Abstract:With globalization, the cases of Chinese enterprises’ cross-border mergers and acquisitions (M&A) are increasing rapidly. The institutional environment of the host country has become an important factor influencing M&A performance, which has a profound impact on the success or failure of cross-border M&A. Based on this, for our study, we selected cases of cross-border M&A of listed companies in China from 2007 to 2018 as research samples to empirically test the impact of the host country’s governance capacity on the cross-border M&A performance of acquirers. It was found that the host country’s governance capacity has a negative effect on the M&A performance in the short term, but in the long term, it can effectively improve the cross-border M&A performance of acquirers. At the same time, specific to the relationship between the governmental governance capacity of six different dimensions and long-term M&A performance, the government effectiveness, regulation quality, and rule of law have the most significant promotional effect on long-term M&A performance. This implies that acquirers should focus on the long-term impact of governmental governance capacity on M&A, and consciously lean toward countries with strong governance capacity in order to obtain long-term value growth when arranging overseas M&A activities. The conclusion of this paper provides a reliable basis on which for companies to achieve sustainable growth in complex economic activities.

Government intervention and corporate M & A transactions : Evidence from China

How Do Political Connections Cause SOEs and Non‐soes to Make Different M&A Decisions/performance? Evidence from China

Political Connections with Corrupt Government Bureaucrats and Corporate M&A Decisions: A Natural Experiment from the Anti-Corruption Cases in China

The Effect of Ownership Structure on Leverage Decision: New Evidence from Chinese Listed Firms

Marketization Level, Government Intervention and Firm M&As: Evidence from the Local SOEs in China

Government Intervention,Governance Environment and the Efficiency of Market for Corporate Control:Evidence from the M&As of Local Government-controlled Listed Companies

Government Intervention,Corporate Life Cycle and Performance of M&A:the Evidence from Chinese Local State- owned Listed Companies

Corporate Ownership, Political Connections And M&A: Empirical Evidence From China

Goyernment Control and Enterprises' Mergers & Acquisitions——Evidence from the Chinese Securities Market

The Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions of Local State-Owned Enterprises: The Role of Home Country Government Involvement

The Government Intervention, the Nature of Ownership and Enterprises'Mergers & Acquisitions

State Ownership and Cross-border M&As: Evidence from Chinese MNCs

Political Connections and M&A Decisions: A Natural Experiment from the Anti-Corruption Cases in China

Government Intervention,Political Connections and the Mergers of Local Government-Controlled Enterprises

Government Control, Levels of Government and the Performance of Mergers and Acquisitions of Enterprises

Government Intervention and Characteristics and Performance of Diversified M & A-Empirical Evidence from Central and Local State-owned Listed Companies

Governmental governance of host countries and cross-border merger and acquisition performance: Evidence from listed enterprises in China

Government Intervention and Investment Efficiency: Evidence from China

Private Benefits of Managerial Control, Government Ownership, and Acquirer Returns: Evidence from the Chinese State‐Controlled Listed Companies

Government Intervention,GDP Growth and Local SOE Overinvestment

Government Interventions,Private Benefits of Control and State-owned Enterprises Merger and Acquisition