[Observation of visual quality after implantation of a rotational asymmetric refractive intraocular lens with a low addition region using the micromonovision design]
Y W Li,Y Liu,X Li,S N Wang,G Y Zheng
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn112142-20230220-00060
2023-12-11
Abstract:Objective: To investigate the effects of the application of a low addition refractive multifocal intraocular lens (IOL) using the micromonovision design in the non-dominant eye with different degrees of preset myopia on the visual acuity, visual function and visual quality after bilateral cataract surgery. Methods: In this randomized controlled trial, patients who were proposed to undergo bilateral phacoemulsification combined with rotational asymmetric refractive IOL (MF15 IOL) implantation at the First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University between September 2020 and August 2022 were included. All patients were divided into three groups using the random number method. The target refraction of the IOL in the dominant eye was 0.00 D. Non-dominant eyes were given different preoperative IOL reserve refractions, with the reserved near additional degree>0.20 D and≤0.40 D as the low addition,>0.40 D and≤0.60 D as the medium addition, and>0.60 D and≤0.80 D as the high addition. We compared uncorrected distance visual acuity (UDVA), uncorrected intermediate visual acuity (UIVA) and uncorrected near visual acuity (UNVA) of monocular and binocular eyes at 1 day, 1 month and 3 months postoperatively in the 3 groups of patients. Furthermore, the contrast sensitivity, stereopsis, defocus curves and visual quality questionnaire results of binocular eyes were compared at 3 months postoperatively. The statistical methods mainly used were chi-square test, two-factor repeated measures ANOVA, one-way ANOVA, LSD test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and paired t-test. Results: A total of 110 patients (220 eyes) were enrolled in the study, including 48 males and 62 females, with an average age of (59.74±9.38) years. There were 40 patients (80 eyes) in the low additional degree group, 37 patients (74 eyes) in the medium additional degree group, and 33 patients (66 eyes) in the high additional degree group. The differences in distance, intermediate and near visual acuity of the dominant eyes among the three groups were not statistically significant at different measurement timepoints postoperatively (P>0.05). The differences in intermediate and near visual acuity of the non-dominant eyes were also not statistically significant (P>0.05) among the three groups. In contrast, at 3 months, the UDVA of the non-dominant eyes in the low additional degree group (0.04±0.06) and medium additional degree group (0.04±0.07) was significantly higher than that in the high additional degree group (0.08±0.09) (F=4.776, P=0.011, bias η2=0.086). There was no statistically significant difference in binocular uncorrected distance, intermediate and near visual acuity among the three groups at different postoperative timepoints (P>0.05). The binocular UDVA, UIVA and UNVA (logMAR visual acuity) at 3 months postoperatively were -0.04±0.04, 0.03±0.08, 0.10±0.13 in the low addition group, -0.01±0.05, -0.02±0.06, 0.09±0.10 in the medium addition group, and 0.02±0.07, 0.01±0.09, 0.16±0.11 in the high addition group. At 3 months postoperatively, the binocular contrast sensitivity of the low additional degree group was significantly higher than that of the high additional degree group (P<0.05), except that there was no significant difference at the spatial frequency of 6 cycles per degree in the absence of glare (P>0.05). The binocular contrast sensitivity of the medium additional degree group was significantly higher than that of the high additional degree group at the spatial frequencies of 6 and 18 cycles per degree in the glare condition (P<0.05). The difference in the binocular contrast sensitivity between the low and medium additional degree groups did not reach statistical significance (P>0.05). The peak of the binocular defocus curve in the three groups was significantly wider than that in the monocular eyes, and the decline trend was more gentle, with no trough in the middle, and the visual acuity could be maintained above 0.2 (logMAR visual acuity) in the 0.00 D to -3.00 D defocus range. There was no significant difference in the postoperative near stereopsis results among the three groups (P>0.05), with the percentage of near stereopsis sharpness≤60″ reaching 90.00% (36/40), 89.19% (33/37) and 78.79% (26/33), respectively. The proportions of VF-14 scores≥90 in the postoperative questionnaire were 90% (36/40), 91.89% (34/37) and 81.82% (27/33) for the low, medium and high additional degree groups, respectively. The differences in the probability of photic phenomena and spectacles-independent rate were not statistically significant (P>0.05). Conclusion: The use of micromonovision design for bilateral implantation of a rotational asymmetric refractive MF15 IOL, with the non-dominant eye reserved for different near additional degrees, can enable cataract patients to have significantly improved binocular full-range vision, visual function and visual quality. When the degree of reserved near additions in the non-dominant eye preoperatively is>0.20 D and≤0.60 D, it can ensure sufficient binocular UDVA, UIVA and UNVA after surgery, and meanwhile help to obtain superior contrast sensitivity and stereopsis, as well as a satisfactory spectacles-independent rate and low incidence of photic phenomena.