Microstructure characteristics and mechanical properties of cold metal transfer welding Mg/Al dissimilar metals
Jing Shang,Kehong Wang,Qi Zhou,Deku Zhang,Jun Huang,Guangle Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2011.05.008
IF: 9.417
2012-01-01
Materials & Design
Abstract:AZ31B Mg alloy and 6061 Al alloy were joined by using cold metal transfer (CMT) welding with pure copper (HS201) as the filler metal. The microstructure of Mg/Al CMT weld joint was studied by means of Optical Microscopy, Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM), Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX), X-ray Diffraction (XRD). Results showed that dissimilar metals of Mg/Al could be successfully joined by CMT under proper processing parameters. The bonding strength of the joint was 34.7 MPa. A variety of Al–Cu intermetallic compounds, i.e. AlCu, CuAl 2 , Cu 9 Al 4 , presented in the fusion zone of Al side, and Cu based solid solution was generated in weld zone, while Cu 2 Mg and Al–Cu–Mg ternary eutectic structure was formed in the fusion zone of Mg side. The micro-hardness in the both sides of fusion zones increased sharply, which were 362 HV in Mg side and 260 HV in Al side. The joint was brittle fractured in the intermetallic compound layer of the fusion zone of Mg side, where plenty of Cu 2 Mg intermetallic compounds were distributed continuously. Keywords A. Non-ferros metals and alloys D. Welding F. Microstructure 1 Introduction Mg alloys are the best and lightest metal materials which are used in high technology fields such as automotive, electron and aerospace industries. However, the welding technology between Mg alloys and other metals has been an important research field at present. For example, the fusion welding problem of Mg alloys and steel or Al alloys exists in automotive manufacture. Welding of Mg and Al to form a compound structure can reduce the weight of the structure and the cost of the component [1,2] . The intersection of modern industrial materials makes the welding technology of Al and Mg alloys urgently. This technology has become a research focus in the weld field [3,4] . At present, friction stir welding [5,6] and diffusion bonding [7,8] are used to obtain higher strength Al/Mg joints. But the flexibility of friction stir welding is poor, while diffusion bonding is less efficient and needs to be put in a vacuum chamber. So these solid-phase connections are somewhat limited in application. Meanwhile tungsten inert gas welding [9] , metal inert gas welding [10] , laser welding [11,12] and other conventional fusion welding inevitably make fusion zone generate a thick intermetallic compounds layer, which leads to the cracks seriously affecting the joint strength [13] . The generation of intermetallic compounds was reduced by cold metal transfer (CMT) welding with the characteristics of low heat input [10] and Al/Steel dissimilar metals joint with good performance has been obtained by CMT process [14,15] . In this paper, CMT welding was used to weld Mg alloy and Al alloy with HS201 filler metal, the microstructures and mechanical properties of the joints were studied. The study provides a theoretical reference and practical experience for Mg/Al dissimilar metals connection. 2 Experimental procedure Samples (100 × 50 × 3 mm) of extruded AZ31B Mg alloy and 6061 Al alloy were welded in this experiment. The chemical compositions of these two metals were shown in Table 1 . The pure copper (HS201) filler metal (φ1.2 mm) was chosen and its chemical composition was shown in Table 2 . Before welding, the oxide films on substrates surface were removed by stainless steel wire brush, and acetone were wiped to remove the oil. The dimension of the welding plate and the shape of the weld bead were shown in Fig. 1 . The welding equipment was CMT welding machine of Fronius-5000 type. The main welding parameters such as, welding current, welding voltage, wire feed speed and welding speed were shown in Table 3 . A series of specimens were cut along the longitudinal direction of the CMT welded joint by a lining cutting machine and mounted in bakelite for microstructure examination. Mg alloy side of the joint was etched in a solution of 1 ml oxalic acid and 1 ml nitric acid and 1 ml acetic acid and 150 ml distilled water. Al alloy side of the joint was etched in a solution of 2 ml hydrofluoric acid and 5 ml nitric acid and 95 ml distilled water. Microstructure, fracture morphology and phase composition of joints were observed and analyzed respectively by OLYMPUS (GX71) Optical Microscope, FEI Quanta 200 Scanning Electron Microscope and D8 ADVANCE X-ray Diffraction. The micro-hardness distribution was measured by the HVS-1000 Digital Display Micro-hardness Tester with a load of 0.2 kgf for 10 s. SANS CMT5105 universal testing machine was used for tensile test. The geometry of tensile test samples was shown in Fig. 2 . 