Abstract:Procurement and outsourcing are two important topics for many firms.An increased number of companies outsource some of their internal functions to the third party in order to focus on their core competencies and improve their competitive advantage in the market.The popularity of outsourcing is growing,as both successes and failures have been observed in practice.It remains unclear about how the outsourcing decision influences each party's behavior and strategic decisions under different procurement mechanisms. In this paper we model a supply chain system in which a manufacturer purchases multiple components.For each component,there are multiple suppliers capable of providing it.The manufacturer considers outsourcing the procurement of all components to one of his suppliers,rather than purchasing them by himself.Since the production costs are not publicly known,auctions are used to reward the contract.In the first stage,the manufacturer uses the first-price sealed-bid reverse auction to determine which supplier wins the outsourcing contract.Then,the winner of the first auction produces the component that the company is able to provide,and uses reverse auctions to procure the required components from the subset of the suppliers in the first auction. We analyze a supplier's bidding strategies in both stages.In the second period the supplier's bidding strategy is independent of the publicly announced winning price in the first stage.The boundary conditions and differential equations are used to help formulate the supplier's bidding strategies in the first period.The supplier's first-period bidding price for the whole package can be decomposed into expected costs associated with all components.We also compare a manufacturer's total procurement cost when a manufacturer purchases components by itself versus when integral procurement is auctioned.The result shows that the total expected procurement costs are identical under both mechanisms.Furthermore,an explicit solution of bidding strategies for all suppliers can be derived for a special case,where the supplier's cost distributions are uniform.We also provide a numerical example to illustrate the supplier's bidding behavior. These results provide managerial insights for the managers.We show that although outsourcing integral procurement increases the complexity of the bidding strategy for the suppliers,it does not increase the manufacturer's total expected procurement cost.However,the outsourcing strategy can help the manufacturer focus on its core competency.

Bidding and renegotiation in procurement auctions

A Contingency Model of Bidding Strategies in Online Auctions in China.

Renegotiations after procurement auctions: Coping with supply disruptions due to underestimating costs

Strategic behavior in dynamic auctions

Auctioning Supply Contracts

A Comparison of a Simple Procurement Auction and Generalized Nash Bargaining

Auctions Versus Posted-Price Selling

License Bidding – Sunk Costs that Matter

Dynamic Procurement Management by Reverse Auctions with Fixed Setup Costs and Sales Levers

Why is below average bid auction preferred in procurement?

Limited Liability and High Bids in English Auctions

Optimal procurement strategies by reverse auctions with stochastic demand

Auctions Versus Posted-Price Selling: the Case of Correlated Private Valuations

Goodwill Can Hurt: A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation of Return Policies in Auctions.

A Two-stage Equilibrium Bidding Strategy in Outsourcing Procurement of Multiple Components

Bargaining Versus Posted-Price Selling

The renegotiation friction of R&D outsourcing contracts

Auction Design for Value Maximizers with Budget and Return-on-spend Constraints

The price-bidding strategy for investors in a renewable auction: An option games–based study

Bilateral communication in procurement auctions

Information acquisition and/or bid preparation: A structural analysis of entry and bidding in timber sale auctions