Abstract:Many state-owned enterprises have mergers and acquisitions (M&A) with private enterprises, which has caused private enterprises to worry about their living space being squeezed. Based on 572 data records about equity transfers of Chinese listed companies extracted from CSMAR4.0 from 2013 to 2020, this paper categorized ownership structures into three categories: privatization of state-owned enterprises (Category 1), state-owned enterprises merging private enterprises (Category 2), and state-owned enterprises merging state-owned enterprises (Category 3). The categorical regression of ex-ante equity transfer motivation revealed that the motives for Category 1 conformed to the phenomenon of the "pretty girl gets married first" and "embezzlement view." Category In contrast, the motives for Category 2 conformed to the "fiscal revenue view." The categorical regression of ex-post equity transfer motivation showed that all three types significantly improved various efficiencies and represented an optimal allocation of resources. Moreover, it was revealed that the transfer of equity to state-owned enterprises by inefficient private firms in Category 2 also significantly improved enterprise efficiency. Thus, it can be considered as a rational behavior of market selection and never squeezed the space crowding. Further analysis showed that the efficiency improvement is due to the symbiotic development relationship rather than the antagonistic relationship between heterogeneous shareholders. Therefore, it is suggested to initiate market-oriented reform by actively developing ownership mixed-ownership economy and adhering to the "two unwavering" basic economic system.

The Government Intervention, the Nature of Ownership and Enterprises'Mergers & Acquisitions

Government intervention and corporate M & A transactions : Evidence from China

The Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions of Local State-Owned Enterprises: The Role of Home Country Government Involvement

How Do Political Connections Cause SOEs and Non‐soes to Make Different M&A Decisions/performance? Evidence from China

Political Connections with Corrupt Government Bureaucrats and Corporate M&A Decisions: A Natural Experiment from the Anti-Corruption Cases in China

Marketization Level, Government Intervention and Firm M&As: Evidence from the Local SOEs in China

Do Chinese firms benefit from government ownership following cross-border acquisitions?

Political Connections, Government Intervention and Acquirer Performance in Cross‐border Mergers and Acquisitions: an Empirical Analysis Based on Chinese Acquirers

Governmental governance of host countries and cross-border merger and acquisition performance: Evidence from listed enterprises in China

State Ownership and Cross-border M&As: Evidence from Chinese MNCs

Local Government Intervention, Firm–government Connection, and Industrial Land Expansion in China

Is state-owned enterprise merging private enterprise "market choice" or "space crowding" ? -Based on the motives of equity transfer of mixed-ownership enterprises

Government Intervention, Nature of Ownership and Enterprise Investment Efficiency——An Empirical Research Based on Panel Data Analysis

Local Government's "black Box" in Private Enterprises' Trans-ownership M & A Failure

Do Debts Act As Tools For Local State-Owned Companies To Resist Local Government Intervention In China?

How Does Government Ownership Affect Firm Performance? Evidence from China’s Privatization Experience

Firms’ FDI Ownership: the Influence of Government Ownership and Legislative Connections

Why Do Half of the Cross-Border M&As Conducted by Chinese MNCs Fail? Government Affiliation and Cross-Border M&A Completion

Local fiscal pressure and shadow banking activities of nonfinancial enterprises–A story of government intervention

Managerial Entrenchment, Ownership Structure and Diversifying Acquisition: Evidence from China

Government ownership and the capital structure of firms: Analysis of an institutional context from China