Abstract:Problem definition: Project outsourcing has been a pronounced trend in many industries but is also recognized as a major cause for project delays. We study how companies can coordinate outsourced projects with uncertain completion times through bilateral contract negotiations. Academic/practical relevance: Misaligned subcontractor incentives may result in substantial losses to both project clients and subcontractors. Coordinating subcontractors’ efforts through proper contracts is imperative to the success of project outsourcing. Most previous studies on project contracting have not addressed subcontractors’ bargaining powers or the dynamic bargaining process in negotiations. We fill in this gap by studying bilateral bargaining between the client and subcontractors, which better reflects real-world negotiations. Methodology: We model project contract negotiations as a multiunit bilateral bargaining game. We derive the conditions such that bilateral negotiations can achieve system coordination and characterize the equilibrium negotiation outcomes. We then compare the conditions and equilibria under various model settings to study their impact on project contracting. Results: Our study uncovers how the coordination of project outsourcing is impacted by the contract form, bargaining power structure, precedence network topology, payment timing, external opportunities, and negotiation protocols. For single-task projects, the widely used fixed-price (cost-plus) contract can achieve system coordination only when the subcontractor (client) possesses full bargaining power. Cost-sharing and time-based incentive contracts, which perform well for single-task projects, may not be effective for projects with parallel tasks when any subcontractor’s bargaining power is sufficiently high. Projects with serial tasks can be coordinated only under certain extreme bargaining power structures. Delaying payments always exacerbates the incentive misalignment. Managerial implications: Our analysis provides insights and guidelines to companies regarding how to select proper contract forms and payment timing schemes, based on the characteristics of the projects and subcontractors, to ensure the effectiveness of project outsourcing. Our results also highlight the importance of bargaining modeling in project contracting.

Subcontracting requirements and the cost of government procurement

Subcontracting Retreat: Early Estimates Using Administrative Data

Coordinating Investment, Production, and Subcontracting

Public Procurement And Project Management At Transitional Context : Analysis Of Single Source Contracting Practices

Bidding and renegotiation in procurement auctions

Dual Sourcing in Repeated Procurement Competitions

Discretion and public procurement outcomes in Europe*

Price Adjustment Policies in Procurement Contracting: An Analysis of Bidding Behavior

Auctioning Supply Contracts

RFQ, Sequencing, and the Most Favorable Bargaining Outcome

Fraud Allegations and Government Contracting

On the trade-off between supplier diversity and cost-effective procurement

Practitioner Perceptions of City-Subcontracted Community Organizing

A by-product of big government: the attenuating role of public procurement for the effectiveness of grants-based entrepreneurship policy

Discretion and political favoritism: Evidence from two reforms in public procurement

Coordinating Project Outsourcing Through Bilateral Contract Negotiations

The Organized Foundation of Administrative Subcontract

Procurement in welfare programs: Evidence and implications from WIC infant formula contracts

Organizational Boundary of Administrative Subcontracting:An Analysis of “the Separation of Officials and Local Staff”and Stratified Mobility

How to avoid source disruption of emergency supplies in emergency supply chains: A subsidy perspective

Discretion and Supplier Selection in Public Procurement