric intraocular lenses: Clinical study of aspheric intraocular lenses

Aspheric Intraocular Lenses Implantation for Cataract Patients with Extreme Myopia.

Comparative analysis of visual quality after implantation of multifocal toric and monofocal toric intraocular lenses

Clinical performance of aspheric Acri.Smart 36A intraocular lenses

Visual outcomes and optical quality after implantation of a diffractive multifocal toric intraocular lens

Aberration And Contrast Sensitivity Comparison Of Aspherical And Monofocal And Multifocal Intraocular Lens Eyes

Visual function after aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses implantation

[Clinical comparison study of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses].

Visual quality evaluation of short-term in pseudophakic eye with 1CU accommodating intraocular lenses