Decoupling the Influence on Corporate Political Actions

Seong-jin Choi,Nan Jia,Jiangyong Lu
DOI: https://doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.17148abstract
2013-01-01
Abstract:This study borrows from the structural perspective in industrial organization and strategic management, and integrates the theory of new institutional economics and the theory of nonmarket capabilities to understand the contingency of firmsi¯ pursuit of political strategies. We examine how a firmi¯s relative nonmarket position – defined as how well the firm is positioned to manage political risks relative to peer firms in the same institutional environment – influences the firmi¯s use of political strategies. Moreover, we analyze how this relationship is contingent on different institutional contexts. Using survey data from a sample of over 16,000 firms in 37 countries, we demonstrate that firms that are in a less advantageous nonmarket position to shield themselves from the hazards of state predation and private expropriation than their peers are more likely to engage in lobbying and bribery activities, especially in an institutional environment with lower quality market-supporting institutions.
What problem does this paper attempt to address?