Abstract:China’s economic reform over the past two decades has decentralized various decision rights from the central government to local governments, including the control rights of enterprises. We develop two opposing hypotheses on how governments influence the allocation of human capital in listed companies in the process of decentralization. A positive view suggests that local governments, with enhanced profit incentives and competitive pressure among jurisdictions, promote efficiency in firms and markets, resulting in more professionally managed companies. An alternative view conjectures that local governments, subject to conflicts of interest with the central government, regulate firms and markets for their private interests, resulting in a lack of professionalism and fragmented markets. We present new data on the boards of directors of 621 companies that went public during 1993 through 2000 in China. We report that over 30 percent of the directors are affiliated with various layers of governmental agencies. The presence of politicians, especially those affiliated with local governments, is associated with fewer directors possessing business experience or expertise in law, accounting, or finance, fewer academician directors, and fewer directors from non-local administrative regions. Low education levels, few woman directors, and high director seniority also characterize boards populated with local politicians. The overall evidence is inconsistent with the positive view, but supports the agency view of government decentralization.

Political Influence and Corporate Governance: Evidence from Party-Building Reform in China

Political Connections and Firm’S Dividend Policy: Evidence from Chinese Privately Owned Firms

How Do Political Connections Cause SOEs and Non‐soes to Make Different M&A Decisions/performance? Evidence from China

Government intervention and corporate M & A transactions : Evidence from China

Political Connections, Founding Family Ownership and Leverage Decision of Privately Owned Firms

The Stock Market Implication of Political Connections: Evidence from Firms' Dividend Policy

Political Capital Vs. Constraint: Evidence from CEO Turnovers in Chinese Private Firms

Party control and corporate labour investment: evidence from China

The role of political party in curtailing opportunistic insider sales: Evidence from China

Political governance and corporate investment efficiency in China

Party leadership, corporate governance and stock price crash risk: Evidence from China

The role of political party in firm environmental governance: evidence from China

Corporate Governance Reform and State Ownership: Evidence from China

Political Capital and CEO Entrenchment: Evidence from CEO Turnover in Chinese Non-Soes

Do State-Owned Enterprises Have Worse Corporate Governance? An Empirical Study of Corporate Practices in China

Anti-corruption, Political Connections and Corporate Responses: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies

The Effect of Regulating Political Connections: Evidence from China's Board of Directors Ban

Political Connections, Financing and Firm Performance: Evidence from Chinese Private Firms

Corporate Governance of Controlling Shareholders and Labor Employment Decisions: Evidence from a Parent Board Reform in China

Do private firms invest more in environmental protection under political control? Evidence from China

Do Politicians Jeopardize Professionalism? Decentralization and the Structure of Chinese Corporate Boards