Abstract:Research Summary: This study examines whether corporate social responsibility (CSR) improves firms’ competitiveness in the market for government procurement contracts. To obtain exogenous variation in firms’ social engagement, I exploit a quasi‐natural experiment provided by the enactment of state‐level constituency statutes, which allow directors to consider stakeholders’ interests when making business decisions. Using constituency statutes as instrumental variable (IV) for CSR, I find that companies with higher CSR receive more procurement contracts. The effect is stronger for more complex contracts and in the early years of the government‐company relationship, suggesting that CSR helps mitigate information asymmetries by signaling trustworthiness. Moreover, the effect is stronger in competitive industries, indicating that CSR can serve as a differentiation strategy to compete against other bidders. Managerial Summary: This study examines how companies can strategically improve their competitiveness in the market for government procurement contracts—a market of economic importance (15–20% of GDP). It shows that companies with higher social and environmental performance (CSR) receive more procurement contracts. This effect is stronger for more complex contracts, in the early years of the government–company relationship, and in more competitive industries. These findings indicate that firms’ CSR can serve as a signaling and differentiation strategy that influences the purchasing decision of government agencies. Accordingly, managers operating in the business‐to‐government (B2G) sector could benefit from integrating social and environmental considerations into their strategic decision making.

Effects of Bid Protests Against Government Agencies on Firm Performance: Role of Interorganisational Relationship

Government intervention and corporate M & A transactions : Evidence from China

The impact of public procurement on market competition: evidence from South Korea

Who Initiates Layoffs and Affects Firm Performance? Conflict of Interests between Active Foreign Institutional Investors and Outside Directors

Competing for government procurement contracts: The role of corporate social responsibility

The Effect of Supplier Development on Outsourcing Performance: the Mediating Roles of Opportunism and Flexibility

The Effect of Buyer Digital Capability Advantage on Supplier Unethical Behavior: A Moderated Mediation Model of Relationship Transparency and Relational Capital

Political Connections and Firm Performance: Evidence from Government Officials' Site Visits

The profits vs protests: Corporate value dynamics amidst activist uproar

Political Ties and Firm Performance: the Effects of Proself and Prosocial Engagement and Institutional Development

Firm performance, imperfect competition, and corruption risks in procurement: evidence from Swedish municipalities

Investigation of product quality and advertising: Government intervention in advertising

Effects of Idiosyncratic Deals, Psychological Contract, Job Satisfaction and Environmental Turbulence on Unethical Pro-Organizational Behavior

The Structure of Political Institutions and Effectiveness of Corporate Political Lobbying.

Red Tape Reform, Transaction Costs, and Corporate Social Performance: A Natural Quasi-Experiment in China

The effect of corporate political advocacy on brand perception: an event study analysis

Joint Contract–Function Effects on BIM-Enabled EPC Project Performance

On Mechanism of the Effects of Government Regulations on Market Structure and Performance

The effect of government-firm relationship on pollution reduction: The role of official performance appraisal

The Effectiveness of Contractual and Relational Governances in Construction Projects in China

The impact on the market for audit services of aggressive competition by auditors