Abstract:PURPOSE:To compare visual function in pseudophakic patients with bilateral implantation of Tecnis multifocal aspheric and conventional monofocal spherical intraocular lenses (IOL).METHODS:A prospective study of 100 consecutive cases (200 eyes) was conducted. All cataract patients underwent phacoemulsification were randomized to receive multifocal aspheric IOL (Tecnis ZM900, AMO, multifocal aspheric group) or conventional spherical IOL (Akreos Adapt, Bausch & Lomb, monofocal spherical group). The following investigations were performed to assess the uncorrected and distance-corrected visual acuity of distance, intermediate and near distances, accommodative amplitude, spherical aberrations of total eye, contrast sensitivity, glare sensitivity and near stereoacuity. Patients were surveyed for visual disturbances and lifestyle visual quality. The independent-samples t test was used to compare the measure data which met normal distribution and the Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare the measure data which didn't meet. The chi-square test was applied to compare categorical variables.RESULTS:The uncorrected and distance-corrected bilateral visual acuity of multifocal aspheric group at 30 cm and 40 cm were 0.24 ± 0.12 and 0.22 ± 0.11 (logMAR), better than monofocal spherical group (Z = -8.261, P = 0.000; Z = -5.508, P = 0.000), but the visual acuity at other distances had no statistical difference between two groups. Patients with multifocal aspheric IOL had significantly higher accommodative amplitude than those with monofocal spherical IOL, improved about 2.3 ∼ 2.8 D (Z = -10.655, P = 0.000; Z = -2.709, P = 0.007). Mean spherical aberration of multifocal aspheric group was (0.027 ± 0.160) µm and (0.006 ± 0.083) µm, significantly lower than that of monofocal spherical group (0.269 ± 0.161) µm, (0.037 ± 0.205) µm at 5 mm and 3 mm pupil diameter (Z = -8.815, P = 0.000; Z = -2.791, P = 0.005). The difference of contrast sensitivity was not significant, but glare sensitivity was higher for monofocal spherical group than for multifocal aspheric group. Multifocal aspheric group showed statistically better uncorrected stereoacuity (72.4 ± 29.9)″ than monofocal spherical group (92.8 ± 35.7)″ (Z = -3.089, P = 0.002).CONCLUSIONS:The present clinical results demonstrated that Tecnis multifocal aspheric group had better near visual acuity, accommodative amplitude and near stereoacuity as compared to conventional monofocal spherical group. The aspheric design reduced spherical aberration of total eye and improved contrast sensitivity in some way.

Spherical Aberration, Visual Performance and Pseudoaccommodation of Eyes Implanted with Different Aspheric Intraocular Lens

[Clinical comparison study of aspheric and spherical intraocular lenses].

Study of clinical application of aberration-free aspheric intraocular lens

A Study of the Amplitude of Pseudoaccommodation in Eyes after Multifocal Intraocular Lens Implantation

The Comparison of Visual Quality Following Cataract Surgery with Aspheric and Spherical Intraocular Lens Implantation

[Binocular Clinical Comparison Study of Tecnis Multifocal Aspheric and Monofocal Spherical Intraocular Lenses].

Visual Outcome and Optical Quality after Bilateral Implantation of Aspheric Diffractive Multifocal, Aspheric Monofocal and Spherical Monofocal Intraocular Lenses: A Prospective Comparison

[Spherical Aberration, Contrast Sensitivity and Color Discrimination after Cataract Surgery with the Aspherical Intraocular Lens].

Aberration And Contrast Sensitivity Comparison Of Aspherical And Monofocal And Multifocal Intraocular Lens Eyes

Clinical study inpatient-reported outcomes after binocular implantation of aspheric intraocular lens of different negative spherical aberrations

Changes of pseudophakic accommodation of aspheric intraocular lens designs in phacoemulsification

The Efficiency of Aspheric Intraocular Lens According to Biometric Measurements

Effect of Aspheric (Z9001) and Standard (911a and AR40e)intraocular Lenses on Visual Function and Quality of Life

[Comparison of Wavefront Aberrations in Pseudophakia with Three Types of Intraocular Lenses Implantation].

Contrast Sensitivity and Glare Sensitivity after Implantation of AcrySof IQ Natural Aspherical Intraocular Lens

Visual quality evaluation of short-term in pseudophakic eye with 1CU accommodating intraocular lenses

Clinical performance of aspheric Acri.Smart 36A intraocular lenses

Analysis of contrast sensitivity and pseudoaccommodation in aspherical multifocal intraocular lens implantation

Comparative study on functional vision in patients with aspheric and spheric intraocular lens implantation

Visual function after aspheric multifocal intraocular lenses implantation

Visual Performance with Accommodating and Multifocal Intraocular Lenses.