3 Results and discussion 3.1 Microstructures of joints 3.1.1 Welded joints in different welding parameters Fig. 3 shows macrophotographs of the weld in different welding parameters listed in Table 3 . Welding current of the sample 1 shown in Fig. 3 a was minimal. It is obvious that filler metal were not enough, incomplete fusion and lack of penetration could be observed on the back of the weld due to the low feeding speed. Coupled with the solidification shrinkage, the crack parallel to the weld centre appeared immediately after welding. Weld reinforcement and width of samples 2 and 3 as shown in Fig. 3 b and c increased gradually due to the increase of the welding current. Sample 3 with good formation was welded at the current of 129 A, voltage of 12.0 V, wire feed speed of 5.7 mm/s and welding speed of 0.65 m/min. Welding current of sample 4 as shown in Fig. 3 d was maximal. The color of the weld surface was black, which indicated that weld had been oxidized and burned severely. The heat input of the sample 4 was so large that the weld formation was bad and the weld was cracked immediately after solidification. The phase composition of the weld sample 4 analyzed by X-ray Diffraction (XRD) was shown in Fig. 4 . The result showed the existence of a variety of Al–Cu–Mg ternary intermetallic compounds such as Al 2 CuMg, AlCuMg, Al 5 Cu 6 Mg 2 and Al 7 Cu 3 Mg 6 in the weld, which led to the cracks after welding. Samples 2, 5, 6 as shown in Fig. 3 b, e, f were in the same welding current and different welding speed. With the decrease of welding speed, weld formation showed the same trend as the samples from 1 to 4. 3.1.2 Microstructures in Al side Fig. 5 shows optical micrograph in fusion zone of Al side of sample 3 welded at the current of 129 A, voltage of 12.0 V, wire feed speed of 5.7 mm/s and welding speed of 0.65 m/min. A mutual soluble zone between the Al substrate and the weld metal Cu was formed in the processing of weld metal solidification. Columnar crystals, which grew into the weld metal, were distributed in the fusion zone near Al substrate side where heat conducted quickly. The transition from columnar crystals to cellular crystals was existed in fusion zone, where the flaky kainotype compounds was formed due to the changes of solidifying conditions. Fig. 6a–c shows Scanning Electron Microscope (SEM) micrographs in the Regions 1–3 marked in Fig. 5 respectively, and Energy Dispersive X-ray (EDX) analysis results obtained from different locations ( Fig. 6a–c ) were illustrated in Fig. 7 . SEM micrograph in fusion zone near Al side was shown in Fig. 6 a. White phase (point B) was distributed disorderly in black phase (point A). Fig. 7 a shows the EDX result from location point A consisted of 94.89 at.% Al and 5.11 at.% Cu, so there was Al-based solid solution. Fig. 7 b shows the EDX result from location point B, where Cu element increased to 22.98 at.%, while Al decreased to 75.72 at.%, which indicated that this location was composed of Al-based solid solution and CuAl 2 eutectic structure. SEM micrograph in the fusion zone centre was shown in Fig. 6 b. With the fusion between Al substrate and weld metal Cu, white phase (point E) increased, while black phase (point C) decreased, and light grey regeneration phase (point D) was generated. Fig. 7 c shows the EDX result from location point C. The phase composition at point C was still Al-based solid solution, whose amount was reduced significantly with the further fusion and diffusion of Cu element. The above analysis conformed to the solidification theory: the solute accumulation layer in different degrees tended to form in front of solid–liquid interface in the welding pool [16] . Fig. 7 d shows the EDX result from location point D consisted of 59.14 at.% Al, 26.91 at.% Cu and 13.95 at.% Mg, which suggested that this location mainly consisted of CuAl 2 and Cu–Mg–Al ternary eutectic structure. The increase of Mg element was due to solute segregation [17] . Fig. 7 e shows the EDX result from location point E consisted of 55.21 at.% Al, 41.46 at.% Cu and 3.32 at.% Mg, which indicated that this location should be composed of AlCu and CuAl 2 . Some studies also indicated that during the Al/Cu reaction Al-rich phase CuAl 2 was the first intermetallics formed adjacent to Al side [18–20] . In Fig. 6 c, black phase almost disappeared, the interface between fusion zone and weld metal was clear. Fig. 7 f shows the EDX result from rectangular region F consisted of 48.00 at.