Abstract:Artificial currencies have grown in popularity in many real-world resource allocation settings, gaining traction in government benefits programs like food assistance and transit benefits programs. However, such programs are susceptible to misreporting fraud, wherein users can misreport their private attributes to gain access to more artificial currency (credits) than they are entitled to. To address the problem of misreporting fraud in artificial currency based benefits programs, we introduce an audit mechanism that induces a two-stage game between an administrator and users. In our proposed mechanism, the administrator running the benefits program can audit users at some cost and levy fines against them for misreporting their information. For this audit game, we study the natural solution concept of a signaling game equilibrium and investigate conditions on the administrator budget to establish the existence of equilibria. The computation of equilibria can be done via linear programming in our problem setting through an appropriate design of the audit rules. Our analysis also provides upper bounds that hold in any signaling game equilibrium on the expected excess payments made by the administrator and the probability that users misreport their information. We further show that the decrease in misreporting fraud corresponding to our audit mechanism far outweighs the administrator spending to run it by establishing that its total costs are lower than that of the status quo with no audits. Finally, to highlight the practical viability of our audit mechanism in mitigating misreporting fraud, we present a case study based on the Washington D.C. federal transit benefits program. In this case study, the proposed audit mechanism achieves several orders of magnitude improvement in total cost compared to a no-audit strategy for some parameter ranges.

Fraud Allegations and Government Contracting

Whistleblowing Allegations, Audit Fees, and Internal Control Deficiencies*

Corporate Lobbying and Fraud Detection

Firm performance, imperfect competition, and corruption risks in procurement: evidence from Swedish municipalities

Subcontracting requirements and the cost of government procurement

Catch Me If You Can: Combatting Fraud in Artificial Currency Based Government Benefits Programs

Do Corporate Frauds Distort Suppliers’ Investment Decisions?

An Investigation of Seeming Favoritism in Public Procurement

The Association Between Fraud Hexagon and Government’s Fraudulent Financial Report

Impact of Government Outsourcing Contracts on High-Tech Vendors: an Empirical Study

Practices of public procurement and the risk of corrupt behavior before and after the government transition in México

False Advertising

Executives Implicated in Financial Reporting Fraud and Firms' Investment Decisions

Political sensitivity and government oversight in the US corporate bond market: evidence from federal contractors

The impact of industry consolidation on government procurement: Evidence from Department of Defense contracting

Controlling Corruption in Development Aid: New Evidence from Contract-Level Data

Does Government Punish Nonprofits for High Administrative Costs in Contracting Decisions?

Sweeping the dirt under the rug: measuring spillovers of an anti-corruption measure

Discretion and political favoritism: Evidence from two reforms in public procurement

Government Procurement Contract Design with Unobservable Productivity and Moral Hazard

Swayed by prior interactions? How government contracting acts as a substitute for lobbying activity