Political Connections and Government Subsidies of Companies in Financial Distress: Empirical Evidence from Chinese ST Listed Companies
Yue Pan,Yiyi Dai,Caixi Li
DOI: https://doi.org/10.3969/j.issn.1008-3448.2009.05.003
2009-01-01
Abstract:Using the samples of ST companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen Stock Exchanges between 2002 and 2007, we empirically study the influence of the political connections of companies in financial distress on their ability to obtain government subsidies. We have found that: Firstly, when private firms fall into financial distress, their political connections have significant effects on their attainment of government subsidies; but the effects are insignificant for state-owned enterprises. This can be explained by the fact that compared with state-owned enterprises, private firms are at a disadvantage in obtaining government subsidies through normal channels; in this case, private firms will be motivated to take advantage of their executives' political connections to obtain government subsidies, and the stronger the executives' political influence, the greater government subsidies will be obtained. Secondly, we also examined the influence of the differences in the regional environment in which private firms operate, finding that the advantages of private firms' political connections are significantly influenced by the level of fiscal surplus of their respective regions. In provinces with higher levels of regional fiscal surplus, only when local governments have adequate financial resources to support firms in financial distress can these firms take advantage of their executives' political connections to obtain greater financial subsidies. The local governments' ability to intervene is subjected to their regional fiscal situation. Only when there are sufficient local fiscal surplus can private firms take advantage of their political connections to attain greater financial subsidies. Thirdly, judging from the results of government subsidies, we have found that although government subsidies can significantly boost firms' performance in the current year, their effects in enhancing the firms' performance in the long run vary with the firms' political connections and the nature of their business: private firms with weak political connections see strong effects of government subsidies on their long-term performance when they are in financial distress; yet, the long-term effects of government subsidies are much weaker for state-owned enterprises and for private firms with strong political connections. This, to a certain degree, indicates that political connections may lead to low operating efficiency of funds from government subsides.