% Al, 51.20 at.% Cu and 0.80 at.% Mg, which suggested that this region should be comprised of AlCu and Cu 9 Al 4 . Some studies also indicated that during the Al/Cu reaction Cu-rich phase Cu 9 Al 4 was the first intermetallics formed adjacent to Cu side [18–20] . Fig. 7 g shows the EDX result from rectangular region G consisted of 95.22 at.% Cu, where the phase was Cu based solid solution. 3.1.3 Microstructures in Mg side Optical micrograph in fusion zone of Mg side of sample 3 by the welding current of 129 A, voltage of 12.0 V, wire feed speed of 5.7 mm/s and welding speed of 0.65 m/min was shown in Fig. 8 . The fusion line was clear. The black line that existed along the interface between Mg substrate and fusion zone was Mg oxidation generated in the welding process. The grain boundaries of Mg substrate were melted slightly and partly due to its low melting point. The structure close to the weld metal was columnar crystals, which grew into the weld metal. The microstructure near the fusion zone was obviously different from the weld metal and Mg substrate. The columnar crystals close to the weld metal were shown regularly. EDX analysis results from the fusion zone of Mg side were shown in Fig. 9 . Fig. 9 a shows the SEM micrograph in the fusion zone of Mg side. Grey phase (point B) distributed near Mg substrate side, plenty of flaky regeneration phase (point C) existed in the fusion zone. Fig. 9 b shows the EDX result from point A ( Fig. 9 a), which contained 91.20 at.% Mg, 4.32 at.% Al and 4.48 at.% O. Small amounts of O element was existed because of the oxidation in the welding process. There is no Cu element but small amount of Al element derived from Mg substrate. It could be determined that the phase was the Mg-based solid solution. Fig. 9 c shows the EDX result from point B ( Fig. 9 a) consisted of 68.68 at.% Mg, 20.33 at.% Al, 5.86 at.% O and 5.13 at.% Cu, which indicated that some Cu element diffused to the Mg substrate. The content of Al increased slightly due to solute segregation. This location should be composed of Mg-based solid solution, Mg 17 Al 12 and Cu–Mg–Al ternary eutectic structure. Fig. 8 d shows the EDX result from point C ( Fig. 9 a) consisted of 30.06 at.% Mg, 4.32 at.% Al and 65.61 at.% Cu, which indicated that the main composition of flaky regeneration phase was Cu 2 Mg. 3.2 Mechanical properties of the joints 3.2.1 Micro-hardness analysis The micro-hardness test points were taken every 0.25 mm on the weld and every 0.4 mm on both sides of the substrates. The distribution of micro-hardness of sample 3 was shown in Fig. 10 . Two dotted lines represented the fusion lines of Al side and Mg side respectively. The micro-hardness in the both sides of fusion zones increased sharply and the maximal values were 362 HV in Mg side and 260 HV in Al side, which were higher than that of the Mg substrate (50–55 HV) and Al substrate (35–40 HV). The micro-hardness in the weld metal was uniform and the value was about 115–140 HV. The micro-hardness of the material was dependent on its microstructure. A variety of intermetallic compounds of Mg, Cu and Al or two of them formed near the fusion zone endowed its high hardness [21,22] . The intermetallic compounds inevitably led to embrittlement of the joint and caused stress concentration, which reduced joint strength [13] . 3.2.2 Tensile strength and fracture analysis Tensile strength tests were carried out by SANS CMT5105 universal testing machine with the loading rate of 1 mm/min. The bonding strength of the joint of sample 3 was 34.7 MPa. Fracture occurred in brittle intermetallic compound layer of the fusion zone adjacent to Mg substrate. The fracture morphology was characterised by SEM, as shown in Fig. 11 . The ice-sugar pattern morphology confirmed that the fracture in Fig. 11 was in brittle fracture mode. EDX analysis results from the fracture were shown in Fig. 12 . It could be seen clearly from Fig. 12 a that a large amount of particle phase with edges and corners were embedded in the fracture surface, and some cavities with edges and corners appeared on the fracture surface, where intermetallic particles were pulled out. EDX analysis results from point 1 and point 2 ( Fig. 12 a) were shown in Fig. 12 b and c. Particle phase contained 29.19 at.% Mg, 4.79 at.% Al, 66.02 at.% Cu at point 1 and 37.84 at.% Mg, 5.09 at.% Al, 57.07 at.