Abstract:There is an increasing call for a governmental organisations such as local health departments and federal health and human service agencies to partner with community based organisations (CBOs) for health promotion. There is a large body of literature suggesting that CBOs need capacity building or empowerment to do this work, but less literature about the necessary culture shift at governmental organisations who fund public health work. This study aimed to examine the knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs of CBO leadership who do not want to partner with state funders, and understand which structures and practices demonstrate power-sharing in a community-led approach. We conducted six interviews with community-based organisation leaders and conducted a thematic analysis and a secondary, inductive discourse analysis of the transcripts to analyse why organisations chose not to apply for a government funded initiative and how they talked about power-sharing for community-led public health. Themes about the decision for CBOs to apply to the public health funding initiative: how it related to the CBO's scope of work, meeting the needs of the community, having the technical capacity, and cross-cutting themes of putting the community first and having a long-term positive impact. Organisations rejected the opportunity for this funding due to poor fit, even if they could fulfil the scope of work. A community-led approach was described as one that includes the government giving up control, creating spaces for meaningful participation and power-sharing, and systems demonstrating trust in CBOs. These findings reiterate that in order for public health to be community-led, there needs to be system-wide transformation and intentional investment that supports an infrastructure for community-led public health. State funders can learn from practices in trust-based philanthropy, such as flexible funding and reporting requirements. The results of this study can support the wider participation of CBOs in collaboration with state actors, maximising the transformative potential of collaboration, ultimately transforming power structures and advancing health equity.

Practitioner Perceptions of City-Subcontracted Community Organizing

Actualising power sharing in community-led initiatives: Insights from community-based organisation leaders in Chicago, USA

Privatizing the Welfare State: Nonprofit Community-Based Organizations as Political Actors

Nonprofit-Public Partnerships for Local Development: Social Inputs in Policy Implementation

Community Partner Perceptions of Equitable Implementation Practices for a Promotores de Salud Intervention: A Qualitative Assessment

Leveraging a Community-Based Research Approach to Explore Research Perceptions among Suburban Poor and Underserved Populations

Organized abandonment under racial capitalism: Measuring accountable actors of structural racism for public health research and action

A stakeholder analysis of community-led collaboration to reduce health inequity in a deprived neighbourhood in South Korea

Cross-sector partnerships in the South City Choice Neighborhoods Initiative (CNI): An exploratory case study of collaboration network structure and process in Memphis, Tennessee

Youth activism in the urban community: learning critical civic praxis within community organizations

Disguising Social Change: The Role of Nonprofit Organizations as Protective Masks For Citizen Participation

Justice System Reform for Health Equity: A Mixed Methods Examination of Collaborating for Equity and Justice Principles in a Grassroots Organizing Coalition

More than meets the eye: Organizational capacity of nonprofits in the poor, rural South

How Theory and Research Inform Citizen Participation in Poor Communities: The Ecological Perspective and Theories on Self- and Collective Efficacy and Sense of Community

Community-Driven Youth Justice and the Organizational Consequences of Coercive Governance

Exploring the Role of Nonprofits in Public Service Provision: Moving from Co-production to Co-governance

From Infrastructural Repair to Reparative Planning

Neighborhood Effects on Integrative Organizational Practices in Five Global Cities

Community-Engaged Public Health Research to Inform Hospital Campus Planning in a Low Socioeconomic Status Urban Neighborhood

Amplifying Community-led Violence Prevention as a Counter to Structural Oppression

Community-Based Organizational Capacity Building as a Strategy to Reduce Racial Health Disparities