% Cu at point 2. It could be inferred that the particle phase was mainly composed of Cu 2 Mg. These intermetallic compounds with brittle properties, which distributed continuously in the fusion zone, led to the fracture. 4 Conclusions (1) Mg/Al dissimilar metals were successfully connected by CMT welding with pure copper as filler metal. The proper processing parameters were welding current of 129 A, welding voltage of 12.0 V, wire feed speed of 5.7 mm/s, welding speed of 0.65 m/min. (2) A variety of Al–Cu intermetallic compounds, i.e. AlCu, CuAl 2 , Cu 9 Al 4 , presented in the fusion zone of Al side, and Cu based solid solution was generated in weld zone, while Cu 2 Mg and Al–Cu–Mg ternary eutectic structure was formed in the fusion zone of Mg side. (3) The bonding strength of the joint was 34.7 MPa. Fracture occurred in the fusion zone of Mg side where the value of micro-hardness was highest. The fracture was in brittle fracture mode. A large amount of Cu 2 Mg intermetallic compounds distributed continuously in the fusion zone resulted in the fracture. Acknowledgement This research work was financially supported by a Grant from NUST Research Founding of Nanjing University of Science and Technology (No. 2010XQTR01). References [1] J.C. Feng Y.R. Wang Z.D. Zhang Status and expectation of research on welding of magnesium alloy TNMSC 15 2 2005 165 178 [2] R.C. Zeng W. Ke Y.B. Xu Recent development and application of magnesium alloys Acta Metall Sinica 37 7 2001 673 685 [3] J.K. Larsson Overview of joining technologies in the automotive industry Weld Res Abroad 49 6 2003 29 45 [4] X. Cao A review of laser welding techniques for magnesium alloys J Mater Process Technol 171 2 2006 188 204 [5] Y.J. Kwon I. Shigematsu N. Saito Dissimilar friction stir welding between magnesium and aluminium alloys Mater Lett 62 2008 3827 3829 [6] J.C. Yan Z.W. Xu Z.Y. Li L. Li S.Q. Yang Microstructure characteristics and performance of dissimilar welds between magnesium alloy and aluminium formed by friction stirring Scripta Mater 53 2005 585 589 [7] L.M. Zhao Z.D. Zhang Effect of Zn alloy interlayer on interface microstructure and strength of diffusion-bonded Mg–Al joints Scripta Mater 58 2008 283 286 [8] G. Mahendran V. Balasubramanian T. Senthilvelan Developing diffusion bonding windows for joining AZ31B magnesium–AA2024 aluminium alloys Mater Des 30 2009 1240 1244 [9] P. Liu Y.J. Li H.R. Geng J. Wang Microstructure characteristics in TIG welded joint of Mg/Al dissimilar materials Mater Lett 61 2007 1288 1291 [10] J. Wang J.C. Feng Y.X. Wang Microstructure of Al–Mg dissimilar weld made by cold metal transfer MIG welding Mater Sci Technol 24 7 2008 827 831 [11] R. Borrisutthekul Y. Miyashita Y. Mutoh Dissimilar material laser welding between magnesium alloy AZ31B and aluminium alloy A5052-O Sci Technol Adv Mater 6 2005 199 204 [12] L.M. Liu H.Y. Wang Z.D. Zhang The analysis of laser weld bonding of Al alloy to Mg alloy Scripta Mater 56 2007 473 478 [13] H. Li M. Qian D. Li The effect of intermetallic compounds on laser weldability of dissimilar metal joint between magnesium alloy AZ31B and aluminium alloy 6061 Laser J 28 5 2007 61 63 [14] H.T. Zhang J.C. Feng P. He B.B. Zhang J.M. Chen L. Wang The arc characteristics and metal transfer behaviour of cold metal transfer and its use in joining aluminium to zinc-coated steel Mater Sci Eng A 499 2009 111 113 [15] H.T. Zhang J.C. Feng P. He H. Hackl Interfacial microstructure and mechanical properties of aluminium–zinc-coated steel joints made by a modified metal inert gas welding–brazing process Mater Charact 58 2007 588 592 [16] H.Q. Hu Metal solidification 1985 Metallurgical Industry Press Beijing [17] P. Liu Y.J. Li H.R. Geng J. Wang Microstructure characteristics in TIG welded joint of Mg/Al dissimilar materials Mater Lett 59 2005 2001 2005 [18] X.K. Peng R. Wuhrer G. Heness W.Y. Yeung On the interface development and fracture behaviour of roll bonded copper/aluminium metal laminates J Mater Sci 34 1999 2029 2038 [19] C.Y. Chen H.L. Chen W.S. Hwang Influence of interfacial structure development on the fracture mechanism and bond strength of aluminium/copper bimetal plate Mater Trans 47 2006 1232 1239 [20] P. Xue B.L. Xiao D.R. Ni Z.Y. Ma Enhanced mechanical properties of friction stir welded dissimilar Al–Cu joint by intermetallic compounds Mater Sci Eng A 527 2010 5723 5727 [21] L.M. Liu X.J. Liu S.H. Liu Microstructure of laser-TIG hybrid welds of dissimilar Mg alloy and Al alloy with Ce as interlayer Scripta Mater 55 2006 383 386 [22] M.L. Zhu F.Z. Xuan Correlation between microstructure, hardness and strength in HAZ of dissimilar welds of rotor steels Mater Sci Eng A 527 2010 4035 4042